46
Off Topic / Re: Weather Megathread
« on: June 21, 2014, 09:24:03 PM »
but rain is good
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
48
Off Topic / Re: Anime and Manga Megathread
« on: June 21, 2014, 08:54:42 PM »http://thebest404pageever.com/swf/wipe_faster.swfthis is literally the best thing
what is it from anyway
49
Games / Re: SCP Phone Number FOUND???!?!?!?
« on: June 21, 2014, 08:47:01 PM »its fakethat's what they want you to think
50
Off Topic / Re: read this story it is sad
« on: June 21, 2014, 08:21:23 PM »Here's something to laugh at now. Might cheer ya up. inb4pagestretch idcway better than the story in the op
The page order is left to right.
51
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here
« on: June 21, 2014, 07:56:19 PM »covered in latex for rest of image but i figured the nips were to pronounced and would be counted as illegal.pm it to me
straight forces being overwhelmedyou know nothing
52
Music / Re: Some Surgeon Simulator Loops
« on: June 21, 2014, 03:34:39 AM »This is one of the slowest boards on the entire forum. Have some patience.to be fair, he waited five days
53
Off Topic / Re: Post real life pictures of yourself.
« on: June 21, 2014, 03:11:05 AM »guys i went to my first drag show tonight and i think im a hundred times gayer nowhave you reached the limit or no
54
Off Topic / Re: Google's new attempt at stopping "loveism" activities. This time its code.
« on: June 21, 2014, 02:42:44 AM »Problem is you /can't/ do that unless you actually learn how to code stuff, and so what has the website actually done to solve to problem?well, first of all, it's creating interest. you can see what programming can do without knowing how to do it yourself. I decided to learn to use HTML because I saw websites, and I wanted to be able to make my own. the websites that inspired that weren't websites with lists of resources for learning HTML. but it still did it
and secondly
https://www.madewithcode.com/resources
55
Off Topic / Re: Google's new attempt at stopping "loveism" activities. This time its code.
« on: June 21, 2014, 02:36:32 AM »Yes they are. The 'programming projects' on the website do not resemble any actual programming language. It's not even a primer for programming languages because it requires no math at all. It's definitely misinforming people because the website itself is called 'Made With Code' but absolutely none of the projects available to visitors are actually made with code.I don't think those first things are supposed to be the focus
and regardless of that, they aren't there to teach you how to code anything. the point is to show you what you can do. that's what the whole website is about
56
Off Topic / Re: Google's new attempt at stopping "loveism" activities. This time its code.
« on: June 21, 2014, 02:27:37 AM »The issue is that it's not gonna help make women any less underrepresented in STEM fields by misinforming young people about what programming actually is.but they aren't misinforming anyone
57
Off Topic / Re: Google's new attempt at stopping "loveism" activities. This time its code.
« on: June 21, 2014, 02:23:11 AM »Do you mean 'movie hacking'? If so, that's generally just used as a plot device and movies aren't actually trying to pass it off as real programming/hacking/whatever.uh
no
I mean they advertise the game as something it's not
and it works
but I don't even really see what you mean? they're showing off a lot of things that come from code. I don't get the issue
58
Off Topic / Re: Google's new attempt at stopping "loveism" activities. This time its code.
« on: June 21, 2014, 02:17:24 AM »How are you supposed to create interest in programming by presenting it as something it's completely not?isn't that what video game publishers do?
59
Off Topic / Re: Google's new attempt at stopping "loveism" activities. This time its code.
« on: June 21, 2014, 02:12:36 AM »to create interest
60
Off Topic / Re: everybody take the time to read this
« on: June 21, 2014, 02:10:09 AM »yes, but what does this have to do with the threadwell nothing, but you ignored the pm, and if you hadn't seen it, sending another wouldn't do any good, so that was out of the question, and I'm not gonna make an entire thread for it, so this was the best solution