3676
Off Topic / Re: Opinions on radicals of any type
« on: April 22, 2016, 09:46:06 PM »
in terms of physical destructiveness, radical religious people, radical oppressors.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Wait what's panloveualit means gender/love plays no role in your decision of "do i wanna do the nasties with this person"
What do the doctors look for? Is there a chemical imbalance in the body? Like a man is producing far more estrogen then what is normal or whatever? And if so wouldn't it be easier and less dangerous for them to take medication so that they are comfortable with the gender they really have?it's differences in how the brain is wired
Isn't it illegal to put spyware and malware in a program? Where is the source of this?they say it's for "complying with law enforcement and providing better service to users" which is a legal thing to do if you put it in your privacy policy (which they have, but nobody reads them)
It indeed has spyware and malware. Just look up a tutorial how to remove the win 10 spies and you should be good.there are some that cant be disabled unfortunately
Not a rule, but a norm. It's really a matter of point of view.When you get right down to it, a norm and a probability are really the same thing.
Also I'm fairly certain that the aggressiveness in males is intended primarily for mating. I can cite a source if needed.
The males that don't experience that instinct are either defective or haven't had the chance to exercise the need to fight in their life.The fight/flight reaction is not exclusive to males, and even then, how males react to these situations differs drastically between people. You might have one which gets enraged and fights and another who runs away in fear. That's why it's called a "fight or flight" reaction. So again, it's a probability, not a rule.
Men are biologically hardwired to like punching stuffThey're not though. If you take the average of all males, there's a higher probability, but it's just a probability. It doesn't apply at all to individuals. You can't say "Men as a whole have a biological instinct to kill things for food, so this random dude over here must have that instinct too." Sure, it's slightly more likely, but that doesn't make it true. Eveyone's different in drastic ways.
Men tend to be more violent ("society xdddddd")
stuff like that