Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I'm well aware people used to burn down black churchs lmaoYes but assuming its a clinton supporter by default with all this contextual evidence is a little more farfetched than assuming it's a Annoying Orange supporter. I'm not saying that it's definite who did it but it's reasonable to assume that it was somebody who supported Annoying Orange.
You however didn't provide any evidence of it actually be burned down by Annoying Orange voters besides some graffiti that for all you know I went in and painted on there.
It just is so much more logical to assume it's an attempt at undermining
real criminals no matter how dumb, rarely ever have just intentionally left their clear motives/evidence behind to show off.my favorite fantasy is pizzagate
thats just fantasy lol
problem is that its not a system thats easy to generalize. what would the system include? what would it allow modders to do?A state system with some organization would be pretty easy to pull off. It requires a lot of arrays to dedicate stop and go conditions like a regular save state does, but it actually has more possibilities than the regular states have.
i know that swollow has done a lot regarding this but a lot of it is very specific purposes. for example, she used it to make a revolver she made eject shells in the right position and the right orientation, and also used it (without reusing any of that old code/bot) to animate a canteen going to your face to drink. its hard to generalize vastly different uses like this into one general system.
first ones were proven to faked by liberals trying to make news.since none of the culprits have been found for either this or the church, there's no solid evidence for who perpetrated it. so far it seems that conservatives burned the church down and liberals burned this house down. nothing was ever proven true or false, and has yet to be proven.
this one is possible to be faked by a guy for insurance lol. but we dont know yet.
The first one didn't happen that way tho. Besides be proven wrong no one would burn down a church then paint the person they wanted to win on the evidence like what???It did happen that way though. People used to burn and attack black people all throughout 1900s to 1970s to prevent black people from voting and to strike fear into communities. The chances of someone saying "vote Annoying Orange" on a burned church is likely set to say "vote him or this will hapen" by 99% rather than the 1% chance of it being some reverse psychology scheme to put dirt on Annoying Orange, someone who had no involvement in the incident whatsoever.
This one also seems super fake tho
only a select few think it's funny when it's just literal trashso you
I said 20 seconds, not minutes.same thing smh
20 seconds out of my day to tell you, who spends hours on this forum posting absolute puerile stuff constantly, that nobody likes it.What can i say- its what i do best. Next time use those 20 minutes to do something productive, like beat up a kangaroo
Nope. I'm not the coder, but I assume it wouldn't be easy to make separate scripts for bots because the way bots move and fire guns would make them really inaccurate. Ingame, moving and firing fully auto hipfire is literal cancer spray lol.You can specify a variable that will cause bots to have a certain spray level of your choosing. Look at raycast weapons and you can find RaycastAccuracy or something which pertains to bots only.
We currently don't plan to make the guns optimized for bots, but a quick fix would be changing the mag size for the guns to 9999.
Clinton sort of confirmed Wikileaks during one of the debates when the moderator read off part of one email and she explained the context.Wikileaks isn't one person finding and leaking information; its a collective of moderated sources that come from different leaks and such. The credibility behind each leak is questionable but worth seeking information on. Also worth noting that people who leak information are very biased and will usually search for information that pertains to a person that they are biased against the most. If wikileaks were on Clinton's side we'd probably have a slew of Annoying Orange dirt and almost no Clinton dirt being dug up. It just happens that the people that are leaking this information are against Clinton.
I don't think you can just believe authority on account of authority. I'd wait and see what evidence if any they can produce about Russia being involved. As of right now, it's just finger pointing.I'm a little hesitant to agree with this statement because it seems like the stock hypocrisy i see a lot of.
