Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
No, guns should cost what it costs to manufacture them plus a reasonable profit for the manufacturer. Your idea still does not account for illegal weapons already here.
(1)Then please, lay it out for me.To address 1;
(2)But it also puts me at risk. So that's infringing on the personal rights that libertarians seem love so much.
But I don't want the guy next to me to have a quick and easy way to kill me. It is within my personal freedoms to fear for my life.Libertarianism calls for minimal government, with individuals managing and allocating their own resources where they see fit. I don't think you know what libertarians stand for, to be honest.
Right, but what if there is a third person. He has gold.
That means that he doesn't get to eat because we were too loving selfish. But, what if each person donated half of their resources to the "pot" (Like in poker)
But, we need someone to fairly distribute these resources, so that we don't have selfish starfishs.
And that's a government. But, what if our single man is too selfish himself? So let's get a few more. Infact, let's ask the entire tribe who they would prefer. Now we have voting! But we need more than one person to choose how the resources are divided, right?
So you are the guy with gold. You are thankful that these people see rationality. (people on welfare)
But I am the guy with the fish, or the guy with the logs. I say we loving drown that greedy motherforgeter and toss his body in a ditch.
Ah, see. That's not anarchy. But I was under the impression that you meant all government.I've labeled your points for more clear reference here. As I've said before, the beauty of being able to own firearms in this country, as perfectly stated by Thomas Jefferson is as follows; "The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." We will never need to use our weapons against a government until they start taking away rights from the people. As citizens of this country it is our right as intended by the founding fathers to have the means to rebel and establish a society we see as being more fit.
(1)But I don't agree with every right in the constitution. Just because some guy 250 years ago thought that loving gunhead Joe next door should have his automatic assault rifle, I don't agree.
(2)No one wants to loving pay taxes.
Yeah, but in this system apparently nobody has to pay taxes, so how are these services provided if no citizens are paying taxes or fees to any 3rd parties?Correction: Citizens aren't forced to pay fees to third parties.
But I can claim whatever property I wish to. And if someone says, "No, that's my property!", Then I feel like my right to infinite property is being violated.Nope, you rightfully own what you produce with your own hands.
and im paying for all the losers in the country who are to handicapped to take care of themselves.And stupid-as-stuff wars. When did the Department of Defense start becoming the Department of Invasion?
and i am paying for stuffloads of war i dont want.
and im paying for bailouts to companies that were already cheating me anyways.
You are moving with your family right?When did I ever say I would own all the property and have all the liberties? You own what you produce and nothing more. You would have the right to minimal government interference and you would be free to use your time doing whatever you pleased so long as your actions were not aggressive to another human being.
So you're saying that you should own all of the property? And be free to do whatever you want? But, what about my property? And my liberties? You get all of them and I get none?
Having everybody completely equal in a government would never work under any circumstances. Man B can deal with it and hope that he gets voted to a better position next term.I never stated we would have equal government, I stated that I believe humanity is better self governed than governed by an entity which will never truly know his needs.
Since you are so great at earning your keep, why don't you live somewhere free of government? Like deep in the rainforest or in Antarctica. If you can survive urban life I'm sure you will be equally adept at living in the wild.That's a ridiculous statement to make. Humans are social creatures and require interaction with others. I'm saying humans should not be able to rob each other of property or liberties under the guise of governing them, and no human should ever hold more power than the next by a popular vote. Power comes from work.
Man B can leave whenever he wants.Where is Man B to go? Is he simply to abandon his livelihood and endlessly drift like Odysseus, never finding a suitable place to settle down, instead having to return home to the same problems?
-snip-All governments are made up of people. I just find the concept of giving one man more power than the next, by vote or any other method, is unnatural and immoral.
it relates pretty well, im linking it because it contains some dead people (rather blurry though)Taking away guns is taking away the people's defense against tyranny and oppression.
-snip-
So when exactly does defying the government start? And how?Defying authority is already in our hearts. We're all born to defy authority, but we've been artificially molded into conformity. Our molds will all break, but we all have different tolerances. My tolerance is low, and my mold is broken. Defiance doesn't mean senseless murder.
We apparently have the right to rebellion, but no one has taken down the tyranny yet?Rebellion happens when the people are ready
