Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Why would they do this knowing it would hurt votes for Annoying Orange?you're assuming a lot about the wit and sanity of someone who burned down a forgetin church
Exact opposite of what they want.
If it does she lied to the FBI.what lie has she told about these specific e-mails? anything prior to this is already dealt with, and if you mean she lied about there being confidential information, then why wouldn't it be a problem when they found confidential information before?
On top of that, she should already be in prison for tampering with evidence.
that isn't a black church, looks pretty beige to me, as long as its not 1955 there is no such thing as a black church, since when were we segregating our churches?de facto segregation is separate from de jure segregation, if people voluntarily/coincidentally split themselves by race there's nothing illegal about that, which is what happens with churches and schools that are still all/majorly full of only one race
Democrats always have to make race an issue when it isn't one.
Hillary is best friends with the grand dragon of the kool kids klub but the loving kool kids klub claims to support Annoying Orange? Yeah loving right lol.i had no idea "grand dragon" was actually a title in the kool kids klub and now i won't be able to think of the kool kids klub as anything other than an extremist DnD cult full of angry nerds
Too bad reddit is blocked on school wifi ripthere was a similar guy in my ap gov class, our teacher was kinda left-leaning and he would constantly try and debate with him about all sorts of stuff
Also my final class is a US Government class, and whenever anything republican or Annoying Orange related is metioned, she nearly always lets out the loudest and most obnoxious sigh
More along the lines of "Aaaauuuuuggghhh!..." and the teacher doesn't do stuff about it even though it annoys half the class lol
Lewds for Otto that everyone asked for yepholy stuffd
In the case of multiple routers, wouldn't you have to do some messing around with NAT and routing tables?i'm pretty sure it's just as simple as port forwarding to your second router from your main one, and then port forwarding from your second router to your computer
No it's this idea that "teh eble 2 prty systm" is the problem when in reality the problem is that everyone involved in your system isthe reason why winner-take-all elections tend toward a two-party system is because a two-party system is just the optimal state for simply getting people into office under this electoral system. because there's no reward until you get the most votes, naturally the best shot at representation is to have as few divisions in the electorate as possible, that way opposing parties have to get more votes to beat each other. there's no stupidity here--you literally have the best chance at representation when you settle for someone who's close enough to you, but more likely to actually win. strategic voting becomes a necessity in these systems because having more parties is objectively bad for everyone, it means that if you have sixteen parties, with full voter participation, someone could win with only 6.25% of the vote plus one. that is horrendously unrepresentative; 93.75% of the electorate wanted someone else.a friendhandicapped
Lolbertarian and green party are both stuff. They all suckyou suck nerd... owned??
If they're was confidential information coming through that server, it doesn't matter that it was an aide who sent it, because it was Clinton's private server, and as we already know, she did have confidential information on her server.sure, but i'm not sure how that would change their recommendation if there were already confidential information that they found before. also, again, we still don't know if these e-mails contain any confidential information.
