Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - theblocker

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8
16
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 10, 2020, 10:39:30 AM »
Tbh I just like how calm and collected Darth Vader seems. Especially whenever something goes wrong. Compare that to Kylo Ren's childish temper tantrums and you'll be able to understand why I've always sympathised with Vader the most out of any character. That said, I've always leaned towards the Empire than any other faction. Mostly because they are incredibly disciplined, structured and efficient. Other factions have always seemed so chaotic and unstructured to me.

17
Off Topic / Re: hobby discussion thread
« on: July 09, 2020, 07:24:23 PM »
I've been cooking and reading literature relating to cooking a lot more recently. Mostly stuff like Apicius' de re Coquinaria. Aside from that, I've been working on 3D Printing a working RC Focke-Wulf Ta-152.

Other hobbies are Carpentry (Built my own desk from the ground up), Airsoft, Playing guitar/bass, Electronics (rPi/Arduino), Programming (68k assembly, C, C++, C#), Gamedesign and -development, Tinkering with my old Amiga 500 and hopefully soon I'll get around to building a forge and acquiring an anvil in the hopes of making some plate armor.

I really don't have enough time to do everything and it frequently annoys me.

18
Lol, I love our police. Yelling "POLITIE!!" into an empty shipping container.

19
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 09, 2020, 11:36:15 AM »
Controversial statement; Darth Vader is leagues above Kylo Ren

20
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 09, 2020, 08:23:19 AM »
why won’t you guys argue with me about whether or not you deserve to live :(
Strawman argument. I never said you don't deserve to live.

21
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 09, 2020, 08:15:13 AM »
You not posted anything to discuss, you've posted nothing but anecdotes.
If i were to post nothing but "Well I'm not religious *but* I know some catholic "friends" who say God is fake and research isn't good and the catholic church is a bunch of creeps and I met a creepy catholic once who was kind of a creep" you wouldn't want to argue that, would you?
I literally posted a study on research consumption and frequency of procrastination of heteroloveual vs homoloveual people to back up my views.

22
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 09, 2020, 07:06:58 AM »
And again they don't get farther than Ad Hominems. I was hoping to have actual, insightful discourse but looks like that's not going to happen. I'm done with this discussion lmao

23
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 08, 2020, 09:30:20 PM »
Is this surprising? People who are detached from traditional reproduction are intrinsically more loveually hedonistic, they have no other purpose for it. The idea that it caused homoloveuality is your anecdote.
You present an interesting point. I'll have a look at it when I wake up.

24
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 08, 2020, 09:15:34 PM »
Do you understand what anecdotal evidence is? You just admitted it's a weak form of evidence and then provided more
Of course I understand what anecdotal evidence is. That said, have a look at this paper; Traeen, Bente & Daneback, Kristian. (2013). The use of research and loveual behavior among Norwegian men and women of differing loveual orientation. loveologies. 22. e41–e48. 10.1016/j.loveol.2012.03.001. . It shows that homoloveual and biloveual men masturbate a lot more than heteroloveual men. Same goes for women but to a lesser degree.

25
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 08, 2020, 08:55:21 PM »
tbf anecdotal evidence + correlation doesn't equal causation makes this argument weak
Yeah, agreed. But take into consideration that I've looked at quite a few large gay communities to see if this was the dominant trend, and it very much appeared to be.

26
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 08, 2020, 08:38:06 PM »
Do you have any evidence for a correlation between the imbalance of some hormone and homoloveuality? (I'm not saying that this isn't the case, I'm simply asking because there's hundreds of theories as to why people are born gay)
I can recall reading a study on how hormonal balances in women and consequently their children can change depending on the amount of children the mother has had. The effect of this is that later children were more predisposed to same-love attraction. I can't find it looking right now, but if I come across it, I'll let you know.

On top of that: Do you have any evidence for the majority of homoloveuality to be related to overindulgence of loveual pleasures?
I know and have been around many gay people. The conclusion I drew comes from the common trend I've noticed among these people. Pretty much all of them were very frequent masturbators and big consumers of research.

27
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 08, 2020, 08:09:10 PM »
how does this explain people who have never had access to research or had love being gay though

do you simply deny their existence?
I never said they do not exist. The wording I used suggests room for exception. Born attraction to one's own love may be attributable to hormonal imbalances.

28
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 08, 2020, 07:53:50 PM »
i knew a guy who jacked off every single day of his life to the point where when he got lewinskys he had to have his richard loving bit in order to get any sort of enjoyment out of it. he's not even gay he's one of the straightest men i've ever met in my entire life
Different people process stimuli differently

29
Off Topic / Re: controversial statement s
« on: July 08, 2020, 07:47:32 PM »
you didn't answer my question
My point was that 'homoloveuality' is generally a result of loveual over-exposure and over-indulgence in the pleasure of loveual stimulation.

Let me put it this way. loveuality does not exist. All humans are born with a natural disposition to procreate, and humans are by default 'heteroloveual'. It is however possible to override this natural attraction to the opposite love and the drive to procreate by over-indulgance in loveual pleasure.

research plays a massive role in this. research functions much like a drug. In fact, I would argue it is a drug. The effect of research is that it requires a progressively higher amount of perversion to get off to. Much like how someone can get desensitized to drugs and needs a higher dose to get high.

Nobody is "gay", but rather they have in most cases over-consumed research and loveual pleasure, leading them into extreme perversion.

30
Oh and look they tacked on another bill making vandalism carry a 10 year sentence.
based

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8