61
Off Topic / Re: Let's explore what 'Blockland' could mean...
« on: June 11, 2018, 07:04:54 AM »
fake no pine tree
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
62
Drama / Re: Pino [BLID: 34728] | Using exploits in Rising Lava
« on: June 09, 2018, 10:05:03 AM »The images work me, even the ones in the OP work (and you cant edit drama). Maybe you should check your own stuff before making a jab at someone.I mean, they dont work for me either
But nevertheless, /support
Exploits like this are trash and whoever uses them as an advantage is trash, but seeing as it's Talos/Luxem, I didn't expect anything less than this
63
Off Topic / Re: FBI agent accidentally shoots man after doing backflip
« on: June 05, 2018, 08:07:47 AM »
Next thing you know MM and Tony will be talking about armed young gay frog trafficking
64
Off Topic / Re: Youtube is on a Downward Spiral
« on: June 03, 2018, 10:56:43 AM »
Because one multiple topics aren't enough
I'm honestly think that you're trying to make these topics to get attention rather than actually trying to prove a point.
I'm honestly think that you're trying to make these topics to get attention rather than actually trying to prove a point.
65
Help / Re: onActivate is Admin only?
« on: June 01, 2018, 01:32:38 PM »
I've had this problem a few years back, and it seems that Event_Owner had broken it for me.
66
Off Topic / Re: Clipular is Better than Sharex
« on: June 01, 2018, 05:36:05 AM »But i never need a screen recorder
OH BOY I CANT WAIT TO CHAT ON AN IMAGE CAPTURING PROGRAM
Oh wait this topic is probably bait nvm
67
Off Topic / Re: Roseanne Cancelled, Jobs lost over SJW bullstuff
« on: June 01, 2018, 05:32:06 AM »
Matthew thinks he's smarter than everyone and tries to bullstuff his way through an argument, rerun 5261
Up next, Matthew says he has enough, and leaves for 2 hours
I swear you have the worst case of tunnel-vision ever, dude
Up next, Matthew says he has enough, and leaves for 2 hours
I swear you have the worst case of tunnel-vision ever, dude
68
Off Topic / Re: Youtube is a Monopoly
« on: May 24, 2018, 08:45:03 AM »
Matthew you're getting towards Lord Tony quality posts just stop
69
Add-Ons / Re: Event_SetBotName
« on: May 19, 2018, 03:27:59 PM »
What the forget is going on in this thread
70
Off Topic / Re: My computer isn't working could imglite pro be behind it?
« on: May 16, 2018, 02:10:48 PM »
There's thousands of other reasons as to why your computer BSoD'ed, and it is not likely to be some imagehosting website
Boot into advanced startup, safemode, open up a command prompt and type "sfc /scannow"
Seriously dude, take off your tinfoil hat and google this stuff
Boot into advanced startup, safemode, open up a command prompt and type "sfc /scannow"
Seriously dude, take off your tinfoil hat and google this stuff
71
Off Topic / Re: Net Neutrality Ends Today
« on: April 23, 2018, 06:16:51 PM »They already do this though. Pre-net neutrality you still pay for the package of all services being offered, they dont have to charge you for this package of services, its just an extra fee that they tack on to their universal plan to make more money. Post-net neutrality will still have the same exact fees that they add to packages of services, which again are completely arbitrary and unnecessary. The only difference is that the customer will have a choice over packages and CAN save money. If you compare the two, different customers can save different amounts of money or end up spending more. Just like cellular plans, you pick whichever provider and plan works best for you, and theres a lot of competition so you have a healthy selection to choose from.The ISP does NOT pay more for all websites. There is no grouping of certain services, the ISP provides access to a universal, centralized service, not just one website. The ISP does not pay more to give the client access to everything. There is no service with access to certain websites. If you have access to the internet, you should have access to everything.
Then you can pick a different ISP that might charge less for their gaming package, if say you're a gamer and you want to fully utilize the gaming services. You'd still end up paying for it anyways in the universal package, its just since you're only given a net fee of all the services combined you can't actually see how much you're paying for each package that exists inside the universal plan.In the majority of the US, there is no competition. In my town, in New York, there is only 2 providers of internet, Spectrum and Frontier (for DSL only). They charge you an overly large fee (~$60/mo) for what little they provide (100:10). Since there is no competition in my area, not only the price will continue to gradually increase, but my choices will also be limited more and more once my ISP finds out that there's nothing to stop it. If you give these corporations the ability to charge you for access to websites they can previously give you for no increase in price, without any sort of competition whatsoever, the freedom to do so will give them the opportunity to either force you to pay ridiculous amounts of money for access to those sites, or not give you the opportunity to access the websites.
72
Off Topic / Re: Net Neutrality Ends Today
« on: April 23, 2018, 05:24:59 PM »not if i opt out of buying whatever packages i dont use. like honestly i dont even listen to music i could easily just avoid buying the music package and save like $10
net neutrality basically centralizes all internet services into one bulk package that you pay like $40 a month for but you only end up using like 5% of the package by the end of the month. so if you're someone who never watches movies just, like, dont pay for the movie package and now your monthly bill is like $30 dollars. or maybe you arent a gamer, dont buy the gamer package. $20
if you use every service at once 24/7 then yea obviously its going to cost you maybe $5 more than if you were to use the universal package while net neutrality existed
In the case of a network where the client's requests are universal, opting in and out of certain websites to your preference to save money shouldn't be necessary. The ISP is not spending any money providing or denying service to another website alone, and therefore should not be able to throttle your access to said website. The ISP shouldn't be able to charge you to another section of the internet because they do not own it, or spend money on providing the client with a connection to that service.
you're paying for bandwidth and the packages all included into the plan. with net neutrality gone you'll still pay for bandwidth you want but you'll also have the option to pay for the packages you want as well. you could potentially save a lot of money if you're someone who only uses specialized packages like news only, or maybe music only, etc.
Again, bandwidth that you use for certain services are universal, the ISP doesn't spend any money giving the client a universal connection to all the services. This isn't cable, in where the company that provides you the cable owns the network of channels that are broadcast. I should not pay more to access another section of the internet because the provider doesn't spend any more resources providing the client with connection to any certain website.
74
Off Topic / Re: Really dumb ideas thread
« on: April 20, 2018, 08:31:21 PM »Discussing politics on a Lego Forum
Discussing politics with anyone on the internet
