Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tactical Nuke

Pages: 1 ... 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 ... 513
2566
Drama / Re: molemanfrommiddlemars -- everything he posts makes no sense
« on: November 08, 2017, 01:51:46 AM »
this sounds more like kidalex smh

definitely one to talk

2567
Forum Games / Re: YOU LAUGH YOU LOSE v666
« on: November 08, 2017, 01:42:01 AM »

2568
Off Topic / Re: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD
« on: November 08, 2017, 01:13:16 AM »
I'll admit idk much about the gubnatorial race in virginia because I don't live there but you'd think basically lumping the other side into a "basket of deplorables" would make victory impossible for northam

2569
Off Topic / Re: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD
« on: November 08, 2017, 01:03:41 AM »
anyone want to talk about how Gillespie lost despite the other candidate's party suggesting everyone who voted for him was a tribal national socialist kool kids klub member who wanted to run over children

2570
Off Topic / H3 Podcast #37 - Jordan B. Peterson
« on: November 07, 2017, 04:14:16 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vx4ltQhdlhg

it's like a meeting of the minds

2571
this is like a small scale conspiracy theory post man, you’re speculating on purely the fact attacker is democrat and victim is rand paul, and you’re ignoring the fact nobody has yet to call anyone out for lying about motive/facts despite the news being several days old.

not everything is so intensely politically motivated

A "small scale conspiracy theory" isn't backed by the fact that practically every loving attack on a politician ever has been for political reasons.

But yeah, you're right. I might just be unreasonably relating this to that one incident a couple months ago where a registered Democrat and Bernie supporter tried to kill several Republican politicians (INCLUDING Rand Paul) at a baseball game.

2572
That is not at all what I said, but you can take it however you want. Just displays to everyone else your flawed reasoning here.

What you said is that the phrase "gun control" is used to basically say "fix this". Well, how are we going to fix it? Has anyone ever actually given specific ideas? You still haven't said anything about how to legislate this more than it already is in order to prevent it next time.

Meanwhile, I and pretty much everyone in the thread who is against this "gun control NOW" hysteria has specifically said that the USAF officials who handled the shooter's files should be dishonorably discharged and convicted on charges of gross negligence, which would encourage government agencies to take this kind of stuff more seriously. AKA, an actual fix that is real with real positive consequences.

The reason we can't have any reasonable dialogue on gun control and ownership is because of volatile assclowns like you who decide to attack the person rather than the point. Leave your anger and feelings at the door before you try to argue, because you're not doing yourself any favors here.

This is unbelievably ironic considering the outstanding amount of prominent lefties and liberals who are willing to blame everything on Republicans, gun owners and the NRA, and then call for "common sense gun control" without explaining specifically what it is. It's stunning.

2573
can u respond to this tho


the attorney's job is to represent the neighbor, and the neighbor, being the attacker, would want to mitigate this as much as possible
to CNN, his version of events means that it's not what everyone else is thinking (liberals attacking conservatives) and so they're okay with holding it up as the accurate depiction of events despite Paul not even saying anything yet
thus making it a liberal narrative

2574
They didn't lie about what the loving attorney said, they're holding it up as fact without regarding at all what the victim thinks. I thought lefties were always supposed to believe the victim?

2575
Here's the loving deal because you can't seem to understand the point here. Obviously something went wrong with the legal process of barring him from firearm purchasing that directly resulted in him purchasing a firearm that he shot and killed 26 innocent people with. When people are calling for "Gun control", they mean an ambiguous fix to whatever the problem or error resulted in him being allowed to purchase a firearm. That's it. There's nothing beyond calling for an explanation of what necessarily went wrong so this doesn't happen again in this way.

Oh, okay, so it's a meaningless loving virtue-signaling platitude, just like "thoughts and prayers", according to the same people who spout it constantly. Got it.

"there is no way at all that this could have been prevented with more legislation" Is a lie, you have just about as much knowledge on saying this as the people you're attacking here. It's just that while you're preferring to entrench in your belief that literally nothing could have prevented this, everyone else is thinking on how exactly it could have been prevented.

Then say what the loving solution is. Can you even do that? There isn't a loving copyright "someone's gonna steal my idea!!!!!1!1!" problem when it comes to this kind of stuff, so just blurt it out so that we can tell you specifically how your solution either wouldn't work or would've made it worse. "Common sense gun control" is one of the Dems biggest losing talking points for a reason.

2576
what a surprise, the conclusion you immediately jumped to when no details on the assault were available-- was wrong!

regardless of the fact that everyone's linking CNN, which has been proven to bend the facts in such a way as to promote liberal narratives in the past, this is the neighbor's attorney saying this, not Rand Paul or his attorney

I want to hear what they have to say about this

and it's amazing how many people on this thread are set in stone that this wasn't a political attack when every time a politician has been attacked... EVER, it has been for political reasons

I have absolutely no doubt in my mind, like someone said earlier, that if this were Bernie Sanders being attacked by a registered Republican neighbor, the thread reporting it would be dripping with smugness, hysteria and "so much for le tolerant left" memes


2577
"Annoying Orange: Gun Control Would Have Left ‘Hundreds More Dead’ In Texas Church"
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/Annoying Orange-gun-control-texas_us_5a017390e4b066c2c039e457

bold claim considering the fact we've already learned that air force non-compliance with standard gun regulations is why this person was able to get a gun

so what legislation would you suggest? redundant laws that state that the air force should follow its own rules? banning assault rifles, which would've prevented civilian intervention? there is no way at all that this could have been prevented with more legislation, considering that the whole reason that this happened was a guy with some gears to grind against a church was able to get a gun because of a logistical error

the most that can and should happen is that some air force officials get tried for negligence, much less sacked immediately

2578
sack anyone who could've allowed this to happen

I typically don't complain about how much we spend on the military but really this is what our tax dollars are going to

2579
okay honestly I know that what this guy said was the most insulting, batstuff handicapped thing you could say next to the random forgeto who said that the people who died were Annoying Orange supporters, so forget them, but are we just going to ignore that the loving United States Air Force forgot to federally file the domestic abuse conviction of the guy who punches puppies and stalks ex-girlfriends, allowing him to buy a firearm from any gun store completely legally without reproach?

Pages: 1 ... 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 ... 513