Messages

781

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 02:13:27 PM »

this brown townogy works. i agree with it. but the conversation that was going on before mus walked in and stomped around complaining a lot was essentially everyone in this thread whipping their richards out and comparing sizes.

right here:mus, in the same sense as takato's brown townogy, just walked into a closed off room, saw a bunch of dudes comparing snake length and then complained about human indecency rather than turn around and walk right back out of the door.

mus isn't wrong (mostly), he's an starfish for thinking his opinion needed to be heard when the discussion was hurting no one and he should have just ignored it.

ok but the problem here is that even though the door is closed, there's a sign on it (the thread topic) that tells him what is supposed to be going on in the room behind it

in this case the sign on the door was lying, he walks in here expecting one thing and finds another

this is the OC megathread, not the discuss your special interestes megathread, he had every right to express his distaste at the topic of discussion when it wasn't what the sign told him it was

would you be happy if you saw a coffee house with a sign that said "free TV and WiFi" and when you walked in they had neither of those things

or a restaurant with a sign that says "all you can eat pancakes" and instead got an all you can eat salad bar

782

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 02:30:08 AM »

Because some people don't go apestuff whenever I mention the word special interest or love.

"Some people react this way so all people must also react the same way"

This is a forum, you converse in a forum. We aren't posting research. We asked eachother. We barely posted anything.

You didn't "ask each other", someone pointed out you and buu had similar tastes (which is a completely ambiguous and harmless statement), and then you proceeded to make a distinct list of special interestes that you KNOW a lot of people would find weird or disturbing.

"This is a forum"

It's a public social interaction, the fact that it's on the internet is a formality. You wouldn't go to a party and say "Hi, my name is bob, and I think scat is loving HOT", don't loving do it here. Have common courtesy.

783

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 02:16:24 AM »

My healthy reminder, don't stir stuff.

wow you're such a loving hypocrite

bringing up polarizing topics (like loveuality) is the very DEFINITION of stirring stuff

Yet you refused to review mine.

basically what you're trying to say is that it's alright to post whatever we want as long as we're not breaking any rules

you must have nary a loving clue what social etiquette is

784

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 02:11:20 AM »

I'm not ignoring anything, I answered your points and you refuse to acknowledge.

ok you did it NOW but only after making him repeat himself several times and completely loving spell it out for you

785

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 02:09:04 AM »

I'm not ignoring anything

you ignored it for an entire loving page

786

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 02:06:35 AM »

And resulting to insults... mature.

it's one thing to insult someone when you're out of arguments

but it's entirely different when your point is being completely loving ignored

787

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 02:03:57 AM »

But we were asking and conversing from there, that's the part where I turn against mus's point. This was triggered by a couple of us curious by eachothers affinities. So I don't really see what point your trying to make here.

KEEP IT TO YOUR loving SELVES

788

Creativity / Re: OC megathread - ok here you go

« on: July 27, 2014, 01:58:23 AM »

ok normally I wouldnt take mus's side

but your loveual preferences are your own business and absolutely <no one> elses, you don't loving talk about what makes you hard, and you don't ASK someone what makes them hard, that's not how this stuff works

a special interest is like a snake, it's fine to have one, its alright to be proud of it, but it's wise to refrain from whipping it out in public and start flailing it around like a flag

789

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: July 27, 2014, 12:48:51 AM »

no, evolution is a thing, and that is why it doesn't make sense

it's not completely unfeasible

reptiles and mammals evolved independently, but everything starts somewhere

dragons could've been a mutation involving the genetic materials of both reptiles and mammals, I know they can't mate but something else could have happened

790

Off Topic / Re: Dogs Megathread - "101 Dalmatians" posts and still going

« on: July 27, 2014, 12:45:22 AM »

if dogs tried to take over the world tbh i think they could pull it off

too bad they're not capable of organizing such a thing

791

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: July 27, 2014, 12:44:00 AM »

yeah but that doesn't make any sense either

because evolution isn't a thing :/

792

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: July 27, 2014, 12:39:39 AM »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemisnake

A hemisnake is a snake

well
that doesn't really make any sense anyway
reptiles didn't become mammals

im not saying they did, I'm saying dragons have features of both mammals and reptiles so it's a logical inference that their genitalia could be a mashup of the two

I'm not complaining about dragons having snakees or anything
I'm totally into that
but if realism is what we're talking about, it doesn't make sense

well, I mean like, as close to realism as it can get considering the fact that it's fiction

it does make sense though

793

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: July 27, 2014, 12:27:46 AM »

still, they're not really snakees

yes they are wtf

they definitely don't look the way people draw them

there is some creative control to be given when drawing a fictional species that has characteristics of more than one animal kingdom

there's also the third set of features to consider for anthropomorphic varieties

794

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: July 27, 2014, 12:23:20 AM »

yeah but they're on the inside

... yes, and when they're in use they're on the outside

whats your point

795

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: July 27, 2014, 12:22:00 AM »

if you're into richards and you want to loveualize them, then ya

what

reptiles have reproductive organs

seriously what