946
Off Topic / Re: Something about war that bothers me.
« on: February 13, 2014, 02:22:20 PM »What if Riddler was just a fat guy who rolled over 6 million jews?see NOW you're talking about Riddler not cool man not cool
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
948
Off Topic / Re: Something about war that bothers me.
« on: February 13, 2014, 01:14:27 PM »I am not loving talking about Riddler you asswipe.who said i was talking to you~
I am talking about the average German soldier.
also anyone who thinks I'm serious about genocide needs to take a step back and reconsider
949
Off Topic / Re: Something about war that bothers me.
« on: February 13, 2014, 11:53:12 AM »what about the christians d00dgas the kikes race war now
950
Off Topic / Re: Something about war that bothers me.
« on: February 13, 2014, 02:04:06 AM »Counter challenge: Tell me why exterminating the jews was a good thing without looking like a bigot or sociopaththeir influence on the modern western culture has been nothing but negative
there are rampant accusations of child enthusiasm against well-renowned jewish individuals (google hollywood child enthusiasm)
It's been proven that circumcision (a primarily jewish practice) reduces potential pleasure received during love
jews did 9/11
gas the kikes race war now
951
Off Topic / Re: Something about war that bothers me.
« on: February 13, 2014, 01:45:20 AM »
Riddler did nothing wrong
tell me why exterminating the jews is a bad thing
hardmode: you can't mention the loss of human life or their culture
tell me why exterminating the jews is a bad thing
hardmode: you can't mention the loss of human life or their culture
952
Off Topic / Re: Something about war that bothers me.
« on: February 12, 2014, 11:37:10 PM »
w-whats this steinberg? t-these goyim know that the national socialists w-weren't evil dog-eating babykillers?
SHUT IT DOWN
SHUT IT DOWN
953
Off Topic / Re: BOEING 757 FAN THREAD OF CASUAL WORLD CLEANSING (also page stretch cus Mr. Man)
« on: February 12, 2014, 11:30:59 PM »I've already addressed the first point, but I'll do it one more time just so we're clear:That's a link, by the way. Clicking it will get you the full size, just so you can read the part where it says "C-130" and then read the word "bomb"http://puu.sh/6U7wn.png
part 2:
I'm not blind, you're assuming it's bolted. The size is significantly smaller, and that rig appears attached to the tank. In my eyes, it appears to be a system where the tank is stopped, an arm folds down, locks into place, and then secures to the ground. Unless you have documentation on that specific blueprint that says it is bolted to the ground, no.
Also, in terms of the set-up time... Set it up before enemies get there? It's for howitzers, they're not SUPPOSED to be that close to the enemy. Get it ready, fire away, when they find you, take it apart and ship out. Not a hard concept. It's the same as any other howitzer setup.
right there
show me where it is attached to the tank
show me how it folds down
you are blind
954
Off Topic / Re: BOEING 757 FAN THREAD OF CASUAL WORLD CLEANSING (also page stretch cus Mr. Man)
« on: February 12, 2014, 07:51:17 PM »reference for the sake of an brown townogy, apples and oranges is what I wanted: loud vs quiet bombersThe AC130 is not, has not, and will never be a bomber. Again, you are comparing aircraft designed for two distinctly different roles.
That last image is a newer concept by german military for a tank cannon suppressor.
That last image has it loving bolted to the ground. are you blind? In the time it takes to get that thing set up, the enemy will have laughed themselves to death.
955
Off Topic / Re: BOEING 757 FAN THREAD OF CASUAL WORLD CLEANSING (also page stretch cus Mr. Man)
« on: February 12, 2014, 07:24:24 PM »
done
956
Off Topic / Re: BOEING 757 FAN THREAD OF CASUAL WORLD CLEANSING (also page stretch cus Mr. Man)
« on: February 12, 2014, 07:15:46 PM »I don't understand how there are still "Russia is best" bandwagoners, it really is a bad country"stop liking what i don't like!"
Guy's he's rightthe AC130 and B2 bomber are designed for two completely missions. AC130 is for direct, close-in air support. The B2 is a strategic nuclear bomber. stop comparing apples and oranges.
that's why we don't use silencers, there aren't tanks with built in sound suppressors, ghillie suits are outdated and marines don't use them anymore, and now when we send troops somewhere, we give them a friendly phone call first saying "lol, see you in 20"
In case you were wondering, that's sarcasm and you should feel bad, stealth is completely vital nowadays. You send in an AC-130 to drop a bomb, and all it takes is 1 good hit from a SAM to down it. B2 Spirit? They won't know what forgetin' hit em. The AC-130 typically has a crew of 6+, a B2 has a crew of 2. The AC-130 can go 300 mph, the B2 can do mach 1 (roughly 760mph). The AC-130 is loud as stuff AND it's easily detected. The B2 Stealth bomber is difficult to detect AND it's quiet.
So tell me again how stealth isn't necessary.
I want one.
PS if a B2 was flying at the same height as an AC130 would in combat conditions it'd get shot down by AAA fire anyways.
PPS tanks don't use suppressors? the explosive force released when the shell is fired is too powerful. the germans use this for artillery training grounds but that's literally the smallest they could build it.
957
Drama / Re: Just bought Blockland, but wtf
« on: February 09, 2014, 06:11:07 PM »-snip-Wow, okay.
I get that you're the only one working on this game and negative responses like this can seriously get to your head, but this sort of response is not acceptable.
I'm not going to compare you to anyone else because you've made it clear that BL is not quite the same as every other game out there, but you should still realize that this sort of response doesn't endear you to the rest of the world. The rest of the forum will kiss your ass and talk about how "epic" or "cool" that "Smackdown" was but really it was just embarrassing. I'm guilty of this behavior in the past but this is the sort of hostile behavior that can alienate potential new users. The simple response could've just been to lock or delete the thread but this happened.
Just wow.
958
Games / Re: Wargame Megathread - RED DRAGON TEASER OUT
« on: February 09, 2014, 03:41:53 PM »
god damn forget you
959
Games / Re: Wargame Megathread - RED DRAGON TEASER OUT
« on: February 09, 2014, 12:20:56 AM »
NATO's big strength is airpower and helicopters. Except for england, PACT will almost always have superior tanks.
960
Games / Re: Wargame Megathread - RED DRAGON TEASER OUT
« on: February 08, 2014, 05:20:14 AM »
more
