91
Creativity / Re: Various paintings and such
« on: July 02, 2011, 12:07:04 AM »
Which?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
92
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:36:11 PM »You seem a bit upset bro.
You can get overclocks of around 5GHz with liquid cooling if you try with any processor.
"OH NOES YOU GOT A LAMBORGHINI INSTEAD OF A FERARI YOU MUST BE POOR"
Also the fact that you can kick that AMD processor up to 4.3 ghz easily on air cooling should stand for itself.
Also enjoy kicking away 70% of your processors lifetime by bringing it up that high.
93
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:31:15 PM »Ok? Then if you're actually able to afford it then go ahead and buy Intel. If you're poor and would like to have some bragging right in owning a modest hexcore than go for AMD.
$40 dollar difference makes you poor. okay, mister douchebag.
94
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:24:10 PM »http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=203I hope you realize the price gap between those two. It's enough for them to be in seperate brackets.
This isn't even a Core i7, it's a Core i5 of Intel's latest Sandy Bridge CPU lineup, versus AMD's top processor, a Phenom II X6. Intel still wins.
ADDENDUM: Not to mention the fact that AMD is more OC friendly, which means you could get even more power out of it.
95
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:14:50 PM »
Citation? I'd like to see a website that isn't passmark that says so.
96
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:10:16 PM »Any GPU can heat like a bitch. They just make the chip, they don't tell manufacturer's specifically to put whatever type of fan on their cards. It all depends on airflow.So why is it biased? Because there are simply more Intel cpus on the list?The website is biased because it's including the extremely high end processors, which Intel makes, and AMD doesn't. Unless you plan on owning your own supercomputer, this means nothing, because I'm talking about consumer level CPUs.
That's like saying an automotive review critic is biased because he reviews more Toyota cars than Maseratis.
Also if you can't get why including one group more than the other is statistically biased, I have little hope for you.
97
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:05:33 PM »Should I start repeating "cherry picked answers" too, then?I'm not citing any website with heavily biased answers so it'd just make you look like an idiot, but go for it.
98
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 11:01:24 PM »There are at least 2-3 consumer level Intel CPUs above AMD's highest top of the line processor.1. Cherry picked answers.
You're stupid and you're making yourself look even worse.
2. You're resorting to attacking my own intelligence. Running out of arguments?
99
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:59:00 PM »so sheezy's trolling right?Cherry picked answers. There are WAY more Intel CPUs tested on that than AMD CPUs.
on that chart, the core i7 2600k scored almost 12,000. it's like $315. the highest scoring AMD processor, the Phenom II X6 1100T, scored around 6,000. It's like $220 or something.
hurr durr.
100
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:54:24 PM »http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.htmlBusiness trouble as in business related.
Intel quad cores are better than AMD hexcores. What does that tell you? By this logic, 4 is better than 6 because apparently Intel made their quadcores better than AMD's hexcores.
BTW, you kept saying that Intel had business trouble. Er go, I gave evidence that they're clearly not having trouble with business. Then you went on and jumped to performances, which Intel still leads.
Business =/= financial
Also, those are all super-high-end CPUs for the most part, costing over $1000, and they don't have the matching AMD super-high-end AMD CPUs. Look at the number of Intel CPUs tested vs AMD CPUs tested. Your answers are cherrypicked.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103913
AMD: 3.7 ghz
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115079
Intel: 3.46 ghz
INTEL IS DEFINITELY BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!
101
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:45:45 PM »
Leading in market share =/= leading in performance you dipstuff.
With your logic, Toyota must be better than Maserati.
With your logic, Toyota must be better than Maserati.
102
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:41:52 PM »No, not at all. AMD gets you more power per dollar, but Intel can get you more power overall.This has been the case, however, the contracts they had with hardware and software designers had expired, and the designers wanted contracts that cost more money, which was more than Intel was willing to give. As a result, development has kind of frozen.
103
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:38:18 PM »
Seriously, compare the technical specs of newer Intel stuff vs the technical specs of newer AMD stuff. AMD is leading.
104
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:30:14 PM »Also pay no attention to this.I'm not. Intel had been known for making some REALLY loving high end stuff, they're just falling behind due to business problems at the moment.
I don't know why people like to slam on Intel or Nvidia, they make some of the highest quality parts out there. If it doesn't work they promptly replace it. My brother rubbed his finger all over his Core i7 920 like a handicap and they still replaced it for free.
I suggest an Intel mobo. I prefer Intel and Nvidia over AMD/AMD. Mix-matching them isn't pretty either (Intel + AMD graphics or AMD + Nvidia graphics).
105
Off Topic / Re: Obligatory computer parts topic.
« on: July 01, 2011, 10:24:55 PM »
I really don't recommend that you go with anything owned by Intel. They've been having problems with chipset designers and thus are falling behind. If you need proof, look at the highest end AMD stuff vs the highest end Intel stuff.
The antec P193 is a pretty solid case. For fans theres no real deciding factor aside from the fact that high CFM of airflow is good, and you might want lower dba in regards to sound.
The antec P193 is a pretty solid case. For fans theres no real deciding factor aside from the fact that high CFM of airflow is good, and you might want lower dba in regards to sound.