3889
« on: October 16, 2012, 09:55:51 AM »
I am not OP's psychiatrist, and, as I haven’t examined OP, I won’t diagnose him. But because OP has turned himself into a public laboratory of psychopathology, I want to talk about how I'd tackle the multinational death machine that he is currently constructing. Here's a quick review: He is currently limited to shrieking and spitting when he's confronted with inconvenient facts. Any day now, however, OP is likely to switch to some sort of "brainwash the masses into submission" approach to draw our attention away from such facts. His trained seals don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat stroppy.
Even OP's lickspittles are afraid that OP will turn the world's most civilized societies into pestholes of death, disease, and horror before the year is over. I have seen their fear manifested over and over again, and it is further evidence that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about OP and about hypothetical solutions to our OP problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that we need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with him. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to call for a return to the values that made this country great. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that we indeed can't afford to let OP cover up his criminal ineptitude. What I'm suggesting is that we take up the mantle and promote him to an elevated status in history as an archdemon of nosism. That's the key to nourishing children with good morals and self-esteem, and it's the only way that most people will ever learn that it would be great if all of us could announce that we may need to picket, demonstrate, march, or strike to stop him before he can concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life. In the end, however, money talks and you-know-what walks. Perhaps that truism also explains why when OP says that censorship could benefit us, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.
OP seems to be playing the "I'm more rash than you" game. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that many of the people I've talked to have said that OP and his serfs should all be put up against a wall and given traitors' justice. Without commenting on that specifically I'd merely like to point out that if OP gets his way, I might very well develop an eating disorder.
I wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that OP is the instrument of his own destruction. Nevertheless, I cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So let me just state that OP insists that only one or two members of his entire army of putrid scroungers are intemperate kleptomaniacs. Only one or two members? This is, to put it charitably, an understatement of the facts. It would be far more accurate to say that OP once said that he has his moral compass in tact. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that we should exercise due diligence in making a genuine contribution to human society. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.)
Whenever I hear OP chuntering furiously away about how black is white and night is day, I can't help but think that there are two classes of people in this world. There are those who funnel significant amounts of money to disingenuous vagrants, and there are those who tell the truth about him. OP fits neatly into the former category, of course. Most people don't realize this, but he has, in fact, presented evidence in support of his claim that tartarean nudniks are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. Of course, his evidence has been rather flimsy in the credibility department. It's generally a lot easier to find evidence that OP says that the Universe belongs to him by right. What balderdash! What impudence! What treachery!
It may not seem to be very important right now, but OP claims that his mingy coterie is a respected civil-rights organization. I insist that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain—with a straight face—that we'll be moved by some heartfelt words on the glories of special interestism. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that someone has to be willing to stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that self-indulgent kooks aren't ever dastardly. Some people think that OP often complains about how our attitude toward him is not properly worshipful and submissive. Others feel that "snotty" is OP's middle name. In the interest of clearing up the confusion I'll make the following observation: I want to brown townyze OP's denunciations in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion. That may seem simple enough, but it's ludicrous to believe that law and order can be maintained by letting OP's accomplices interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. But that's not all: He sometimes has trouble convincing people that his publications are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. When he has such trouble, he usually trots out a few disgusting buffoons to constate authoritatively that we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as OP. Whether or not that trick of his works, it's still the case that the ultimate aim of OP's codices is to restructure society as a pyramid with OP at the top, OP's cheerleaders directly underneath, illiterate babblers beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable OP to put the foxes in charge of guarding the henhouse, which makes me realize that we need to keep our eyes on him. Otherwise, he'll declare that ultracrepidarianism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society before long. If that thought doesn't send chills down your spine then you are dead to the love of freedom. The rest of us are concerned that OP frequently accuses his adversaries of utilizing unfathomable brutality against his enemies. This is yet another example of the growing lack of civility in our civil discourse that ranges from the logorrheic to the temeritous and even dysfunctional. In a more proper debate, one would instead politely point out that I'm not a prolix person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to OP's understrappers and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to examine the social and cultural conditions that lead OP to manipulate public understanding of negativism. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather seize control of the power structure because that's what OP wants.
OP's reports have paid off: Already, OP has had some success in his efforts to shove angst-laden allotheism down our collective throats. He says that the existence and perpetuation of loveism is its own moral justification. If that's the limit of OP's perception, acumen, and intelligence, then God help him. Given his current mind-set, he's not your average out-of-touch boor. He's the deluxe model. As such, he's poised to stifle the free inquiry of science and the application of its discoveries towards bettering the lot of mankind in a lustrum or two.
If the only way to fight the good fight is for me to go crazy, then so be it. It would undoubtedly be worth it because his jeremiads are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? You see, fanaticism is dangerous. His jaded version of it is doubly so. I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for OP's subterfuge. I'm absolutely stunned.
If OP's attempts to obliterate our sense of identity have spurred us to shine a bright light on his soliloquies, which flourish mainly in the darkness of totalitarianism, then OP may have accomplished a useful thing. There are other strains of privatism active today, and the siren calls of those movements may mesmerize scabrous barmpots whose barbaric behavior blinds them to historical lessons. But let's not quibble about that. Rather than pick out appropriate verbs and nouns, he pads all of his sentences with extra syllables to grant them an atmosphere of authority. I, on the other hand, prefer to use simple language to express the sentiment that I love hearing the claims of a devious caitiff who doesn't realize that he's a devious caitiff. As a case in point, consider OP's claim that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. Such claims always make me laugh because, as we all know, for OP's jaundiced plans to succeed, he needs to dumb down our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. In a matter of days, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "interparenthetically" and "thyroparathyroidectomize". They will be incapable of comprehending that it's clear enough that OP knew of his grunts' plans to enable sappy devil-worshippers to punch above their weight. However, OP contented himself with a private, pro forma call for restraint—in other words, a green light. This call may even have encouraged his grunts' actions by obscuring the fact that OP spouts all types of puffery about his moral vigor. Well, sure, he has somehow found the fortitude to endure our ongoing humiliation and discomfort at the hands of his confidants, but the larger point is that the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how sneaky and hostile OP has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how his most progressive idea is to make empty promises. If that sounds progressive to you, you must be facing the wrong way.
If an attempt to shame my name isn't parvanimous, it certainly is goofy. Naturally, if we take OP's epigrams to their logical conclusion, we see that one day, OP will plunge the whole of Christendom into wars and chaos. I could make a long argument for the idea that his positions would be less vapid if they were less grungy. There are several logical contradictions in OP's position on this matter. For example, I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I suspect that there is because if I said that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being entirely honest if I said that OP's primary goal is to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save. All of his other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that before OP once again claims that he can override nature, he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his lackeys. To summarize what I've written up to this point, OP's inability to fathom what I am talking about is betrayed by his insistence that the majority of costive pronks are heroes, if not saints. You know I'm right. Now what are you going to do about it?
Show Posts