151
General Discussion / Re: Wicked & Crown's CityRPG | Automatic Donations Open
« on: June 05, 2014, 05:36:33 AM »
Am I missing something or is there no actual list where each of the jobs is properly described?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
152
Off Topic / Re: Furling's new game in the future.
« on: June 04, 2014, 09:24:31 PM »
You should have a look at Unreal Engine 4 furling
It has a visual scripting system that might work quite well for you in your development
It has a visual scripting system that might work quite well for you in your development
153
General Discussion / Re: Petition for Badspot to Alter Zone Gravity to Work With Vehicles
« on: June 04, 2014, 09:20:51 PM »
Mods really make this game what it is
It's strikes me as absolutely insane that badspot wouldn't do everything he could to support modders. I don't see people pestering him for content, I see people pestering him to fix the broken stuff that is restricting them from making content. It mostly confuses me from a business standpoint. I don't see how the "better stuff on the people who want to invest their own time creating content for my game" mindset is sustainable. With his performance in the kalphiter topic, I don't see it changing either, shame really.
It's strikes me as absolutely insane that badspot wouldn't do everything he could to support modders. I don't see people pestering him for content, I see people pestering him to fix the broken stuff that is restricting them from making content. It mostly confuses me from a business standpoint. I don't see how the "better stuff on the people who want to invest their own time creating content for my game" mindset is sustainable. With his performance in the kalphiter topic, I don't see it changing either, shame really.
154
Off Topic / Re: Probably moving again..
« on: June 04, 2014, 07:16:41 PM »
I totally read that first sentence as "my dad is leaving my uncle"
155
Off Topic / Re: What is your view on top freedom?
« on: June 04, 2014, 07:13:37 PM »Well, speaking about the Australian summer really.I don't know if I'd paint everyone who does this with that brush. You're looking at it from your own cultural perspective. Over here it's not generally seen to be reckless or taboo, so you can't really come to those sorts of conclusions because they don't hold the same here. Granted, we do have higher incidence of skin cancer, but I myself do it and I'm very conscious of wearing sunscreen. Basically, if it's just "idiots" that do it in the UK, you can't then apply that same logic to Australia.
Australia is a particularly hot place, and parading around without clothing on is a good way to get burnt and promote development of skin cancer (assuming of course that you don't use any sun screens, but I dare say the sort of person who wanders around in the glaring sunlight without a shirt on doesn't pay too much attention to sun safety).
I also don't buy into the idea that we need to "protect the children". There's nothing inherently stressing about a child seeing breasts. It's only an issue when they've been socialized into thinking it's taboo. They will react the way their parents react, and be stressed if their parents are stressed.
156
Off Topic / Re: What is your view on top freedom?
« on: June 04, 2014, 07:00:29 PM »And surely Australia's one of the dumbest places to do that anyway?I'm not sure what you mean?
157
Off Topic / Re: What is your view on top freedom?
« on: June 04, 2014, 06:57:22 PM »Not acceptable.Depends on where you are I guess.
It's not even acceptable for men to wander around towns and streets without a shirt on.
That's commonplace all over Australia.
158
Off Topic / Re: WTF PAKISTAN??
« on: June 03, 2014, 06:37:04 PM »Scientists have never actively observed the theory of evolution taking place. They have only observed organisms adapting to their environment, and those adaptations have always only gone so far.This part was my personal favorite.
They've adapted to their environment but "only so far"? Are you expecting evolution to work a little more like this?
You have a fundamental lack of understanding if gradual adaptations to environmental pressures doesn't equate to evolution in your mind
159
Off Topic / Re: WTF PAKISTAN??
« on: June 03, 2014, 06:05:53 PM »This is exactly the problem. You're clearly not interested in having a respectful conversation about this, but instead you prefer to ignorantly dismiss creationism as a hilarious mythological fairy tale instead of examine creation's arguments and explain why you prefer evolution over them. To be truthful, I don't want to spend my time now arguing about it either, but I was curious why you believed what you did. Instead you've made it very clear that creationism is a joke to you and you've already made up your mind and that anything contrary to evolution is not true.Don't back out just yet, I was looking forward to seeing the evidence for creationism
160
Drama / Re: Pacnet's RTB Replacement - Lifetime: Precisely 2 and a half minutes.
« on: February 10, 2014, 07:07:56 PM »was that supposed to be funny? I just don't want people to bash their project so I air left it. you're trying too hard as usual / as expected and I know that the others will find this to be a huge burn / godly post but that's more or less expected.do you understand how much worse you make this every time you reply?
between you and tetroturd this is going to be a hilarious PR disaster
161
Drama / Re: Pacnet's RTB Replacement - Lifetime: Precisely 2 and a half minutes.
« on: February 10, 2014, 05:11:07 PM »
what were you guys aiming to achieve when you posted that topic then?
i don't agree with taboo posting this, but you guys almost certainly didn't want actual feedback on what we think after that knee-jerk topic lock.
i don't agree with taboo posting this, but you guys almost certainly didn't want actual feedback on what we think after that knee-jerk topic lock.
162
Drama / Re: One joke, and all hell breaks loose.
« on: February 10, 2014, 05:09:06 PM »[IaMG]http://i58.tinypic.com/if79d2.jpg[/img]if anyone didn't already think you were 10, they certainly do now
you have literally not made a right decision since you posted that "joke"
163
Off Topic / Re: @DerpTrolling is back again?
« on: February 10, 2014, 04:58:19 PM »
i dunno what it means man, but at any rate, we better give them heaps of attention to make sure they stop!
that'll work
that'll work
164
Development / Re: 2013/02/10 - Blockland r1931
« on: February 10, 2014, 04:57:19 PM »
pssst, year is wrong in the topic title
165
Drama / Re: Pacnet's RTB Replacement - Lifetime: Precisely 2 and a half minutes.
« on: February 10, 2014, 04:53:47 PM »First question:First, no? I rather wait for the BAM team, a group of generally respected coders to come up with a tried and tested solution.
Well, aren't you glad we're trying to make a new one?
Second question:
Well, none, this will be our first.
Second, so none of you have a good, or any history in managing/ finishing projects. Prospects look good so far!