Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Arekan

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 225
16
Off Topic / Re: Bill Gates is no longer the world's richest person
« on: October 28, 2017, 02:22:23 PM »
I like how fast everyone jumps on him, even to bring up old ass memes.
dogforgeter-math.gif
Great meme.

He's right, you know. Technically, if this trend continues, he will be the first trillionaire. He never said he'd do it this instant. He's just most likely at this point.

17
General Discussion / Re: older blockland user check-in.
« on: October 23, 2017, 03:19:23 PM »
I want to be on the list. :(

18
I thought everyone knew this. It's why there's a lot of things that companies wont let you in on until you're 18, they don't want to deal with that stuff.

19
Games / Re: cod ww2 beta is live on steam
« on: September 30, 2017, 12:41:34 AM »
In my experience, it's the complete opposite.
I get 100+ frames, the gameplay and map design is very simplistic (like old CoDs), there's literally zero reason to give a forget about what the person you're shooting identifies as, and the netcode isnt any different from games like Battlefield.

I hate to defend this, but it seems like 90% of the people who've decided to jump on the bandwagon time and time again haven't even tried it. They're going back to the old formulas (the ones people liked) and people are still pissy. I had fun playing it.

20
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread v2 - Furry Things Here!
« on: September 12, 2017, 03:36:06 PM »
artist unknown's battlegrounds

21
Games / Re: When did you have to pay to play mutliplayer on PS4?
« on: September 09, 2017, 08:57:23 PM »
Wasn't free online gaming one of the props of Playstation that people kept boasting about during the console wars?

22
Off Topic / Re: Possible HL3 Story Exposed (Bring your salt)
« on: August 25, 2017, 04:13:35 PM »
He's covering his ass.
He was supposedly manning a Twitter account named 'BreenGrub' back in 2012, so this obviously isn't something he just came up in the past year. This is a plotline that's been there for years and VALVe never made a game from it.

23
Games / Re: Does anybody play Escape from Tarkov?
« on: August 17, 2017, 12:26:56 AM »
[size= 1pt]I have a problem lol[/size]
Trying a couple grand m8

This game looked 'meh' at best. It looks like one of those 'too good to be true' things. I really hope that later down development, some odd 'catch' like p2w things don't suddenly appear.

24
Games / Re: ROBLOX Thread ⱽ³⋅⁶ - Powering Cheez-Its
« on: August 01, 2017, 04:23:19 PM »
dude you cant he used to be a low level pro at cs go
Well, technically, high level, just not professional.
Professionals are a whooooole different league, but as far as regular CSGO goes, I was in the top two ranks and in the like.. top 10% I think.

how do i get better at phantom forces i want to loving pwn arekan at his own game
I will activate my built-in aimbot every time I'm playing against you so you can NEVER pwn me

25
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread v2 - Furry Things Here(?)
« on: July 27, 2017, 01:02:02 PM »
Got this a while ago of my own character.

26
Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread v2 - Furry Things Here(?)
« on: July 17, 2017, 07:02:41 AM »
MFF had its chlorine thing, but other than that, I've never seen any problems in the eight cons I've went to.
You hear of a person here and there being brought to the hospital for alcohol poisoning or heat stroke, but that's it.

The thing with what happened to Rainfurrest is that there are some facts that seem really odd and out of place (such as the video's claim of "the same person writing letters to hotels telling them not to allow the convention was the same person putting diapers on cars") which lead me to people that the people doing this vandalism were people hating furries and wanting them out, and not actual con-goers.
The thing about (most) furries is that their degenerate special interestes USUALLY stay online, they never actually engage in them in real life, and would never even wish to, besides the suiting thing.
... So I find stuff like that extremely hard to believe. I'm 100% sure it was some cool boys doing some epic pranks because they hate those damn furries. Happened before with the chlorine.

27
Køtt is also useless to debate with
You were sidetracking the conversation when you could've just as easily taken it to DMs because it was targeted specifically at Verification.

28
it's literally the website hiring an ad server to display banners. the website doesn't have much say in what ads are displayed unless they are willing to dish out extra money for targeting
Well.. that's.. exactly the point. Mediafire didn't dish out that extra money, so people are moving on to websites that DID dish out that extra money. It's their own fault. They can be blamed for it. It was their decision.

29
and you're stuff-flinging about what exactly? because you're upset? forget did i do to you?
Where are these insults coming from? I'm commenting about how you're trying to join in on this debate but all I see in your posts are repeated mentions of Blockland not being associated with ads on the forums or something completely irrelevant after the point was established. Where did this notion that I'm upset at you even come from?

as opposed to you dodging what i said so you can push your narrative on why mediafire is intentionally evil and a bad service and why we as consumers should not make our own decision on what service we use
What I said is that Mediafire is doing what its doing now because it isn't gaining attention. It's not gaining attention because it's resorting to being a stuff service and using shifty ad services without monitoring what ads they receive. Other services can hold their own perfectly well without doing what Mediafire is doing, while you claim "MEDIAFIRE HAS TO!" Clearly, Mediafire would not have to resort to these things, if it just paid a little extra attention to itself. Now, all their traffic has moved on. They have to punish the current dedicated userbase that still host their files on the website by shoving obtrusive ads and using adblock-detecting scripts.

30
this is probably the most black and white statement presented in this thread, and it pretty much summarizes why arguing about it is pointless since you clearly don't understand the reason how website traffic is determined.

mediafire is using ads because they don't get attention, and that's how it's able to stay in business. it has nothing to do with their 'selection' of ads, which, mind you, is nonexistent since they don't choose what ads get displayed. if you and other people want to use a flashier, better file uploading service, nobody's stopping you or condemning you. but you condemning people for using mediafire and condemning mediafire for trying to earn money just shows how little of the big picture you actually see
You use the term 'black and white' more than your apparent obsession with black rappers. It's weird.
You also completely dodged what I said so you can push your own stuffty narrative.
Useless to try to debate with you.

Køtt is also useless to debate with because he keeps going back to "BLOCKLAND and ADS"

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 225