4606
Games / Re: Fallout Series - Megathread
« on: March 24, 2012, 08:23:22 PM »loving Christ, can you read?Fallout 3 is a FPSRPG
AKA: First Person Shooter Role Playing Game
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
loving Christ, can you read?Fallout 3 is a FPSRPG
No, just no. Fallout is not one of those horrid everything about it is guns FPS. It's still an RPG.What are you talking about?
Its not that its a fps now that bugs me. Its just that Bethesda was lazy with the lore(I'm going into detail with this, already did it before). They could have done slightly better gameplay wise by including more than one way to deal with a locked door(like putting a bomb on it like the old games).They have done that.
Edit: Fallout 3 as fallout not really good, as its own game its unique.
hey guys, what if this whole yogscast argument bullstuff is to draw more attention to them and their community?Its not.
Some shots of the...crater?Can I suggest putting sand on the sides of the ship?
-ImageSnap-
Still no work done on the actual impact on the mountain
The two dorans could definitely make up for the missing health from rod of ages and have some nice damage but I don't like getting lich bane before I get more AP.What do you mean Dorans?
I just found the hardest puzzle map... Ever.I... I probably should have posted a link; http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/1077957-puzzle-stunzle-v14-all-current-players-need-to-update/
I was gonna do a lets play but the first area took me 2 hours.
I love the older games, but yes the Bethesda fanboys are such hypocrites and annoys us. They say that the oldfans need to back off, then they go on about how turn based combat is boring or say something to antagonize the other side.Im not a fanboy but...
This actually ironic because I doubt that you know that he's making that face at a stupid religious statement that O'Reilly made.You said that better than I could have :c
A universe without the weak nuclear force could perhaps form the same universe.
Also, this argument is really backwards. First, life developed around the properties of nature, and that makes the argument circular because life would have developed around its circumstances. Second, if we are amazed at "just how perfect" the Earth is for us, we obviously miss how the Earth is far from perfect. Although conditions on Earth are generally ideal for the life living on it now, there are still some flaws which keep it from being anywhere near perfect.
Life could have had many possibilities just as the light bulb has many possibilities to run today, some more feasible than others. If you think about it, the life we have today is actually pretty flawed: that thing called mutations, which both hurt and help species to both die out and survive. Just as the light bulb has many possibilities to produce the same outcome of light, there are many different conditions under which life could produce the same output as we see on our planet right now.
this is why i like to listen to both sides of the story before I form opinions and then base actions off my opinions.Im still unsubscribed from the channel.