Messages

391

Off Topic / Re: Misreading Usernames

« on: August 09, 2012, 07:56:59 AM »

I have crossed this thread many times and every single time I've had but one thought materialize from the electrical powerhouse that is my brain.

What a stupid idea.

There is an infinitesimal chance of someone actually reading your name as "MasterBater" or any other such permutation of your name. Truth be told, this topic would be extremely stupid except for people trying too hard to be funny. Let me go down this page and post likely misreads of each name:

Scorch: Scotch. An r can look like a t at a glance, I suppose.
MunkeyCheese: MonkeyCheese. People like to form words.
Jetlok: Jetlock. People like to form words.
GenralSkar: GeneralSkar. An a can look like an e in theory, plus the proximity of the word.
Mariobro: Nothing. People would chunk this as "Mario" and "Bro" because they are aware of what each means.
HellsSpot: Nothing. People would chunk this as "Hells" and "Spot" because they are aware of what each means.
The Titanium: Nothing. People would chunk this as "The" and "Titanium" because they are aware of what each means.
Måster Blåster: Master Blaster. å =/= a.
KILLERBUNNY: Nothing. It's in all caps. This is the easiest most distinguishable way for humans to read words.
Lamebro1: Nothing. People would chunk this as "Lame" and "Bro" because they are aware of what each means.

Regardless; I will contribute:

Llamabro1

392

Off Topic / Re: [FLOWCHART] so you think homoloveuality is sinful?

« on: August 09, 2012, 07:37:36 AM »

Ha, ha. Not even a real rebuttal. Can't prove the poster stupid with the exact type of argument it is made to counter.

I just did. Think again.

The point is that people who use this passage to go against gay marriage should not be against polygamy or infidelity, since both are defined as holy and sacred. Traditional marriage, if you will. You can't pick and choose which passages of the bible apply and which don't. So if you're against gay marriage because of this, you should also be supporting someone's right to have multiple wives and concubines. Most aren't. Oh, and you're also obligated to marry your rapist/victim.

The others are irrelevant information. However, if the bible goes that far to include all of those things in the definition of marriage, then that's definitely working against homoloveuals as they weren't included in the very broad list.

But the creation parable was written in that scenario. So the point still stands?

The point does not still stand, the point in the first place is handicapped. Adam and Eve had 3 sons, incestual relations with their mother then their own siblings would have created permutations in our DNA that would give descendants of Adam and Eve horrible diseases and disabilities. Regardless of this fact, are you trying to tell me that had the story been written with many couples any single one of them would have been gay? They wouldn't have. The argument is 100% invalid.

You're going to have to try harder, with better arguments, not loveism.

It was a joke. However, that could be a real belief. In which case, the point stands.

This is blasphemy. Paul is not God and you don't live by what he says, you live by God's word. Paul is nothing.

I don't go to church. I don't go near church. I would burst into flames. I don't give a forget what rules the church obeys.

You wouldn't, but it's the most popular piece of 'proof' against gay marriage.

It's not my fault most people against gay marriage are religious mondays.

'Love your neighbor as I love you'.

I doubt he meant in a homoloveual way.

I recommend you laugh from the side lines. I've never lost an argument on these forums and I don't plan on doing it any time soon, even if it requires 80 pages of typed essays.

393

Off Topic / Re: [FLOWCHART] so you think homoloveuality is sinful?

« on: August 09, 2012, 07:17:42 AM »

Because it just disgusts me, dangit!: Yes, it should be discriminated against because I think gay love is icky. This is the real world. You grow up.
Because the bible clearly defines marriage as one-man-one-woman!: Yeah, okay, but where's the gay dudes? The point still stands.
Because God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve!: The bible was not written in the time when the earth wasn't populated.
Because the new testament says so!: Yeah, and women shouldn't assume authority over a man.
Shall modern day churches live by all of pauls values?: Yes, and thanks.
Because the Old Testmaent said so!: Your only valid point, however I would not bring this up in the first place.
Because Jesus said so!: I wouldn't say this either but I'm 100% positive not every single word Jesus said was documented.
The rest of culture will advance forward without you.: No, it won't. loving California, arguably the most liberal state in this goddamned country voted against same love marriage. Culture will not advance without me. It will be a long time before the social stigma of same love marriage passes and by then I will be dead. I will be right on cue with society.

note: these arguments were purely for the purpose of proving the poster stupid, not my real beliefs.

394

Off Topic / Re: Dumbest ads you've seen

« on: August 09, 2012, 07:08:51 AM »

This is the upper end of an ad I encountered today while actually not on a research site. You can guess what was below, but I didn't know Badspot's tolerance for censors so I just cut it off. Regardless, what kind of love hookup site advertises ugly girls?

395

Off Topic / Re: Stop Bullying: Speak Up Comics - Revival

« on: August 09, 2012, 07:04:37 AM »

i lost my loving stuff at the "looks like stuff" one. I saw it earlier but didn't notice the background until you pointed it out. Oh my god. His face is priceless. A+

396

Off Topic / Re: Ohio boy hospitalized after 4-day Xbox Live marathon - Jesus loving Christ.

« on: August 09, 2012, 07:00:35 AM »

How much more forgeted up can society get?

That is the single most appropriate response to something being taken away from you I have ever heard of. I was going to post that but you beat me to it. Holy stuff. This kid is my loving idol.

397

Modification Help / Re: TCPObject Saving binary data of unknown length

« on: August 09, 2012, 02:01:52 AM »

stuff

398

Modification Help / Re: TCPObject Saving binary data of unknown length

« on: August 09, 2012, 01:26:37 AM »

I doubt it works that way, try it.

I would if I had a PHP script configured to accept and save a file, but I'm too lazy to do that.

399

Modification Help / Re: TCPObject Saving binary data of unknown length

« on: August 09, 2012, 12:55:42 AM »

It's impossible.

I'm not 100% sure but I think fileObjects read from binary so you may be able to send their binary data through a TCP object as long as you don't store it in a variable any time between.

400

Modification Help / Re: Trust Invite

« on: August 09, 2012, 12:41:33 AM »

Pretty sure the key has to work at some point for you to actually be able to use it.

No. You're just wrong, as far as I know you've never had a revoked key so there's no way you would know. The way I know if my ID has been revoked (which for me is a constant daily worry) is when the giant DEMO sign pops up and a popup that say "Invalid Key" and the bottom flashes "ID Not Found".

401

Modification Help / Re: Trust Invite

« on: August 09, 2012, 12:37:22 AM »

As long as you connect once, you can play at any time with no demo limits.

This is incorrect. Try the authentication key I posted. I'll take a screenshot.

402

Modification Help / Re: Trust Invite

« on: August 09, 2012, 12:30:08 AM »

I actually don't think you have a case.

You are still able to access Blockland on your computer; that is not restricted. Badspot banned you from the auth server, which is his private property, meaning he has every right to do so.

Not if you pay to use it. Go play any other game, World of Warcraft I know states that accounts are owned by Blizzard and can be terminated at any point in time, same with most other games. Blockland on the other hand promises only a "lifetime membership" which I have, despite legitimately paying for, had revoked. I definitely have a case, whether or not I'd launch a case against Eric Hartman is a completely different story.

Plus when you buy Blockland, you are paying for single player only, multiplayer being an added bonus, and since the key still works for single player...

The key does not work for single player. An authentication failure puts you in demo mode. Not to mention the other parts of your statement are completely false.

Here's a revoked authentication key ABB5Z-2XRM-ZYWT-L522

403

Modification Help / Re: Score saver help

« on: August 08, 2012, 11:33:41 PM »

Or -100 to check for excessive team killing and make them not loose any points when they Self Delete.

Okay, yes we are aware that you can assign which activities earn you negative points. That wasn't the point of my post.

404

Modification Help / Re: Score saver help

« on: August 08, 2012, 09:37:23 PM »

its supposed to both save scores and manage freekilling

yes, we understand, but you're checking to see if their score is less than -100. Which would mean if they Self Deleted 100 times without killing anybody they would then be kicked for freekilling. You're wanting to check to see if their score is above 100, which would mean they killed over 100 people.

405

Modification Help / Re: Chat Bot HELP

« on: August 08, 2012, 09:34:24 PM »

Is this a client-sided chat bot or server-sided? Because I have a client chat bot I could pm you it.

And now he gets 0 help. If he would have just acknowledged that it's better for him to have it explained to him I would have helped him, but now he gets no help and a code example that's too advanced for him to understand.