121
Creativity / Re: Various paintings and such
« on: June 17, 2011, 04:09:12 AM »
Sorry about the delays, school etc.
Will be putting stuff up soon don't worry.
Will be putting stuff up soon don't worry.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
SO i was thanking of making a mod for Portal 2 that takes place in old aperture as it was in the old days. Where you could learn about its History but with a Awesome Story Line.Are you nine?
Good Ideal or not?
Also i am thanking of making that but too bad i don't have Portal 2(Friend let me barrow the game for PS3)
They only lost by a 9% vote. Next year they will get it :DThey lost by 4.5%.
It's already legal in a list of states. It's likely to become legalized completely in California next time it's up, the voter turnout was something upwards of 40% for legalization. Since then the pro-marijuana force has grown more, and it's a matter of years until it's legalized in Ca.46.5%
It doesn't matter, some people don't want Medical marijuana, and this abuse gives them more of an argument. If you really wanted Medical Marijuana, why don't you try doing something to support it proof-wise? It's a lot easier to stop, and Self Delete causes vary much more.Stealing from dispensaries. You're making it extremely obvious that you're trolling.
I believe they mean stealing it. I wouldn't be surprised. Especially since it has a bad enough reputation as it is, you'll have to try pretty hard to get people to accept it.
The straw man fallacy occurs in the following pattern of argument:
Person A has position X.
Person B disregards certain key points of X and instead presents the superficially similar position Y. Thus, Y is a resulting distorted version of X and can be set up in several ways, including:
- Presenting a misrepresentation of the opponent's position.
- Quoting an opponent's words out of context — i.e. choosing quotations that misrepresent the opponent's actual intentions (see contextomy and quote mining).
- Presenting someone who defends a position poorly as the defender, then refuting that person's arguments — thus giving the appearance that every upholder of that
- position (and thus the position itself) has been defeated.
- Inventing a fictitious persona with actions or beliefs which are then criticized, implying that the person represents a group of whom the speaker is critical.
Person B attacks position Y, concluding that X is false/incorrect/flawed.
- Oversimplifying an opponent's argument, then attacking this oversimplified version.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious, because attacking a distorted version of a position fails to constitute an attack on the actual position.
Okay, all in all, Medical Marijuana is highly unlikely to be accepted. It has a very wide history of other abuses, therefore making it difficult for some to accept. Unless something is done, it's simply not gonna happen.I HAVE NO ARGUMENTS LEFT SO I'M GOING TO SIMPLY REITERATE MY DISMISSAL OF EVERYTHING SAID CONTRARY TO ME AND THEN ASSUME I'M THE ONLY ONE RIGHT
But it's so true. One argument used against medical marijuana is that it might be abused. Is this false?One argument against people being allowed to have electricity is that they might commit Self Delete with it. Is this false?
I was just sayin' :vExcept cannabis has no negative consequences that are of any real substance IF you are responsible with it, and if you are irresponsible with cannabis, then you're probably irresponsible with quite a lot of things because you have to be actively trying to even become a burnout with cannabis. If you havn't noticed, over the years the propaganda has leaped to new defences and things to claim as time passes because the only things they can make claims about and still look legitimate via citing research (or abusing statistics) is by only citing the ones that researchers are still on the fence about, or citing ones that really lack any palpable research.
Your ALL BOLD CAPITAL TEXT puts your point across nicely, however. People tend to do drugs for that reason, and therefore tend to ignore the consequences. In other words: irresponsibility. Especially how some despise ethics, a basis of the human mind. In short, forgeted up.
And 'cool feelings' are the most advertized part of doing drugs, of course.forget it, I'm biting.
Except I'm talking about a psychological addiction, hurrrrrrrrrr.Ignore what he says, and say it's different, then say you're talking about what is exactly what he said.
And you're only proving my point.
Marijuana in it self isn't chemically or physiologically addictive, it's up to the individual whether or not they become addicted to it. It's just like Junk-Food, it tastes damn good, but if you over-do it, you'll have the consequences to pay.He's trolling. I don't see how you can't tell.
Also, stop playing the "I'm a perfect christian kid because I won't ever smoke pot, I'll never become addicted because I won't try it" routine, it gets old really fast. Are you even in High-school yet, or are you only backing your argument because your parents said Marijuana is bad.
Oh, my mistake then. :DFunny thing, did you ever know that opium comes from a plant?
I'm against 'chemical drugs' but I think the organic's should be legal and taxed, provided it doesn't end up like cigarettes.
Oh hey, another predictable response.Your whole dismissal as "LOL BIG BAD GOVERNMENT" towards any legitimate response just makes it that much more obvious that you're a troll.
You have discovered the fastest route to the friendzone.^^^