Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Night Fox

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 4035
571
Off Topic / Re: So My Neighbors Probably Killed My Cat
« on: May 31, 2014, 03:28:24 PM »
also no one dares to avenge their family pets and to teach those people a lesson so they keep doing it and getting away with it
the law handles that. you can't just run over some living human beings because they killed a cat

572
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here
« on: May 31, 2014, 03:26:39 PM »
Offensive, yes. Oppressive, no.
The word "monday" is oppressive because it was used as a replacement for names by people who deemed them unworthy of names
"Bitch" has no such history. A link you posted directly addresses the original meaning; it's not an oppressive meaning.  Additionally, here's a few snippets from the very same links you posted:
Doesn't sound oppressive at all, quite the opposite
offensive, yes. oppressive, yes
reclaiming a slur is something that happens a lot. like gay people or bi people, etc. calling themselves "queer." it's still wrong for a straight person to call a gay person that, even if they use positively it for themselves
If you're going to argue that the use of the word "bitch" is wrong regardless of the context, then I'm just going to reply with eight pages of search results of you using the word yourself (I don't know how to link it directly, sorry)
wait, you mean I've made mistakes before?!?! no way!!
I know I've done that. and it was wrong. what's your point?

573
Off Topic / Re: So My Neighbors Probably Killed My Cat
« on: May 31, 2014, 02:40:31 PM »
"a bloo bloo bloo human life is precious"
forget off, those handicaps OP talked about are grade A sociopaths, they belong in an institution or underground.
you all seem like sociopaths too. forgetin, saying some people should die because of the possibility that they killed a cat that belonged to someone here. jesus christ
Exactly, I could give a stuff less about human life if they were dirt bags.
the only difference between you and some serial killer is that you don't disagree with your reasons for wanting them dead

575
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here
« on: May 31, 2014, 02:18:51 PM »
Then why are you making such a big deal out of it?
just because your opinion doesn't matter, doesn't mean it's okay that it's your opinion
One did speak, but you immediately dismissed her statement and herself as "trash"
Here, I asked a friend about it
what is so hard to understand about this? the fact that there are women who don't think it matters doesn't mean that the women who do think it matters can be ignored
What? But I didn't do this?
you're defending someone who did
I'm not using the words, I'm just saying it's a far stretch to label this usage as "oppressive" when multiple females have expressed no care
it's oppressive. not debatable. as for those "multiple females," see above
itt: night fox doesn't understand context
no, context just doesn't matter

576
Off Topic / Re: Acting in research ** 18+ (+/-10) only thread **
« on: May 31, 2014, 12:24:41 PM »
I'm assuming OP is straight (which he probably isn't but whatever)
and starring in a gay research video doesn't exactly make you seem like that.
what is wrong with seeming gay?

577
Off Topic / Re: Acting in research ** 18+ (+/-10) only thread **
« on: May 31, 2014, 11:53:05 AM »
Also I don't see how prostitution isn't shameful.
it just isn't. there's no reason it would be. resorting to using prostitutes, however, that's what's shameful

578
Off Topic / Re: Acting in research ** 18+ (+/-10) only thread **
« on: May 31, 2014, 11:36:51 AM »
also gay research just makes it even worse
um
how?

579
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here
« on: May 31, 2014, 11:22:51 AM »
so then why are you still following me on tumblr, huh? :)
because I like some of the things you reblog. following you on tumblr doesn't mean I like you
1 Christianity relates to everyone indirectly because it's constantly being pushed into fields that affect daily lives: politics, education, etc
2 Then maybe you shouldn't have dismissed men by saying
So let them speak, instead of dismissing their opinion as meaningless
3 Well aren't you just a fantastic, wonderful person
4 Maybe I'd agree with you if the context was "is 'bitch' a loveist term when used in an offensive matter"
But it's not
It's "is it loveist to use the word bitch as a synonym for 'whine' to describe yourself"And yes context does matter. As I said, it's one of the largest aspects of linguistics. Again, if you disagree, let the women voice their opinion.
1. no it doesn't. people do, and you can argue about the ways it relates to you all you want, but I'm pretty sure I've seen you arguing about it in ways that have no effect on you. just about the beliefs themselves being "wrong"
2. the opinion of men in this situation is meaningless. and I can't just "let them speak," they're not here. but it doesn't matter, because they already have
3. ok
4.  you can't just say something like that, then say "no I meant something entirely different!!" you can't use a word that is or was used to oppress people just because you want to

580
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here
« on: May 31, 2014, 07:18:02 AM »
So why are you talking about a subject related to women when you're not one?
And then you pretty much dismiss there opinion when foulprairiedog posts
so you can only talk about something if it relates to you? but you argue about christianity all the time??
it doesn't matter that I'm not a woman. there are many women who are offended by the word, and don't think it's okay to say. that is a fact, and it's all that matters
I explained why foulprairiedog's opinion was meaningless already. but beyond that reason, she is trash in general, and by no means a decent source for anything related to equality

581
Off Topic / Re: what are you wearing
« on: May 31, 2014, 06:00:12 AM »
That people can see you?
people generally can't see through my walls, or my door, although I understand where your confusion is coming from, since there are some parents with x-ray vision and all

582
Off Topic / Re: what are you wearing
« on: May 31, 2014, 05:23:26 AM »
Yes, but in order to get to the pants and shirt, you must walk naked.
wow...... walking naked..

what is the issue with that, exactly

583
Off Topic / Re: what are you wearing
« on: May 31, 2014, 05:20:02 AM »
but you also don't want to be stark naked in case you have to wake up for some reason
the rest of the post was just about how comfortable it is for you, but as for this bit, I'm not naked anyway like I said, but if I was, all I'd have to do is pull on a pair of pants and a shirt which takes like ten seconds, not a big deal

584
Off Topic / Re: what are you wearing
« on: May 31, 2014, 05:13:19 AM »
It's gross, for several reasons. Like, when you go to bathroom, you don't want your dong with a few drops of urine on it smearing all over your pants.
I imagine I'll put on underwear before I need to pee. but after a shower at night, why go through the trouble of putting them on for no reason?? I would just wear nothing, but my mom doesn't knock

585
Off Topic / Re: what are you wearing
« on: May 31, 2014, 05:06:20 AM »
gross
how is that gross
like if you don't take showers or something, sure, gross
but other than that??

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 [39] 40 41 42 43 44 ... 4035