Messages

361

Off Topic / Boston Bomber Dzhokar Tsarnaev Sentenced to Death

« on: May 15, 2015, 03:32:32 PM »

YES!!! YES!!!!! YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BRAVO!!!!!!!!!

I'm surprised that it took so long, this madman should of been tortured and THEN given the death sentence.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2015/05/15/life-death-verdict-for-boston-marathon-bomber-dzhokhar-tsarnaev/3XNhQUypERIxLSe27T5HgM/story.html

362

Off Topic / Re: Casselberry Police Officer punished for sending Anime Meme with N-Word In It

« on: May 14, 2015, 07:50:47 PM »

did you even open the link to the article

"an officer is accused of sending a text with a racial slur to his supervisor."

I didn't see that part, forget about what I said then. To say that to your own supervisor is just stupid.

363

Off Topic / Re: Casselberry Police Officer punished for sending Anime Meme with N-Word In It

« on: May 14, 2015, 06:35:10 PM »

it was a group chat between at least three peopleit being a "private conversation" doesn't mean you can say whatever you want either
as soon as your boss is there, it's work-related. the way you act in "private" reflects on you even more than the way you act in front of your boss under normal circumstances

Was the boss in this "private" conversation?

364

Off Topic / Re: Casselberry Police Officer punished for sending Anime Meme with N-Word In It

« on: May 14, 2015, 06:24:18 PM »

it has nothing to do with being offended, it's unprofessional whether you're tribal or not

Bullcrap, this was sent between two officers via text message. NBA players do the filthiest things along with NFL men, either they say horrible things or beat their girlfriends. You'd think that this officer was doing that. He was having a private conversation.

365

Off Topic / Post the funniest TV moments!

« on: May 14, 2015, 06:14:44 PM »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmF8iIeOVEo

366

Off Topic / Re: The Government Having Surveillance on Everyone

« on: May 13, 2015, 11:45:47 PM »

your logic is loving awful and you should be ashamed of it.

by your same logic, the counter intelligence practices may not have found anything. no further justification of qualification. if you're arguing with no evidence, you are a I D I O T.
you"re not even trying. stop fearmongering.

At least I know that "you are a idiot" is not proper English, it should be "you are an idiot". Also I could give you lists of dozens of attempted attacks (mainly in NYC) which were prevented because of these programs that monitor tons of sites, mostly social media.

367

Off Topic / Re: My name is Ike and I'm ready for an AMA thread

« on: May 13, 2015, 10:19:49 PM »

Are you cookie monster in disguise? 

368

Off Topic / Re: Letter from Ex-Waffen SS member to Spielberg referencing Saving Private Ryan.

« on: May 13, 2015, 07:55:15 PM »

Most German soldiers weren't national socialists, and were just patriots fighting for their country.

History is written by the winners, so of course they'll emphasize all atrocities committed by the Axis, and try to pretend any atrocities committed by the Allies were for the "greater good"

I know right, just because they wore SS uniforms with swastikas did not mean they were national socialist's!

369

Off Topic / Re: The Government Having Surveillance on Everyone

« on: May 13, 2015, 07:53:55 PM »

considering the NSA has never found anything, i think we'll get by

How do you know that? If it weren't for counter intelligence practices, many attacks wouldn't of been prevented.

370

Off Topic / Re: The Government Having Surveillance on Everyone

« on: May 13, 2015, 07:24:57 PM »

privacy is more important

So you wouldn't be concerned if some radical were to blow up an American landmark?

371

Off Topic / Re: The Government Having Surveillance on Everyone

« on: May 13, 2015, 06:34:29 PM »

To a certain extent, it is unconstitutional, however for finding radical terrorists it does serve a purpose.

372

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 13, 2015, 05:31:01 PM »

yeah well anecdotal evidence is worthless

To you it is, visit your local welfare office if you live in a large metro city and you will get the picture.

373

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 13, 2015, 05:27:31 PM »

There are a lot of carriers offering free low end or even decent smart phones for free with a contract. I used to ride public transit and I saw a lot of people with low end phones.
Do you have any thing to cite that poor people are buying high end stuff?
I'm sure it's out there but I really don't think it's anywhere near the extent people like to claim

I see it with my own eyes. I've passed by welfare offices before, and all I see are fatasses with four kids with their iPhones and Air Jordan's. If they are so poor, where do they get the money for these items? I don't know the percentage of these welfare moochers, but there are certainly more than you think. Visit a welfare office in an inner-city, and you'll get the picture of the fraud going on in this nation.

374

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 13, 2015, 05:09:22 PM »

shoes and phones are needed lol. Not having shoes or phones put you at a massive disadvantage.

Think about it, a phone is literally access to all of the information in the world. Imagine that for a second.

We need phones.

You don't need an iPhone, sure a cell phone should be owned by everyone, however if you cant afford to get the most basic essentials (food, clothing) then get a flip phone. Shoes are needed as well, but spending hundreds on Nike's is abusing the system at best. There is no excuse for that, and when these suckers have more kids to get more money from the state is what sickens me.

375

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 13, 2015, 04:21:56 PM »

you know youd think with the hundreds of billions of dollars we spend on welfare that they would be able to get a passport

When the majority of the impoverished spend their money on sneakers and new phones, that's when you draw the line and realize the extent of welfare abuse nationwide.

Giving money to these uneducated people will not help them, forcefully sending them to educational institutions will help them. Otherwise, the money will keep going down exponentially. That's not to say that some people desperately need welfare though.