Messages

76

Off Topic / Re: Why is U.S.A. fighting in Afghanistan.

« on: June 20, 2011, 05:52:22 PM »

Holy loving stuff you people have no clue.

There has been war in Afghanistan as long as it has existed, because everyone wants to conquer it, for it is in a very tactical position. Every single Emporium in history with an army large/advanced enough to do the job has tried to do it. Some of the Afghans got tired of it some time ago and started defending themselves. Of course those afghans were very religious, because every single human on earth was very religious at that time.(Nowadays that group has evolved into Taliban, a group of Islam extremists and some awesome soldiers, that also calls itself the fighters of the holy war(/something similar)).

The last Emporium that wanted to conquer Afghanistan was the USSR, that was there for ten years before they finally decided that they could not win the Taliban forces. After the Soviets retreated, USA decided they could show how awesome they are by finishing the job. When the Americans had been in Afghanistan far longer than any other country, the Taliban decided to show them with whom they're loving with by throwing a couple of planes at American citizens. Until now the USA has still not managed to "win" the war because the Taliban is recruiting new members all the time.

Propably lots of spelling errors and I'm also only taking this from memory so some things are maybe wrong. Lol big rant.

Rant falls apart when you realize that we're not technically at war, we're not fighting a war of conquest, and that we're fighting with insurgents and guerrillas, not the Afghan military.

77

Off Topic / Re: America is a scary place.

« on: June 20, 2011, 11:53:27 AM »

AMERICAN capitalism. it's different everywhere

A lot of ideologies are different depending on where they come from, what's your point?

78

Off Topic / Re: Why is U.S.A. fighting in Afghanistan.

« on: June 20, 2011, 11:52:39 AM »

afghanistan isnt tatooine but it still has a stuffload of sand.

Not really, it's more dirt and rock than sand. Sand is more Saudi-Arabia and Egypt.

79

Off Topic / Re: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

« on: June 20, 2011, 11:51:41 AM »

Dad confronted me about weed, and I'm now being drug tested for the rest of the summer. loving god damnit

80

Off Topic / Re: You guys know these pictures of Stocking are fake, right?

« on: June 20, 2011, 01:13:05 AM »

I saw, but with this she can't make any excuses.

He couldn't make any excuses before either.

81

Off Topic / Re: Why is U.S.A. fighting in Afghanistan.

« on: June 20, 2011, 01:12:41 AM »

You morons. They picked 9/11 as a metaphor to the Emergency Number 9-1-1.

No, not really.

82

Off Topic / Re: You guys know these pictures of Stocking are fake, right?

« on: June 20, 2011, 12:15:25 AM »

We already know, I ran his photoshops through an image brown townyzer back in the original drama topic and debunked the whole thing.

83

Off Topic / Re: Why is U.S.A. fighting in Afghanistan.

« on: June 20, 2011, 12:14:36 AM »

but

of all days, why would they pick 9/11

Actually, it was entirely coincidental.

84

Off Topic / Re: America is a scary place.

« on: June 19, 2011, 05:01:48 PM »

They're also american, and money-hungry like every other business in america

That's sortof the point, it's called "Capitalism" you goon.

85

Off Topic / Re: All Powerful Monotheistic God vs Atheism

« on: June 19, 2011, 05:01:00 PM »

This reminds me of those times when you're at a circle and someone says something that is intended to be intelligent and difficult to conceptualize, but in reality is really easy and totally uninteresting.

"HEY GUYS LISTEN WHAT IF AN IMMOVABLE OBJECT GETS HIT BY A UNSTOPPABLE OBJECT"
"...And?"
"DUDES JUST THINK ABOUT THAT"

86

Off Topic / Re: Atheism Vs Deism

« on: June 19, 2011, 04:53:54 PM »

It's not a yes or no question. It can be defined as a illogical paradox that may seem logical in the grammar structure in the question but it really is not a logical question, and if God wanted to create the "illogical" object than I guess he would have to change the structure of this universe and the variables that surround it.

Stop spewing pseudo-intellectual bullstuff. Nothing of what you're saying is making any sense, and you're not making any sort of point. You're just piecing together words and concepts in an effort to look intelligent, and you're failing miserably.

By the way humans never defined the sides they just discovered it like everything else. So your saying you can have a crow that is complete black at the same time complete white? Good luck with that.

Yes, we "discovered" Geometry written on a stone monolith in the desert. That's how it happened. We just found those books that outlined basics of 2-dimensional geometric figures and their vertices. Of course.

You're not clever. This entire conversation has gone nowhere, I'm done.

87

Off Topic / Re: Why is U.S.A. fighting in Afghanistan.

« on: June 19, 2011, 04:46:23 PM »

Oil.

How loving stupid do you have to be to believe this? I mean, you really have to put no effort whatsoever into a thought process to produce this type of dumbstuff answer.

1. The government does not directly control the trade of Oil. Not sure if you know this, but the US is a Capitalist society. Companies like Mobil or BP decide where to put drilling rigs.
2. Most of the Oil located in the Middle East is not in Afghanistan, it's in Saudi Arabia - a country that we're not at war with and have decent economic ties to.
3. If we're after resources then we'd be fighting a war of conquest, which isn't happening. Our soldiers are specifically being deployed to put down insurrection and combat guerrilla fighters. We're actually working together with the Afghan military, not trying to take over the country - but that doesn't matter anyway because OUR government doesn't loving control where private corporations put their loving structures in foreign countries.

Just put some thought forward, just a little. Five seconds worth, minimum. Ask yourself "Is this a reasonable post? Is this idea entirely implausible? Am I mentally deficient?" before hitting "post".

88

Off Topic / Re: Atheism Vs Deism

« on: June 19, 2011, 04:40:20 PM »

You are not understanding what I am trying to put out, the question was can God make a 4 sided Triangle. No you cannot make a 4 sided triangle because a triangle is already defined in the world as a 3 sided shape.

3 sided shape = 3 sided shape

4 sided shape =/= 3 sided shape

Those are laws invented by HUMAN BEINGS. The Triangle did not exist before us so a triangle with 4 sides cannot exist, it is no longer a triangle because it does not follow the rules WE ESTABLISHED to define a figure as a triangle. What part of this are you not getting?

I am not talking about the name I am talking about the shape itself.

A common contention or question regarding God’s power and ability is that if God is omnipotent then can He create a stone He cannot move? A key point to make in answering this question is to highlight that ‘Omnipotence’ is misconstrued as ‘all powerful’. What omnipotence really implies is the ability to actualise every affair, rather than raw power. So God being able to “create a stone He cannot move” actually describes an affair that is impossible and meaningless, just like if we were to say “a white black crow” or “a circle triangle” or even an “amphibian mammal”.

Your example of a paradoxical geometric figure was stupid, but what's more stupid is the brown townogies you followed it with:
Amphibian Mammals do exist. It's called an Otter.
A White-Black Crow would be a Crow with both white and black colors on it.
A Circle-Triangle can't exist because they follow completely different rule sets for their creation, rules that we as human beings invented.

I understand what you're trying to convey; the idea that a god is so powerful that it can create objects with sets of laws that even it cannot break. It's an age-old question and there's no way to answer it realistically, but hypothetically the answer really can only either be "yes" or "no". It's not that complicated.

89

Off Topic / Re: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

« on: June 19, 2011, 04:34:04 PM »

http://www.erowid.org/plants/mushrooms/mushrooms_info12.shtml

90

Off Topic / Re: America is a scary place.

« on: June 19, 2011, 04:20:59 PM »

Italy :c

Britain and France, too.