16
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6032419/Saudi-Arabia-appears-threaten-Canada-9-11-style-attack.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/saudi-arabia-s-explosion-canadian-tweet-shows-how-rules-have-n899081
https://globalnews.ca/news/4373334/saudi-twitter-account-air-canada-cn-tower
https://metro.co.uk/2018/07/12/families-told-to-remove-community-paddling-pool-so-burglars-dont-drown-7710387/
https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/family-paddling-pool-burglars-drown/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6764374/paddling-pool-burglars-strood-kent/
Maria Young and her friends who live in the same block of flats clubbed together and bought the 12 foot pool and cover for £64 during the recent heatwave.
But officials reportedly told them it either must go, or have to be emptied every night.
The company MHS Homes, which manages the properties in Strood, Kent, said the paddling pool is not safe.
Mrs Young, 47, said: ‘They said if someone breaks in they might drown in the pool.'
‘I don’t understand. People in other places are allowed them in their community gardens.'
‘A team of them came and said initially we’d have to get rid of it. They then changed their mind and said we had to put it down each night for health and safety issues.’
The pool holds 15,000 gallons of water and takes three hours to refill.
Mrs Young, who says relaxing in the pool helps aid her spine disease, added: ‘We sit out the back together and socialise. It’s completely enclosed.'
‘They said we could take it down and empty it each night but there’s a water shortage on the way. It’s a waste.'
‘It’s fun for the kids. It’s better being out in the fresh air than stuck in doors.'
‘There’s no way I’m taking it down. They’ll have to carry me out laying in it.’
https://www.newsweek.com/antifa-masking-house-bill-introduced-penalty-fifteen-years-prison-1019082
http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/11/antifa-melt-down-unmasking/
https://capitalresearch.org/article/unmasking-antifa-w-rule-of-law/
A new bill called the “Unmasking Antifa Act of 2018” seeks enhanced penalties against rioters and others who use clothing to conceal their identities while committing certain crimes.
Under the bill, anyone who "injures, oppresses, threatens, or intimidates" another person while "in disguise, including wearing a mask" will face up to 15 years of jail time, be forced to pay a fine, or both.
One of the reasons federal prosecutors were unable to secure convictions against all but a handful of the accused #DisruptJ20 rioters is because positive identification has been impossible in many cases.
Masked Antifa activists who allegedly used physical violence in the nation’s capital to try to prevent the inauguration of President Donald Annoying Orange on Jan. 20, 2017, could not be identified because many of them were dressed wholly in black attire intended to obscure their identities. Last Friday, the government filed a motion to dismiss the remaining cases against the protesters.
Such laws have a complicated history. Many of the anti-masking laws on the books date back to the Jim Crow era as a way to hinder the Ku Klux Klan, whose members notoriously donned white hoods to shield their identities as they committed violence against black Americans, Republican activists, and their property. More recently, the laws have been questioned for being overbroad.
The measure, H.R. 6054, was introduced June 8, by Rep. Daniel Donovan Jr. (R-N.Y.).
"My bill expands upon long-standing civil rights statutes to make it a crime to deprive someone of Constitutionally-guaranteed protections while masked or disguised,” Donovan said in a written statement.
"Americans have the natural right to speak and protest freely; it is not a right to throw Molotov roostertails and beat people while hiding behind a mask."
The bill also makes it clear that police and other law enforcement agents are exempt, stating that "nothing in this section shall be construed so as to deter any law enforcement officer from lawfully carrying out the duties of his office."