Messages

31

AoT General / Re: This is how pros play age of time.

« on: June 21, 2011, 10:33:27 AM »

32

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 19, 2011, 02:00:01 AM »

Pink rhinos only dance on friday.

33

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 18, 2011, 10:20:35 AM »

You can understand me. That's all that matters.

34

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 17, 2011, 09:44:35 PM »

And you call me childish.

Actually I never said that. I compared certain attributes that you possess, namely your logical reasoning, to that of a child. I didn't mention anything about your behavior or maturity in regards to childishness.

But I wouldn't really expect someone with the logical reasoning of a child to figure that out, so no harm done.

I like these little exchanges we have. Despite calling me a child for not "letting it drop," you continue to reply to me out of pure stubbornness. All I had to do was log into my photobucket and pick the silliest picture, and you still replied. Not only do you always reply to me, you never cease to leave little bits of logical fallacy, hypocrisy, and general stupidity in your messages.

35

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 17, 2011, 09:34:26 AM »

What a load of nonsense! And I believe you're the child here, not for your "logical reasonings", but the fact that you won't let it drop. Stop replying. I don't care about you.

36

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 15, 2011, 08:54:01 AM »

Yet you still reply. Therefore I must be worth it. You contradict yourself.

And yet I never said you weren't worth replying to, in fact I specifically replied because it was you who said that, and I wanted to clarify that I think your posts need some improvement.

I'm about 100% certain you don't even read what I say, you just try and think up some good comeback. And if that isn't true then you must have the logical reasoning skills of a small child. You just spew random nonsense out as if you were an elaborate troll, but I know you aren't that clever. You just couldn't reason your way out of a wet paper bag.

37

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 14, 2011, 01:01:21 PM »

You're implying I'm not worth replying to.

I'm implying your posts aren't worth replying to.

Because of the petty way you always try to argue. You rarely mention anything I'm talking about and instead try to insult me. You don't even come up with new insults, you just rehash your delusions.

When I insult you, I at least take the time to pinpoint why I am insulting you and I actually use rationale instead of saying "you're just mad because *random unrelated statement*"

38

Off Topic / Re: Paranoid Parents Meme

« on: June 12, 2011, 07:09:25 PM »

HAHA parents r dum lol

39

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 12, 2011, 07:03:31 PM »

The irony is you just replied anyway. Therefore I WAS worth the effort.

I thought about replying too this but then I was like "oh wait, it's hellboy LOL"

40

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: June 08, 2011, 03:18:28 PM »

You're just angry because Jetz outsmarted you yet again. And don't think I'm trying to be an arrogant douchebag, because I know all of Koleth's little secrets and what he said about you. And don't pretend you don't care about that too.

I thought about replying too this but then I was like "oh wait, it's hellboy LOL"

41

Off Topic / Re: The word "yes" pisses me off

« on: June 01, 2011, 06:06:32 AM »

It's distinctive, which linguistically is what you want for such an important word.

It would be very hard to hear "yes" instead of "no" because of how phonetically different they are, and yet they are such small words.

Take Spanish for example, the word "sí" with its accent means "yes", but without the accent it means "if". Think about the kind of trouble that could cause.

42

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: May 28, 2011, 10:26:50 PM »

But that isn't programming code. Also, I wouldn't call it genetic coding, more genetic instructions.

Well I'm glad you have a preference for what it should be called, but I'm pretty sure every genealogist that studies genetic code doesn't care what you think and will continue to refer to it by its already existing name.

Are you really such an arrogant douchebag that you had to try and correct me on something purely based on what sounds better to you? You can't just change the title of something. "I wouldn't call it a boat, it's more like a water car."

"Pardon me, but I wouldn't call that a dog, I think you meant a woof-woof"

43

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: May 25, 2011, 03:21:23 PM »

However, that factory was built with the power of architecture, which is easily closer to modeling than coding. The point is, tshadest is a dumbass.

Yes, but the architect who designed the model has DNA consisting of genetic code.

44

AoT General / Re: Male Models = 0?

« on: May 24, 2011, 06:53:41 PM »

Yeah, but the physical design for the computer it was coded on was modeled.

Yeah, but the factory that made modeled the casing for the computer used computers with code.

45

Games / Re: Would Livestreaming an emulated Gameboy Advance game be illegal?

« on: May 07, 2011, 07:42:52 PM »

Well now that we've answered the second post in this thread maybe we should focus our attention back to the OP's question.

If by "aside from emulating" you are asking if you actually had a legal copy of the game and were livestreaming it, no, that would not be illegal*.

But thats a stupid question because emulating games is illegal and only starfishs do it and your posting on the GAMES section of a forum for a GAME about STEALING GAMES. See how one might run into trouble?

*NOTE: I'm only trained in bird law