Messages

3766

Off Topic / Re: How long have you been on the forums?

« on: August 26, 2011, 09:15:37 PM »

3 years in September.

3767

Off Topic / Re: Post real life pictures of yourself.

« on: August 26, 2011, 05:39:51 PM »

hi mexican

3768

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 05:38:38 PM »

That was meant to be loveual. I mean come on, posting a picture of yourself in a nurse outfit on a lego forum full of horny little kids. That's just asking for it.

3769

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 05:26:32 PM »

Yet I am perverted because I am chain loveual.

I don't like this world.

You just automatically think things are love related when they are not.

3770

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 05:22:55 PM »

I could've sworn in a game server somewhere you said you could swing both ways. Correct me if I'm wrong. (which i seem to be terribly) :U

Err that was not me.

3771

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 05:19:42 PM »

buddy, ning's bi. you know what that means? that means she'll go all around, and viewpoints pretty much just stand in the way. a body does not define the psyche, you could be the case of a few people we've had over the years, where they're (supposedly) a love of one trapped in the body of the opposite.

when did I... what.

3772

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 05:03:00 PM »

Also considering the fact that Ningyou does not have a snake, she wouldn't know my interpretation of loveuality.

Oh you're loveist now too, cool.

3773

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 04:05:46 PM »

and if nude photography isn't loveual why did you just say fashion which is art like the photography can be loveual?

I meant that most will interpret it as loveual, but they shouldn't.

3774

Off Topic / Re: Going to grandparents this weekend

« on: August 26, 2011, 03:58:03 PM »

Wish my grandparents were still alive.

3775

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 03:53:53 PM »

Dodger did you ever see or heard of a photographer who only photographs naked people? Would you find this loveual? It isn't, it's considered art. There's nothing wrong with the human body being exposed if it's for the sake of art.

Have you ever heard of special interestes?

My God, is that really all you can think about? Jesus Christ.

3776

Off Topic / Re: How Much do You Respect the Above User?

« on: August 26, 2011, 03:44:27 PM »

9/10

3777

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 03:40:42 PM »

It's tight on her. Plus the addition of the chains to it can invoke loveual thought in people still. Just because it's considered fashion doesn't mean it will be considered clean by all people.

No, only perverts like you would think so. That's exactly what I mean by "decent people wouldn't think of that". Fashion can be loveual, it's art. There's a difference between a whore and a creative person who likes art.

3778

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 03:34:47 PM »

Define "decent", because the last 2 pictures aren't exactly tame. What else do you think about when you see chains?

Nothing. Chains aren't particularly loveual, nor is leather. I have a leather jacket, ohoho that's so loveual of me!

3779

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 03:31:05 PM »

Besides I don't see how chains on the hips are loveually arousing in any way. If it was like this collar with chains on it, now that would be different.

3780

Off Topic / Re: Hot Girls

« on: August 26, 2011, 03:28:04 PM »

Chains and leather totally don't arouse people, especially those with special interestes for stiff like bondage.

You can pose feces (for an example) in a fancy setting and try to make it look nice and polish it up but it's still stuff.

I didn't even think about bondage. I don't think any decent people would.