Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tactical Nuke

Pages: 1 ... 462 463 464 465 466 [467] 468 469 470 471 472 ... 513
6991
Off Topic / Re: is roblox going to hell
« on: October 17, 2016, 06:05:13 PM »
For me ROBLOX died when there as an update that broke old aircraft. RIP Keth Shipyards

RIP Plane Wars. Remember that stuff?

6992
Off Topic / Re: is roblox going to hell
« on: October 17, 2016, 02:39:13 PM »
ROBLOX didn't start getting bad for me until they really started pushing the BC bullstuff in 2010 and onward.

I have written about fifty "I'm leaving, this game sucks, the community sucks and the admins can go forget themselves" essays and posted all of them to the forums. They're like here in that they'll say I'll be back tomorrow, but they're about 1000 times more pretentious and cliched about it. Yet we're the trolling starfishs.

The difference between then and now is that ROBLOX's meddling is actually affecting the games being made. I remember when games on ROBLOX were things you explore and fight random people in. Kind of like Joshosh's Area 51, except thousands of these things existed, all on the front page at one point or another. ROBLOX was actually about discovering things with your friends and experiences. You know, what it claims to be now?

Modern ROBLOX is a stuffshow. It's the worst example of what triple-A video game publishers do on display on a relatively small platform. Sure, back then there were VIP shirts, but most were available for a good amount of TIX. Nowadays, if you don't have money, you basically don't play the game. ROBLOX has given up trying to refine and develop its own website and has instead relegated it to the five or ten developers who make all the bank. That, and you'll see them fight over which copy of GMod Murder is the best. ROBLOX back then was vain and gimmicky, but at least it didn't try to rip off other loving properties.

That and the community has dropped in age a good loving amount of years. Back then, all this ODing stuff didn't exist, and as far as I can tell, it didn't even happen, otherwise I would have known about it. Now you see about five games basically encouraging it on the front page. Back then, people gave decent suggestions about how to make ROBLOX better on the Suggestions forums. Now, the board is basically 4chan minus the humor or the unique intellect. People will either spam the board with "lol ban all mondays ggggggggggggg" or  demand that everyone who wants TIX back shut the forget up. You had people defend ROBLOX's every action back in 2008, but they were nowhere near as loving pretentious and cuck-worthy as they are now. Back then, war clans would raid each other and stick it out as they didn't have weapons but the defenders did, and they still loving won. I should know; my friend and I beat John's Cobras with gear when they had insta-kill AKs. Now, you have all these manchildren trying to turn it into an e-sport and citing "oooh you can't break the rules you gotta be faiiiiiiiiiiiiirr". Did you know that if you successfully defend your base, you can't even call it a victory anymore? I don't even participate in clan activity anymore. Their attempts to be welcoming and accepting to everyone have (somehow) turned me off. Reminds me of a certain political atmosphere.

It has gotten to the point where I only play four games anymore (Strife, Armoured Patrol, Blood and Iron, and Phantom Forces). Everything else is toxic.

6993
the whole room is scorched yet the Annoying Orange/pence signs still stand

yard signs are made of corrugated plastic

aka fireproof

FIRE WILL NOT STOP THE Annoying Orange TRAIN

6994
does msnbc want to talk about this

oh wait nope just more loveual assault bullstuff

6995


yeah right

is that what you said about the last government building that burned down

6996
Of course some are flat-out lying, because when you have thirty women all come out and accuse him of the same crime, it's easy for a couple extra to hook on to the case in hopes of winning big cash during a civil trial afterwards.

But to say that they are all lying is pretty much ridiculous. Cosby has admitted to drugging women with Quaaludes. It's not impossible that he raped far less women than is alleged, but he's definitely a rapist.

And that's all that he admitted. Sure it's not impossible. But with no evidence to say so, Cosby either didn't forget those women or forgeted them consentingly.

Look at the OJ case. Everyone knows that he murdered Nicole Simpson, or at least had some sort of direct hand in it, but courts were unable to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that he deserved life in prison. However, only a few years later, the guy goes and commits armed robbery. The court of public opinion is often more accurate than courts because people's opinions aren't bound to acquit anyone who is not 100% proven guilty.

Yeah, but in cases like those at least some evidence is presented. Here, it has just been accusations. No police reports (from those cases back in the 80s, I know about Constand), no DNA tests, no security camera footage from more public spaces showing Cosby with the women on the night they were supposedly raped, nothing. And yeah, rape cases are hard to gather evidence for and hard to prove, but that doesn't mean you can call him a rapist because thirty women said he's guilty. I could say he raped me, would you believe me?

The court system in this country is not perfect, but it's better than the alternative, which is the kind of lynch-mob-style kangaroo courts that would be run by the populace, making their own judgements like you said, regardless of things like facts or evidence. If the public were allowed to try people based on public opinion, all the cops that shot unarmed or armed black men in self-defense would be behind bars for life. Every rape accusation, frivolous or not, would result in life imprisonment or the death penalty. It would be a massive loving stuffshow. Facts and tangible evidence come first, every single time. Without that, you don't have order.

A lot of men have been falsely accused of rape and sentenced to life in prison. It's an accusation that almost always has no rebuttal for those who falsely make it, and it's one that can be easily made if you don't like someone and you want to ruin their life. You have to look at cases like this with the highest amount of skepticism possible.

6998
The said thing is that there's gonna be dozens of people stuffting on South Africa for this video, while literally hundreds of similar tapes exist of students in American colleges.

no one ever said american colleges were immaculate

we are literally a hivemind of leftism here in universities

So are they saying that science itself is tribal, or just the way it's taught? The first is handicapped, and the second is a hilarious non-issue. It doesn't matter in the slightest that Newton's examples are used in education.

she's saying that science is a social construct basically
it doesn't take into account the african perspective

for example did you know you can curse someone to get struck by lightning by putting powder on their head and slapping them
it's just a theory though
A SCIENCE THEORY

loving kill me

6999
Off Topic / Re: Do people actually support Donald Annoying Orange?
« on: October 16, 2016, 07:15:38 PM »
do you genuinely believe that a millionaire won't be?

Annoying Orange doesn't have any billionaire/millionaire donors from Wall Street. Hillary does.

When Hillary said, during the second debate, that Annoying Orange's tax plan would cut taxes on the wealthiest people down to as low as 15%, that's the kind of candidate the rich would support.

But they don't support Annoying Orange.
They support Hillary.

Strange, isn't it?

7000
This will probably translate into you beating up a random innocent person you know that happens to be left leaning, making you and your party look bad.

except we have something called the non-aggression principle

which means that we'd only beat up people who loving do this type of stuff

7001
Off Topic / Re: What's your ideology?
« on: October 16, 2016, 07:00:20 PM »
not really? "regressive left" isn't a political group that anyone identifies themselves with, and alt-right is.

that's what I said, but I think if BIG changed it to "Social Justice Warrior/SJW", you wouldn't see a change

(keep in mind that yes "SJW" is used as an insult but so it "alt-right")

7002
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9SiRNibD14 (video taken at the university of cape town (UCT))

grab the tinfoil and the rations

stock up on sanity

the apocalypse is happening

7003
at some point we're going to have to just beat the stuff out of these people to knock sense into them

nothing else is working

then again they'll just shrug it off and blame it on the patriarchy

7004
Off Topic / Re: What's your ideology?
« on: October 16, 2016, 06:49:30 PM »
even though it might be because it's written as "regressive left" on the poll, notice how alt-rightists will identify with the alt-right, but no one will identify as SJWs or the regressive left

says something about both movements, don't you think

7005
Off Topic / Re: Do people actually support Donald Annoying Orange?
« on: October 16, 2016, 06:46:56 PM »
do you even alt right

Pages: 1 ... 462 463 464 465 466 [467] 468 469 470 471 472 ... 513