Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
when btc collapses due to its tech problems what coin do you guys think'll benefit the most from the demand vacuum? or do you think it'll hurt crypto in generalETH probably, it's the most suitable for replacement right now at least.
Honestly that's the same thing people said about Ethereum before it was fully working. It's not really something worth arguing over, either it'll happen at some point and be better or it won't.Yeah I understand there's no point in arguing over it haha
It's superior to ethereum, ethereum is a slow and expensive blockchain. You pay for every operation executed on the smart contracts. EOS will support 100.000-1.000.000 transactions per second, as apposed to ethereum's 15 or something. Also in EOS you won't need to pay to use a service or execute code. You put in a stake of your tokens to get access to a portion of the resources. You can have entire applications running on EOS that are indistinguishable from traditional centralized applications.Sounds really promising, the thing is their development is lacking rn, can you give me a timeline of what their future looks like?
The lead developer of EOS, Daniel Larimer was also responsible for BitShares and Steemit, Steemit works similarly to how EOS applications and their blockchains will work. (Steemit is a social network running on blockchain technology that pays its users to use it.)
You could run the entire Ethereum network on a single EOS contract if you wanted to..
To me, this is the future of blockchain.
EOS is where it's at, believe itEOS is basically ethereum if I understand correctly lol
yup, you got it.this is why you need scalability and privacy
satoshi solving the double-spending crCIA & byz. general problem will always be a good thing. btc was revolutionary for its time.
but that was 09, its now 17. time moves quick.
crypto in itself sounds like a very bad investment to me. i don't know why, but it just seems like a bad idea.if you don't know anything about the tech, you have no reason to spread this garbage uninformed opinion
ethereum is aids and is practically being handled by children>bitcoin hardfork cancelled by 6, COUNT THEM, 6 people
so uh why should we believe you? are you just stating your speculation?It's not speculation it's fact.
I'm glad you found one article where somebody who is at-least not an irrelevant nobody or renowned dumbass to say "gravity doesn’t exist" for the purpose of attention, but it's very clear that you have no idea what this article is saying, because it's agreeing that gravity exists, but saying it is an entropic force as opposed to a fundamental force. It doesn't say anything about my sandwich falling down when I drop it because it's "denser than air", that makes no sense.this is the first time I 100% agree with you
Here is the wikipedia article about the theory, and it is unsurprisingly very much a theory. It literally says "The theory of entropic gravity abides by Newton's law of universal gravitation on earth and at interplanetary distances". I'm assuming you're switching your argument over to "Gravity is an entropic force" from "Gravity doesn't exist" now?
You're going to actually have to present your argument in your own words, and not just link to some NYTimes article that is 80% biography and 20% pseudoscience, if you want anyone to take this seriously.
