Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Na, I've been playing WoW (Ironic, really.)You posted like, 10 seconds after Bosch did.
:)
So you're telling me you've been sitting here, refreshing only to reply to my posts?
Talk about a no-lifer.
But remember, you were 'talking' to me. And I never knew about the notify on reply feature, so thanks.So, you're telling me you've been sitting here staring at the topic and refreshing the page every two seconds?
I was lying by the way, I won't be touching RTB while i'm gone. And you probably live somewhere irrelevant, I'm going to sydney as usual.Do you mind if I ask why you are flying out?
Haha, hypocrite.Yet another defensive answer. :3
Pages of relevant arguements against the 'mod'. No problem.Olol so I herd u liek defensive answers
I'd stop assuming that we assume in the first place. I never said you didn't speak, or work. I asked bosch a question about his model. Until you can construct something without the overuse of colliding primitives, just let bosch answer :)He will answer, but in the meantime, I am talking to you.
For 1, you obviously do care; You're getting all defensive. 2, I never forgot that, but bosch made the model in question - you just stuck some stuff together with boxes. So, my question stands.I love your little lists, they're cute and insignificant like you.
For bosch.
So essentially you're saying that the public are fail bandwagoners? I don't think that's the way to win their hearts.You seem to forget we are BOTH making this. I'm sick of you stupid friends trying to look cool. Anybody can answer anything, you have no control over anyone.
And that question was directed at him, you obviously have no idea what you're doing when you model anyway.
I said it was half decent, that's a positive. Now answer this, why work backwards in making a detailed model only to reduce it?When I hear the word "failure," it reminds me of bandwagoners like you.
Failure :)
So you did the dirty-work?I could've sworn I already said I didn't steal it.
Now that's skill!
When did I ever say nobody would use it? Obviously the person he stole it from uses it.Bosch didn't steal it, friend.
Lol hes owning you guys he doesnt care what you say XD.QFT
You're right, I don't have modeling skill. I'm a scripter. But I'll model a better player then you anyday ;)@ Packer, I never said it was my skill.
Edit: My reasoning for the model looking stolen is that no-one that is a respectable modeler in any form puts that much detail when they know this game has priority set on Low poly models, something you don't know about. I've constructed a few models, and you go through the model in stages. You don't make it extremely high detail, only to reduce it later. That's just impractical.
Yeh, I'm with packer, that model is stolen. There is no way in hell you can have a player model that looks like that, and a vehicle which looks the way the speeder does. It just doesn't match. Plus, the player model would be even easier to model then the speeder.Haha, that model is "stolen?" It's called skill. Something you don't have.
And JD, the blockland minifig may be alot more simple then the droid, but it's a WELL MADE model and probably uses half the polys the droid does, because it's mostly comprised of one shape, not a forgetload of primitives. Your droid however, looks like you put it together with your eyes closed. Overlaping stuff all over the place, and attempts to add detail which just look like mis-placed boxes.
