DrenDran will whine and say that's a No True Scotsman logic fallacy or some stuff, but who gives a stuff.
It's wrong. I know it's wrong. But I'm doing it anyway.Not strength in the sense of physical strength, but strength as in power. Power as in having a voice and mattering as much as masculinity.
I never said strength was only physical, what a strawman lol.
But strength is an intrinsic internal property of a person, whether emotional, physical, or mental, it is not determined by external factors. There is a difference between strength and political power. I don't understand the idea of giving political power to the concept of femininity. Why do people need to be given power based on wearing dresses lipstick and high heels?
Also, MRAs have done nothing of significance since their inception in the 70s (correct me if i'm wrong here). They're too focused on attacking feminists than actually doing anything, but I'm sure there are exceptions.
Someone correct him for me plz.
I believe men are affected by a patriarchy (and would do anything in my power to help! I'd love to build a shelter for men in abusive relationships or ban circumcision! And I'm a feminist!), but MRAs believe there's a matriarchy, anyway. That's why they'll always be wrong in their ideals, but not their goals.
The whole patriarchy thing is a conspiracy theory on the level of 'global warming is invented by Obama' and 'jews did 9/11'. Yes, men typically have more power, yeah it probably wouldn't be like that in a perfect society, but the Patriarchy theory tends to make it seem like a conscious common effort on the part of men to oppress women.
edit: the problem with feminism is that it's not a centralized controlled group, it's a label people can apply to themselves, this means two feminists can disagree on everything and still both be called feminists. This is not the way to do a political movement and be taken seriously.