106
Off Topic / Re: brickadia is going into early access 2023
« on: December 18, 2022, 12:24:33 AM »if you go be tribal modern warfare 2 you will be bannedlmao
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
107
Off Topic / Re: brickadia is going into early access 2023
« on: December 17, 2022, 05:11:11 PM »
< say word
< money stolen
108
Off Topic / Re: What happen to tony?
« on: November 30, 2022, 04:30:46 PM »
cracking up nix is a hero for bumping that thread
109
Off Topic / Re: what changes as you grow older?
« on: November 19, 2022, 09:38:03 AM »there is something seriously wrong with me that is undiagnosed
it's called egocentrism, it usually stops around age 7
110
Add-Ons / Re: [Event] Save Datablock
« on: November 16, 2022, 04:31:11 PM »re-download if u got v2, v3 fixes a missing )if(isObject(%client.savedDatablock && $Pref::Server::RestorePlayerDatablocksOnResp awn $= true))
added a server pref $Pref::Server::RestorePlayerDatablocksOnResp awn set to false if you ever need to disable loading saved player datablock on respawn
You put the second statement within the isObject check, so it will always return false. Pushing out requests super quick is nice, but you should really test your addon before you go through the effort of uploading and posting it.
111
Off Topic / Re: What would be better, forum archive or a complete erasure
« on: October 21, 2022, 04:32:11 PM »
It would be nice if at the very least you could dump the stuff you said before you turned 18. I always found it kinda pathetic how little responsibility Badspot took in maintaining the privacy of little kids.
112
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 08, 2022, 09:09:34 PM »
Yeah if you can access the site the archive is pinned at the top of the thread
113
Off Topic / Re: Where the forget did badspot tell us to milk the piss out of our roosters????
« on: September 08, 2022, 03:02:08 PM »
Wasn’t that Garry Newman on Facepunch or his blog or something? Swore he had an entire essay dedicated to it
114
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 08, 2022, 02:16:09 PM »
I know one of the big archive sites already caved and pulled their stuff. The entire forum is backed up but it’s kinda useless without a 3rd party
115
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 08, 2022, 01:48:38 PM »
I mean keffals literally just demonstrated how to get any and all evidence of your wrongdoings struck from the internet by flogging people with the press so I imagine that instills some confidence
Oh yeah totally dude. You can see the archived evidence on KiwiFa-… Oh…
If this is true it pretty much throws Keffals entire movement out the window
Oh yeah totally dude. You can see the archived evidence on KiwiFa-… Oh…
116
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 08, 2022, 12:41:29 PM »I'm not fond of keffals either but this is a stretch
I mean it operates on the idea that the screen cap is real but yeah loving with someone and their entire family is basically the opposite of everything I’ve spoken about the last couple pages
117
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 08, 2022, 11:02:03 AM »Keffals is a hypocrite who investigatees children, color me surprised.
Not to mention encouraged swatting on Twitter. The real kicker is that this vile scumbag’s behavior is literally unacceptable by KF standards.
118
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 06, 2022, 08:12:25 PM »
This thread is just /qa/ all over again
119
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 06, 2022, 04:36:10 PM »
I don't expect much from you at all
120
Off Topic / Re: blf might outlast kiwi farms lmao
« on: September 06, 2022, 11:04:57 AM »
KF should just rebrand as an anime research site where discussion of people occasionally occurs by chance in the off topic section
Iban has his own thread on KF where he has been relentlessly mocked for his weirdo creep stuff and the stocking insanity. He doesn’t make any attempt to hide it. He’s not morally arbitrating across KF; it’s not the point of the website. KF is literally just a place where you discuss people, it’s not a place where you pursue justice and accountability.
This is where the strange term “lolcow” comes from. The people discussed on KF provide endless laughs from the absurdity of their degenerate and cringeworthy behavior. KF users post behavior that is funny or entertaining, not behavior that is “morally wrong” by the standards of some admin sponsored political faction. They routinely reestablish the idea that it’s better to not disturb the subjects in real life, not for plausible deniability from the press (with whom it wouldn’t matter anyway because the press has no integrity), but because participation in the behavior of “lolcows” ruins the authenticity. Similarly, if you push someone into hiding, they’ll stop talking, and you can’t laugh at them anymore. Same thing if they kill themselves.
This is the general MO of the website, I can’t account for the actions of every user, but compare this to Twitter which has historically had several different slogans dedicated to the idea of hunting people down in real life and implementing consequences for their online utterances - no holds barred; these people have gone after minors, in highly politically adversarially ways in which they actually are acting as self appointed moral arbiters. If discussing regular people in high-ish profile public arenas can be considered culpable for enabling destructive behavior, then half of the press and most of Twitter needs to disappear immediately. And if that is the conclusion the internet comes to, meh. KF can stay down.
We need to make a distinction for what constitutes private information. Obviously, you shouldn’t go on KF and post someone’s bank password and SSN. Mainly because it’s completely illegal, but also because it has absolutely no entertainment value. As far as I could tell before the site went down, I didn’t see things like peoples addresses being posted, because for the aforementioned reasons, it goes against typical KF interests.
But how much of someone’s behavior is private? If you post something on Twitter for the entire world to see, how much time has to pass before it becomes too private to archive? How much investigation can you do into readily and legally available information before it becomes “private” or “private investigating”?
@crook/mr. bones although you bring up valid points, i think there is an argument to be had that kf enabled those stuffty people to do those things by allowing the publication of other people's personal information without repercussion. you can say that theres a benefit in that kf have targeted genuinely bad people, but what kf identifies as a "bad person" can include people who haven't actually done anything seriously wrong, and vice versa. i personally wouldn't trust iban (or anyone i only know online, for that matter) to be impartial, ethical, or fair in drawing that line as the site administrator, given the lack of accountability except in extremely egregious situations.
Iban has his own thread on KF where he has been relentlessly mocked for his weirdo creep stuff and the stocking insanity. He doesn’t make any attempt to hide it. He’s not morally arbitrating across KF; it’s not the point of the website. KF is literally just a place where you discuss people, it’s not a place where you pursue justice and accountability.
This is where the strange term “lolcow” comes from. The people discussed on KF provide endless laughs from the absurdity of their degenerate and cringeworthy behavior. KF users post behavior that is funny or entertaining, not behavior that is “morally wrong” by the standards of some admin sponsored political faction. They routinely reestablish the idea that it’s better to not disturb the subjects in real life, not for plausible deniability from the press (with whom it wouldn’t matter anyway because the press has no integrity), but because participation in the behavior of “lolcows” ruins the authenticity. Similarly, if you push someone into hiding, they’ll stop talking, and you can’t laugh at them anymore. Same thing if they kill themselves.
This is the general MO of the website, I can’t account for the actions of every user, but compare this to Twitter which has historically had several different slogans dedicated to the idea of hunting people down in real life and implementing consequences for their online utterances - no holds barred; these people have gone after minors, in highly politically adversarially ways in which they actually are acting as self appointed moral arbiters. If discussing regular people in high-ish profile public arenas can be considered culpable for enabling destructive behavior, then half of the press and most of Twitter needs to disappear immediately. And if that is the conclusion the internet comes to, meh. KF can stay down.
the more i think about this post the more i feel that yes, it is our responsibility to prevent the distribution of personal information. besides the fact it goes against the idea of "information privacy is a value people should respect" when talking about corporations which collect user data and sell it, it is the social equivalent of giving everyone a gun specifically made to let you shoot the victim. the vast majority of people will not shoot the gun. a few will take it too far. even fewer will actually mete out a fair amount of vigilante justice, if thats possible to even define. and most likely, none of those few will factor in that others may have already dealt fair punishment, and that they may be adding on undue excess punishment as a result.
We need to make a distinction for what constitutes private information. Obviously, you shouldn’t go on KF and post someone’s bank password and SSN. Mainly because it’s completely illegal, but also because it has absolutely no entertainment value. As far as I could tell before the site went down, I didn’t see things like peoples addresses being posted, because for the aforementioned reasons, it goes against typical KF interests.
But how much of someone’s behavior is private? If you post something on Twitter for the entire world to see, how much time has to pass before it becomes too private to archive? How much investigation can you do into readily and legally available information before it becomes “private” or “private investigating”?