901
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 06:19:41 PM »
can we drop the argument and discuss how toxicology is the light the forums need
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
902
Games / Re: Post games only you have played/games noone has ever talked about
« on: November 26, 2017, 06:13:35 PM »
lego racers was pretty epic
903
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 06:01:11 PM »
it go down
904
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 05:29:27 PM »this doesn't work as a zingerforget... forget!
hit the showers, try harder next time bud. i believe in ya
905
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 05:23:58 PM »news alert: group of dumb kids and socially handicapped 19 year old spend nine pages patting themselves on the back because They Might Have Trolled Someonebrother youve been patting yourself on the back for the last 60000 billion pages because THere Is A Troll
907
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:14:47 PM »
this thread really has become something hasnt it
908
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 03:00:39 AM »You're acting as if I'm the one who banned toxicologywhat the god damn
This is a good example of flamingalso that was provoked
by your logic i shouldnt be banned
Kidalex90, you put a bunch of screenshots in your signature to demonstrate your "bad boy status", showing bans and people getting upset with you. Do you really believe you have any ground to stand on when discussing who is or isn't ban-worthy, when you can't even seem to understand the rules for yourself?also this is unprovoked
by your logic he should be banned
909
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:56:14 AM »You can use critical thinking to discern the difference between being insulting and 'flaming', since I happened to put that really big word "Unprovoked" a couple times to describe flaming. Based on the precedence for the rule, it seems Badspot's definition for flaming is unprovoked personal attacks, or anything of the sort.except it was provoked because mcjob ip banned toxicology, and thus, dreams of cheese
also shouldnt that mean mcjob should be banned because of this post
910
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:43:40 AM »Kidalex90, you put a bunch of screenshots in your signature to demonstrate your "bad boy status", showing bans and people getting upset with you. Do you really believe you have any ground to stand on when discussion who is or isn't ban-worthy, when you can't even seem to understand the rules for yourself?we all know that youre smashing your head on your desk right now because of this thread and your crippling debt
911
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:41:07 AM »Reading comprehension isn't your strongest trait, aye?he was banned because he insulted mcjob which by your logic he shouldnt have been banned for
i am very sorrowful that youre illiterate and probably suffer from numerous cognitive disabilities
912
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:36:27 AM »My understanding is that the bounds of the rule is a threshold of being an starfish towards someone unwarranted. Calling someone a stupid starfish (or what have you) in an argument isn't bannable, but copying somebody's movie thread to mock them unprovoked is.then by your logic toxicologys ban is complete bullstuff
"Flaming" is just unwarranted personal attacks anyways. Being a richard or insulting people isn't flaming on it's own.
you are not the brightest person
913
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:32:59 AM »What.you said you flame people in a "non bannable way"
Did you even read what I said? I explained exactly why my posts aren't flaming.
914
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:30:18 AM »Because I don't flame people in a bannable way. I learned that lesson the hard way, and I'm glad I did because it's made me a better person as a result.so youre basically admiting to flaming
Badspot bans people for flaming when they write a post that is intentionally derogatory or offensive towards a specific individual, without any further context or clarification. The posts are straight up insults, played straight without a hint of irony or comedy, either for the sake of creating an argument or to deride a user when it is irrelevant to the context of the thread.
When I write an angry post towards somebody, I don't just insult their negative characteristics and leave at that. In the past, I used to tell people to just "forget off", or "Die", or I would say something like "Shut the forget up you cunt". Those kinds of posts are flaming because they add nothing to the conversation, and yet create a hostile atmosphere that can lead into bigger arguments. Nowadays, when I write a post about a person I don't like, I go on to explain why those characteristics are negative in the context of the thread. I give enough detail for the post to be positively contributing to the flow of the topic. It's not bullying or harassment; it's a thorough breakdown of exactly why I feel somebody has done something wrong.
tl;dr I'm not interrupting the thread to be overly hostile, while that's exactly what Toxicology did
I don't get Toxicology's game. I said some things that were personally insulting to him, sure, but rather than smarten up and try to prove me wrong in a mature way to make me look like an idiot for being wrong, he instead acted like a spoiled brat, going to various topics I posted in with deliberate bait meant to incite me.
The whole movie night fiasco was at first a simple prank on his behalf (which took him 2 hours to setup, btw), but you can tell he actually got personally invested in it and started to care about the numbers and attention. When my CyTube event didn't fail, but instead everybody was actually having fun, he couldn't hack it that I got exactly what I wanted out of it. I don't care that there was only maybe 15 people at the peak, because those who were there actively contributed to the chat and we had a great time.
His salt is delectable because it tastes like disappointment and jealousy. He should take some time off these forums to sort out his own life and figure out what he actually wants to achieve, that isn't just trying to troll some guy on the internet whose old job was to deal with people like him all the time.
915
Off Topic / Re: a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
« on: November 26, 2017, 02:23:40 AM »If you think he should have been banned, your judgement is either misguided, or the post just wasn't reported and got overlooked. If you think it's the latter, report the post. Otherwise, there's really no use in bitching here about it. That's not really gonna make a difference.you tell people to calm down in arguments yet here you are presumably smashing your keyboard to forgetin pieces as you type this