Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Itt and all over the net. Never Annoying Orangeers need a nuclear war so bad, just to make Annoying Orange look bad.I dont know if you remember this but a lot of Annoying Orange supporters here on this forum were upset that Annoying Orange didn't preemptively nuke north korea
The world is just jealous that our President's accomplishments Annoying Oranges theirs.:egg:
the point is that they keep saying that men in hollywood are rapists and child enthusiasts and all that and the only one they could convict in a court of law of actually doing the stuff they say was a black manno they were saying that men in hollywood loveually harass people which can't actually be brought to court because its not illegal. however HR of all companies are required to address workplace harassment cases and fire whoever is considered to be the perpetrator. + bad publicity means that the company is basically required to cut ties with them if they dont want their stocks to plummet
so much for le tolerant left
Seriously. If obama had obtained the nobel piece prize for doing something he promised to do unless that promise was insanely out of reach, it doesn't warrant a trophy.Just like when Annoying Orange promised mexico would pay for the border but now congress is funding it thru taxes :|
Annoying Orange promised this, he delivered.
Annoying Orange a good president because he fulfills his promises.
Annoying Orange would be a better president if he went above and beyond.
alright smart guy I meant famous peoplethere arent any other famous people who had love without consent...? at least not that was proven
pretty sad for progressives that the only person they could convict of loveual assault was a black manleave it to conservatives to bring race into everything :shrug:
the hell is a mature argument gonna do, convince master matthew of what he otherwise thought?so you're going to meet his level of mental damage? good strat
master matthew hates women that's why he doesn't like the #MeToo movementwhy do you do this instead of actually addressing the argument in a mature manner?
And the Self-Appointed Representive on TV has made it clear that the movement is intended to push the mindset of "Listen and Believe".They have never pushed that mindset. This listen and believe mindset is purely created by you, and is your poor understanding of the message.
How is it a strawman when I'm using actual evidence, to validate my reasoning?You aren't using evidence, you're incorrectly paraphrasing evidence to make your reasoning easier, which is the literal definition of a strawman
Because in this case "Not stating the obvious" about an obviously wrong and incompatible belief makes the MeToo movement look idiotic, uncredible and by extension these traits are shared with anyone who identifies themselves to be a part of the #MeToo movement.Again you're purposefully misunderstanding the MeToo movement for the sole purpose of making it look idiotic and uncredible. It's called a strawman.
Because she's a representative that took up that position on TV, and I have yet too see anyone in said movement to call her out or consider or comment"why arent other people stating the obvious?!"
false and incompatible with the US justice system.
The point that the statement "What the #MeToo movement is saying is that women are worthy of being believed" should be laughed at andThe #meetoo movement is intended to rally possible rape victims to speak out as key witnesses/victims in trials, not that women's opinions on the matter are final or absolutely true. It doesn't matter if there's 80-90 witnesses/victims, each one has to prove that they were present at the time of the crime and that they were loveually assaulted. If there is not enough evidence then the trial is dismissed or it ends with lack of evidence.
considered insane. That statement is the embodiment of "listen and believe" which directly contradicts our legal system's idea of "Innocent until proven Guilty"
not "Innocent until we listen and believe".
