can anyone explain to me why it's okay to post completely bare boobs as long as the nipples aren't showing
I mean, even if there's still a slight bulge where the nipple would be, that is apparently fine
as long as it's not pink...
Because the rules of this forum are broken, that's why.
People have posted what was basically child research in the past and got away with it.
no, that would be similar to showing a bare chest without boobs
So what would it be for males then?
a snake without a visible head
That's a rather important part of a snake, I'd say, and it'd look a little too weird if that were gone. On the other hand, a boob without a nipple is still pretty clearly a boob.
Then again, it's not really the tip of the snake itself that makes it "incriminating" by today's standards, but I suppose that in itself is the problem here.
I can't believe that I'm loving reading this, lol.
Furries sperging about snakees.
brother dose prices are cray
Furries have paid up to thousands of dollars for art in the past, so don't be suprised.
It's just how milking them works.