2896
Off Topic / Re: 2016 USA Presidential Race News & Discussion: Presidential Debate #3 on Wed.
« on: October 19, 2016, 09:58:42 PM »
neither of them are doing way more terribly than the other, but it's definitely a very divisive talk
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
That or political compass is loving handicapped. Rand Paul authoritarian? I wouldn't be suprised if they put Steffan Molynjew in the blueremember that political compasses are not relative to american politics, they're supposed to be independent of any particular nation's average ideology. because american politics, on average, rests in the blue area, we say that people are liberal/conservative/libertarian/etc. based on that average point (as well as slightly different interpretations of the terminology), not based on the international origin
free trade is good, yes, but why do you need 1000 pages on what free trade is? free trade agreements are regulations on trade. and the tpp not being transparent is something everyone should be skeptical of.probably to be crystal clear about what is and isn't allowed? i imagine that in legal terms, just saying "free trade!!!" is pretty ambiguous. there are definitely things to be unsure of tho
Anywhere that has a deal on Civ6? I don't wanna pay $60 but it seems like Firaxis has a lockdown on only $60 pricetags...i got some e-mails from greenmangaming about deals, duno how available they are still
Pretty sure it's GameMaker.duno if he's still using it, the fact that he already seems to have a menu and battle system leads me to believe he's usin something like rpg maker now
i got banned from the chat for 10 minutes for saying i was hyped for multiplayer modsForbidden magic
Honestly at this point nothing tristianluigi says should be taken seriouslywhy do people say things like this
Its a person's actions that make up their intentions, not their ideas.if you're implying that hillary is trying to be president because of some anti-american conspiracy and that literally none of her ideas are genuine i'd ask you to show me the body because that's a fairly extraordinary claim
And I don't think Annoying Orange will do what the Republicans in office want either. He seems to not be completely compliant with them either.regardless, he's a republican candidate and i already don't like his politics. i would naturally prefer the candidate whose personal viewpoints are more aligned with mine and who belongs to a party that i tend to align with more. Annoying Orange is neither of those things to me.
From my point of view Hillary is going to act like a republican, and Annoying Orange is going to act unlike either party, their previous actions prove that neither of them agree with their own party, but Hillary can and will shut everyone up. If you vote Hillary into office, you will be voting republican.clinton's ideas are definitely not republican.
Just because Annoying Orange is republican doesn't mean congress will go with whatever he says, Most Republicans are really against Annoying Oranges viewpoints and plans.
No, but when you have an entire storage building of loving evil deeds for One, and The Other has a brief case worth, and you still vote the first one into office, What loving assbackward north korean dictatorship bullstuff logic is that?like it or not, some people put policy first (and to most everyone it matters to at least some extent). i'm not going to vote for Annoying Orange because i disagree with most of his ideas, and more importantly, i don't want a republican congress to get away with whatever they want, and i don't want the supreme court or other federal courts to be filled by activist right-wing judges as Annoying Orange has promised.
You forgot the new zodiac signwhat the forget that would make me a capricorn i want to stay aquarius
http://www.newseveryday.com/articles/49272/20161014/nasa-new-zodiac-signs-dates-meanings-what-13th-ophiuchus.htm
with the introduction of the new one, I'd be a Virgo, but previously, a Libra
The Burden of proof is not on the who it was claimed, but the who made the claim.false means that you can prove it's wrong. if there simply isn't any/enough evidence one way or another, it's unproven.
Until the Claim is made proven its not only unproven but false.
(Innocent until proven guilty)