Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mod-man

Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 ... 319
976
Yeah but what's the harm/loss? Lordician just owned him in that post, and NickPB can't even respond, nor can he kek or chuckle about it, since he's ban on sight.
why do you think being ban on sight bars you from the forums completely?

honestly there probably is no harm here. it just proves to me though that im right about people actually having the inability to ignore others here. like when i realize someone's a troll and that im giving them the ooey gooey attention they want, i just delete my post and move on.

i mean congrats on the silent victory and all, but he'll never see it so it does no good, and if he does see it he'll kek all the way to the moon and back cause yall are still twisted about it

977
Gallery / Re: Post your Ride V2
« on: February 22, 2017, 11:34:56 AM »


you know what's up

978
And from what i see from his post history he is a (semi-)troll, so here, get fed.
Hope that fuels your need for attention for some time. :)
so

you take the bait, you acknowledge you took the bait, THEN you post??

the blf proves it's lack of self control yet again

979
If I enter a setting of powerful people--let's say a random survey of people making more than 500k/year--the vast majority of them would know what WSJ is. Maybe a small percentage would know about PewDiePie.
ok but why are you entering a setting of powerful people? no stuff most of them know what WSJ is. if you're picking from random people making that kind of salary with powerful influence, of course none of them will know pewdiepie exists. i imagine somebody of that stature wouldn't even know what most of youtube was. they're a small section of the overall majority. theres way more average people than this random survey of a specific minority you're proposing suggests

this blatant display of distrust is beyond most absurdities mainstream media likes to cause. to the general public, its clear this article meant nothing more than to cause harm, and all it did was backfire onto themselves. WSJ numbers are at an all time low, while all this article did was give pewdiepie more subscribers and more views. did you look at anything these videos went over? did you watch any of these videos at all?

980
because some teenagers on Youtube are like ants to corporate media giants.
would you consider pewdiepie an ant compared to media giants like WSJ?

981
Off Topic / Re: #PewDiePieDidNothingWrong
« on: February 19, 2017, 11:24:46 AM »
isn't there like 7 companies spanning all media and disney's one of them
6 companies: GE, News corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS

together they probably pull in at least 100 billion dollars a year. i estimate that because their 2010 turnout apparently totaled out to almost 300 billion dollars

982
Off Topic / Re: "the dawn is your enemy" adult swim bump?
« on: February 18, 2017, 09:02:26 PM »
i feel like i remember reading somewhere that during the era of these bumps they'd design them and air them early in the morning (like 6am since this pitch was one of the end ones that transitioned into cartoon network) to make kids feel uncomfortable about watching AS

could be totally wrong tho lol

983
Off Topic / Re: #PewDiePieDidNothingWrong
« on: February 18, 2017, 02:33:06 PM »
heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler heil Riddler

that sounds bad out of context, doesnt it
sounds kind of memey. what are trying to accomplish with this post? do you even know?

985
Off Topic / Re: #PewDiePieDidNothingWrong
« on: February 17, 2017, 12:09:08 PM »
I don't think you can sue for libel if the thing reported was true
technically i think he could sue for defamation. the articles are tying to make it out like pewdiepie actively believes and supports hate speech, but he's explicitly said he doesn't. that falsifies and slanders his reputation

986
Off Topic / Re: Itt: We are Tumblr
« on: February 17, 2017, 08:02:24 AM »
I HIDE BEHIND A MASK OF INTERNET PERSONALITY TO REPRESS THE FACT I LIVE WITH MORE MENTAL ISSUES THAN THE IMAGINARY PSYCHOLOGIST IN MY HEAD CAN COUNT. THE FALSE SENSE OF COMMUNITY AND ACCEPTANCE ON TOP OF MY 4TH DEGREE SOCIAL ANXIETY BARS ME FROM GETTING REAL HELP. I CAN'T EVEN

987
Off Topic / Re: #PewDiePieDidNothingWrong
« on: February 17, 2017, 06:59:23 AM »
and people have the choice to get offended by anything. the only difference is that making a joke about a genocide is a douche move, while getting offended over a genocide joke is not. unfortunately, several people in this thread think it should be the opposite, that people who react towards insensitive and forgeted up jokes are the devil incarnate, and all profanity and disrespect should be the law of the land

i get what you mean about the 'construct' and 'context' part of your post, but in this case, taking advantage of people who probably dont speak proper english in a developing country to say an extremely insensitive phrase isn't a well constructed joke.
you're right, anyone has the right to be offended, but your offensivness should never reach a level where youre trying to discredit and slander someones reputation and business just because you don't agree with their humor. if they're genuinely hateful people than id understand, but that is not the case here

do you understand what I mean by construct? cause you can tell a genocide joke and not be a richard. i mean, am i classified as a richard just because I enjoy and partake in offensive humor? does that quality of me immediately invalidate all the good things I do on a daily basis? while the subject matter of the joke is key to how you construct it, it's not part of the construction

the construct of the joke is your assessment of the current social situation and how you deliver that joke in said social situation. purely the mechanics of the joke, not the content. if i just walked up to a group of people at a party and said "death to all jews haha" that's not really that funny and a lot of people would find it offensive or uncomfortable. a poorly constructed joke. now if i were to deliver that same joke with a witty story and a witty punchline that's based within the bounds of the social situation at hand, then you can make a funny jokes about genocide. Can the people I told that joke to get offended? Of course. but once they start fighting me and bullying me for it, their getting their stuff kicked in. not because I'm a richard, but because humor is not meant to be taken seriously. it's a joke. if you don't like it, simply make it known in a respectable manner

taking things out of context to prove a point about something as serious as anti-semitism isn't respectable by any means, and that way of promoting information only breeds ignorance, especially when it's done by an entity like the Wall Street Journal. they're doing more damage to the overall picture than the humor is

988
Off Topic / Re: #PewDiePieDidNothingWrong
« on: February 16, 2017, 11:08:48 PM »
i mean we dont make jokes about that, do we?
we can make jokes about anything, it's just a matter of how you construct it

989
Off Topic / Re: #PewDiePieDidNothingWrong
« on: February 16, 2017, 07:20:51 PM »
PewDiePie made a video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lwk1DogcPmU
forget yeah pewdiepie. that was a pretty awesome video i thoroughly enjoyed it

990
Off Topic / Re: Who's the nicest Blocklander you've ever met?
« on: February 16, 2017, 02:36:42 PM »
toby

Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 71 ... 319