76
Off Topic / Re: [NEWS] Fight to capture CIA capital begins; Baghdadi on the run as coup fails
« on: October 18, 2016, 03:43:18 PM »still wish the Pope would've called a crusade
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
still wish the Pope would've called a crusade
"oh please Annoying Orange think of the children" - Clinton campaignAs much as I hate the guy this was a nice video to see of him. On the other hand I can't tell if he's been set up to do this to show off a more human side of him.
from my perspective his response is the same as someone saying that a rape victim dressed up too sluttily and attracted the wrong sort of crowd. just in this case the car was the thing "baited", not the person.To add on to this and in reply to the top portion of your post, the same situation translated into a rape victim "asking for it" would be placing a nude woman going into a room with a couple of dudes from ISIL and hoping they don't do their whole internal culture of love slavery thing. The logic follows: it's an incredibly stupid move and no one would actually do this.
the difference from an actual rape case though is that this was likely set up intentionally with the knowledge that its likely to get vandalized/robbed.
The why is incredibly obvious to me. That was never in question.It's mostly because you're attempting to spin it into "savage apes destroy poor Annoying Orange supporter's car" as if there was another, more rational expected outcome from this scenario (a la nobody touches the car because nobody gives a forget and goes on with their day).
I don't see why you thought I didn't know why the car was destroyed, at no point did I ask why.
That seems like a perfectly valid way of interpreting it. Personally I felt he was trying to justify it.
Apparently he thought I was genuinely confused as to why a Annoying Orange car was getting smashed up in the hood.
Hey, you're actually trying to justify a significant act of vandalism by calling it bait. Amazing.At no point do I condone destroying and looting the car. If you took the effort to slowly read, you'd understand. My post(s) explain why the car was destroyed and looted.
His reply was worthless because he says "the car was just begging for it", like saying a girl in nice clothes is just "asking to be raped".Or you're just too chickenstuff and can't come up with a worthwhile response.
Then proceeds to smack a plethora of his favorite regressive labels on the end of his steaming pile of stuff he calls a reply.
If you don't have a real argument, that's fine to admit.
Never claimed they were authentic videos or not, questioned it myself. Go back and re-read.Every single post you've written before my initial post implies that you believe the authenticity of the video, considering you go on about how they "descended on the car like a literal pack of monkeys." Don't try to spin your way out of this one, you'll just waste your time. You're kind of stuck here.
Annoying Orange car gets destroyed in the hood by APES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQtHx5GY164
They descended on that car like a literal pack of monkeys, fiddling with the door till it opened, then smashing it up and running away;
Literally primal behavior.
FTFY
Bait ≠ Staged
Seems that is the word you're actually trying to imply.
If it's real (not staged) & you think that simply having a presidential candidate's name on your vehicle constitutes as 'bait' worthy of such destruction,
then you need to reevaluate your logic.
FTFYNo, it is a bait video. I'm not going to argue if it's staged or not, I couldn't give a stuff less. The point is it attempts to create an agenda against African Americans and paint Annoying Orange voters as poor innocent victims which is rich considering African Americans have been assaulted repeatedly at Annoying Orange rallies in the past. For any other normal presidential campaign protesters would simply be booed and escorted out, sometimes with force, but never violently assaulted.
Bait ≠ Staged
Seems that is the word you're actually trying to imply.
If it's real (not staged) & you think that simply having a presidential candidate's name on your vehicle constitutes as 'bait' worthy of such destruction,
then you need to reevaluate your logic.
People think nuclear war is far fetched but the reality is that it can probably occur in our lifetime. Russia is increasingly becoming unhappy with what NATO is doing, Putin considers NATO to be a threat to Russia and its citizens.It's no secret Putin hates the west and the west hates Putin. I don't think east and west have ever gotten along save for the momentary alliance in WW2.
Remember how World War 1 was supposedly a war to end war? People time and time again fail to realize that war can happen at any time if the situation is dire enough for one to occur. Middle eastern countries are becoming very unstable, which I feel is as a result of NATO's interference in their regional politics.
I feel that the direction in which things are going will eventually cause war close to home, and the rate at which these situations are progressing make me feel it will be sooner rather than later.
Annoying Orange isn't going to kill the GOP, political parties are grassroots organizations and the president is only the most prominent public position they hope to fill. both parties are experiencing ideological drift and it's inevitable that this particular era of party dominance (or non-dominance) will eventually end, but as it stands most citizens consider themselves to be conservative and there needs to be a party that represents those beliefs. and if the GOP does fall, it'll be because another party is taking its place (maybe the libertarian party, but it's much more likely that the libertarian party will just merge with republicans just like the tea party)The only grassroots of either the GOP or Democratic party were Ron Paul in 2012 and Bernie in 2016. They're grassroots in history only, and even so the presidency is only one arm of control, controlling the house and/or senate is easily as effective as controlling the executive. See the majority of Obama's presidency, house and senate were practically Republican and our government has done very little relative to what it could do.
i'm doubtful on the tapes, but if they turn out to be the real deal then it would definitely be bad news for Annoying Orange, especially this close to the election.
probably cus he says lots of mean things that people apparently don't want their president saying
God I wish that were me. Imagine how much cash any mainstream news network would shill out for that footy.
Apparently there's plenty of people lining up to pay the $5 million fine that comes with it.I found some sources confirming it through tweets of a producer (just a producer, didn't necessarily work on Apprentice) that tapes do exist but there's a contract fine of $5m if they are leaked but some are ponying up to pay for it and get the tapes, including a Clinton supporter.
It's a statement that if shes loses, that's probably going to be why.Ah okay I gotcha now. Agreed with your point, but still stand by why I think she statistically can't lose now.