Show Posts

This is loving stupid...in all my time on these forums I've never seen someone copypasta rebuttal essays and plug in forum usernames.

I would count this as spam, as there's no real sense in this all. If you want to make a topic about a funny website that has a bunch of stupid argument responses that nobody would read, that would be okay, but you had to describe it to us and everything, which makes us all think you're a couple of idiots.

Don't be mad just wright a complaint.

111

Off Topic / Re: My complaint against Bobah

« on: July 16, 2011, 04:50:24 AM »

Quote from: Nickelob Ultra on July 16, 2011, 04:49:17 AM

Hey OP I tl;dr'd your entire thing and found nothing.

u mad?

Not really

112

Off Topic / My complaint against Bobah (Complaint Generator)

« on: July 16, 2011, 04:43:44 AM »

Unless you're a newly hatched pod person you already know that it is often said that Bobah exists in a state of intellectual hibernation. But let me add that Bobah prizes wealth and celebrity over and above decent morals and sound judgment. It is worth noting at the outset that if they could speak, the birds, snakes, and other creatures who are our Earth brothers and Earth sisters would surely say that Bobah's followers are too lazy to criticize the obvious incongruities presented by Bobah and his forces. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Bobah's expostulations are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Bobah doesn't want you to know the answer to that question; he wants to ensure you don't offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus.

When we tease apart the associations necessary to Bobah's irascible ideologies, we see that Bobah has been trying to convince us that the purpose of life is self-gratification. That argument fails to take into account the reality that Bobah maintains control over his vassals using intense peer pressure, manipulation of their guilt feelings, attacks on their loveuality, and fear. This is not what I think; this is what I know. I additionally know that Bobah is so dirty that he transcends the normal definition of that word into a whole new meaning that also encompasses "feckless" and "disgraceful". No, scratch that. Let me instead make the much stronger claim that those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still avouch that just because you can do something does not mean it's okay to do it, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Bobah is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them. We have an obligation to make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of his fairy tales. And we have an obligation to penetrate the sunny façade of his convictions with the sharpened stick of reality.

All kidding aside, I can undoubtedly suggest how Bobah ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Bobah himself. Okay, then, let's move onto the really good part of this letter, the part in which I get to tell you that he insists that elected national governments are not accountable to their own people. That lie is a transparent and strained effort to keep us from noticing that he's the secret player behind the present, libidinous political scene. Bobah must be brought out from behind the curtain before it's too late, before his trained seals terrorize our youngsters. Contrary to the Rousseauian ideal of the transparency of the general will to itself, he is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!

For Bobah's quasi-sanguinary plans to succeed, he needs to dumb down our society. An uninformed populace is easier to control and manipulate than an educated populace. Before you know it, schoolchildren will stop being required to learn the meanings of words like "pancreaticoduodenostomy" and "piezocrystallization". They will be incapable of comprehending that I can't make heads or tails of Bobah's dissertations. I mean, does he want to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance, or doesn't he? I guess what I really mean to say is that Bobah hates it when you say that his casus belli do not come without a price. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you.

Easy as it may seem to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse, it is far more difficult to mention a bit about sinful, mindless blusterers such as Bobah. As far back as I can remember, he has pitted scumbags against deadbeats and casuists against individuals. I do not find bromides that are neo-bloodthirsty, lascivious, and nefarious to be "funny". Maybe I lack a sense of humor, but maybe the most heinous cadgers you'll ever see have increasingly been creating new (and reinforcing existing) prejudices and misconceptions. Bobah has a lot to answer for in regard to that. Did you hear what he recently said about sectarianism? Never before has a disdainful muddleheaded-type so cleverly hidden in plain sight his intention to incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem.

We find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that the ideas of "freedom" and "academicism" are Siamese twins. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that we must reach out to people with the message that Bobah's failure to begin the debate about his remonstrations is so brown-nosing that Bobah labels everything that conflicts with his way of thinking as self-pitying, aberrant propaganda. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds that contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their unbridled biases. He argues that I am fatuous for wanting to reveal the nature and activity of his cohorts and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago.

With all due respect, Bobah has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers pesky or mealymouthed. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." He will accelerate our descent into the cesspool of Stalinism because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses arrogant New Age lunkheads with hotheaded and uncontrollable rage. Contrary to the impression that viperine buffoons offer "new," "innovative," and "advanced" ideas, there is little new in their hijinks.

If Bobah believes that violence and prejudice are funny, then it's obvious why he thinks that he's morally obligated to destroy our country from within. You know what? His barbs are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that Bobah's functionaries once used to dump effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers. Many people are worried that Bobah will let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of voluble, lousy euphuists in the immediate years ahead. I don't like to speculate on uncertain things, but I will say that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Bobah spends his leisure time devising ever more conscienceless ways to lower scholastic standards.

If we look beyond Bobah's delusions of grandeur, we see that I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but Bobah's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that he is extremely sniveling. In fact, my handy-dandy Sniveling-O-Meter confirms that this is a prescribed thought vs. free inquiry issue, an anti-democracy vs. democracy issue, and yes, a police state vs. free society issue. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Why is it that 99 times out of 100, the only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by infinity is to contemplate the extent of Bobah's stupidity? The most appealing theory has to do with the way that Bobah justifies his manipulative rooster-and-bull stories with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Bobah's claim that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight then he will lead me down a path of pain and suffering. For future reference, unless you define success using the sort of loosey-goosey standards by which Bobah abides you'll realize that true measures of success involve avoiding the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. Success is getting the world to see that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Bobah's pernicious endeavors. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and turn Bobah's whiney, sappy philippics to our advantage.

I've been rolling up my sleeves in preparation for a long, hard battle against blathering energumens. In that context, one could say that if Bobah wants to be taken seriously, he should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. To give the devil his due, I was impressed with how efficiently he managed to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness, especially given that I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness he is mongering. We need to shape a world of dignity and harmony, a world of justice, solidarity, liberty, and prosperity. Anyway, that's it for this letter. Let Bobah read it and weep.

tl;dr : http://www.pakin.org/complaint/ Use it complain about people fun.

113