Messages

2836

Creativity / Re: Mega Bear's LOVE2D Games - Bit Builder, Zen Garden

« on: January 03, 2012, 06:45:26 AM »

I'm willing to be a sprite artist for any of your games, I assumed you were able to change the textures in Bit Builder, but since you can't, I'll make a mockup of some texture ideas.

2837

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 03, 2012, 06:17:44 AM »

You're just mad that you got a boner looking at those loli pics and now you gotta prove that you aren't a child enthusiast.

Stocking's trying to troll by stuffting out of her mouth again.

2838

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 03, 2012, 06:15:51 AM »

I've got an ass of keys, I wouldn't have to pay for a new one.

Your tax dollars at work!

2839

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 03, 2012, 06:04:28 AM »

And after they buy a new key, they will sure to mess up and get banned again then rinse and repeat.

Not really, most of them go scott-free since of this law the moderators love so much.
You may only ban people if they confess to doing something that could have gotten them banned.
This seems to be the case in most bans.

2840

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 03, 2012, 05:42:36 AM »

loopyla > spreadsplague

It makes me wonder why Badspot nowadays simply lets people make new accounts after getting permabanned.
If he banned anybody trying to come back, the forum would have been a better place.

2841

General Discussion / Re: Blockcon

« on: January 03, 2012, 05:37:11 AM »

99% of the community refuse to play the game, this will not work.

2842

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 10:22:58 PM »

It could also fall under gross, trolling, child softcore research, etc.

And it's so loving obvious, why haven't any of our moderators done ANYTHING about it?
Hell, if we still have any online.

I have been banned tho, I was in that mass-ban alongside everyone else in that thread.

And I was implying that you weren't ever banned for your own actions, not even pretending to be asian,starting shistorms, trolling, posting adult content, asking for pity, starting flame wars or posting cartoon child research.

Now, i'm out of the thread, you'd probably try and make a tribal remark or let SpreadsPlauge throw a comment dats typed in gramer like dis at me.

2843

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 10:09:27 PM »

Your trolling is so painfully obvious, it's a saddening miracle it hasn't gotten you banned.

2844

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 10:06:24 PM »

You won't get arrested for almost-naked cartoon girls in any first-world-country, no matter how inbred their queen is.

I don't see what is it with you and a monarch who rarely does anything anymore.
And it can be research even when it's not naked, as long as it's made as fap material and is really, really suggestive.

2845

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 09:57:47 PM »

Ok, and...

That should be bannable in itself, it's a step further from her usual trolling.

They weren't completely nude, but they still count as adult content, they were suggestive, they had cameltoes visible in them, hell, they also derive from hentai/research websites (Reverse google image search), but you reuploaded them to imgr to be on the safe side.

Not to mention it was MADE as fap material for sick forgets.

2846

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 09:47:07 PM »

itt: brutally buttmad brit tries to push his imperialist agenda

All i was talking about how Stocking could get actual people in legal trouble, not the country itself.

They aren't nude though.

And what kind of sick, twisted country would outlaw lolicon?

The UKraine

It's far too obvious that you're trolling here.
I remember someone called Vertzer on the forum sometime in late 2007, he was openly discussing child research and got banned in a huge drama.
And you? you actually posted the sick material, which is even worse,  i don't know why moderation here has degraded so loving much.

2847

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 09:40:22 PM »

Lolicon is legal in the United States. George Bush tried to push for a ban on it, but it was overturned on the grounds that it violates freedom of expression.

Legally, lolicon is art to be admired.

Whoopee-loving doo, and I'm living in a country that had an anti-cartooon child research law passed recently.
Get banned.

2848

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 09:36:38 PM »

It's okay if it's really hot.

You know just having even simply cache of those images on your computer in some countries can get you arrested if found, right?
I had to loving wipe my internet cache after seeing that post.

2849

Drama / Re: Stocking - No explanation needed.

« on: January 02, 2012, 09:32:20 PM »

It was sick how she posted softcore drawn child research on the forum, she's obviously playing with fire and she needs to be set ablaze.

2850

Drama / Re: A few bronies have been bad about keeping pony related stuff in their thread.

« on: January 02, 2012, 09:30:52 PM »

And of course Tony forgot to read anything I've posted. Like I've said millions of times before, I'm a 1k player but the ID on my profile is wrong, if you check RTB you'd see it's true.

Riiiiight.
We can believe you.


You're either an alt or just someone really trying to fit in.