Messages

3631

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 23, 2014, 12:11:19 AM »

Holy stuff this is a level of edgy.
Found it on /pol/, apparently they loving loved it

That's beautiful.

3632

Off Topic / Re: Just built my PC

« on: October 23, 2014, 12:09:44 AM »

ventilation is p good actually. the only complaint is that its a pretty big case, and bad cable management

Seriously, make sure to do cable management. Makes things so much loving easier.

3633

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 23, 2014, 12:07:14 AM »

im loving crying lmao

Ah you caught my ninja. :/ DAMN YOU JTIZZLE!!!

...

Doesn't mean I didn't agree with it on some of my posts... Don't get too mad.

3634

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 23, 2014, 12:05:37 AM »

I've never seen anyone support feminism and then diss panloveuals

When did I dis them? I'm a flaming panpizzaloveual now and there's no kitchen utensils that can stop me.

Also I like to debate stuff, I don't necessary have to agree with my position. :)

3635

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 23, 2014, 12:02:36 AM »

Those smooth grey curves... a slightly roughened surface... the firm wood cast handle... What's not to love?

I see the appeal. I think I'll convert.

Though I might want to dabble in spatulaloveuality. Seems a bit rough for my tastes but I guess you only live once.

its your call brother we get to select our characters because we were the first to establish battle

forget yeah, I'm the red pants guy.

3636

Off Topic / Re: Philosophical Thread

« on: October 23, 2014, 12:00:27 AM »

a true hero of our time

I don't even think he said that...

3637

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:49:34 PM »

Homoloveual, gay, lesbian, biloveual, panloveual, aloveual, and anything similar are just labels. You cannot define someone's loveuality. You can only define your own. Now shut the forget up and stop trying to tell people what they are.

How do you define your own without a label? Also what is a panloveual and why do they want to forget pans?

3638

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:46:54 PM »

oasis it looks like we just got ourselves into a righteous tagteam match
i got you bro, lets do this!

I want to be the guy with the fabulous red sweatpants. You can be the bald guy.

Or wait, are we the asians in the matching blue pants?

3639

Off Topic / Re: Philosophical Thread

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:42:21 PM »

You never get a proper look at yourself, and it's been said that you wouldn't recognize a clone of yourself like you would a friend

in fact some scientists from a source i do not know have determined that if you saw a clone of yourself you would have a hard time associating that with what you think you look like

What the forget are you two talking about, lol.

3640

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:38:03 PM »

i mean it's simple to accept. like why you have to investigate that as if you're gonna invalidate it? but anyways, you can have love with someone without being loveually attracted to them. you know, feelsgoodman.jpg.

Jesus christ, can no one ask questions on the internet anymore? I want to understand, and since apparently you and Foxnight are experts I figured this was as good of a time as any to ask.

So, are you saying aloveuals don't feel attraction but they have love because it feels good? But then they don't desire what feels good?

"science cant explain this so i cant accept it"

lol didn't say that.

3641

Off Topic / Re: Philosophical Thread

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:35:59 PM »

Right, but I'm talking about how other people physicaly see you
You never get a proper look at yourself, and it's been said that you wouldn't recognize a clone of yourself like you would a friend

Believe me, I'd recognize a clone of myself.

3642

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:32:39 PM »

I was angry as this was outright the completely wrong way to handle the issue, it was more like insulting being a male.I have been in a school where all people do is fight ever since the second grade, someone throws a book, and then someone throws a desk back, I have learned to control anger, wasn't really that mad, it was just an expression.

How does it insult being a male, just a question, don't throw a desk at me. That was condescending and I apologize.

3643

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:31:41 PM »

look i mean

it's so simple to just accept that some people dont experience loveual attraction that i don't see why it's a problem

it's really a simple concept

Ever? They don't experience loveual attraction ever? Or sometimes they do? Also its not a problem, I'm trying to understand.

And it is not a simple concept. Aloveuality has no evolutionary purpose. Even gay love has more evolutionary purpose than having no love.

3644

Off Topic / Re: Philosophical Thread

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:30:05 PM »

To be fair your face is not perfectly symmetrical so you do look a little different than what you see in the mirror.

So your face is lopsided the other way, it's still the same loving face. lol

3645

Off Topic / Re: FCKH8 has hit a new low

« on: October 22, 2014, 11:29:16 PM »

nobody said that

So aloveuality is the same thing as having low libido...