Messages

76

Off Topic / Re: Religion.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:57:55 PM »

ok how is it possible to have documented observation of something like another universe? sounds like people reasoned and came up with that.

What? It's not another universe, it's radiation that we can see from the explosion. Since light travels at a maximum distance, the further out into space we look the longer ago we see. So, if we look to the furthest outreaches of space, we see radiation from the big bang.

God always was, always is, and always will be. It stands to reason he exists outside the boundaries of his own creation, because otherwise he would be bound by things like time. You can see the beautiful design intertwined with creation, such as the human mind, the orderly nature of atoms, the perfect balance of oxygen in the atmosphere. its rediculous to say it came from chance and randomness.

The 'beautiful design' you experience as beautiful because Evolution designed you to perceive such things as beautiful for these 'beautiful' things are desirable. The human mind comes from a very long development, from microscopic multicellular organisms with a single light reactive cell that because it could perceive light, it could find plants to consume. Some of these mutated, and now they have two light reactive cells, thus doubling their effectiveness. Multiply by thousands of generations, and you develop a basic neural network. Everything in nature can be explained by a mathematical concept that is supported by evolution, called the Fibonacci sequence. There is more scientific evidence in support of evolution than there is in support of gravity. It's ridiculous to say that God created the perfect balance of oxygen in the atmosphere, because Evolution explains that by saying we evolved to operate on that exact balance of oxygen. If it had been a different oxidizer in the atmosphere, we would have evolved to use that instead of oxygen. It's ridiculous to say some supernatural sentient being manually designed an infinite number of universes that represent every possible possibility of everything, ever.

77

Off Topic / Re: Religion.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:50:16 PM »

it's a very abstract idea that i have probably explained very poorly, sorry lol

No, you explained it perfectly. That's essentially what I was saying but opened a can of worms which is that time is a dimension and not a flow. This is the best way I can think to explain it:

Time is a dimension, if you disagree look it up. Now that we understand it's a dimension, think about the other dimensions you know of. Just because you are in your chair right now, in a specific spot in all 3 dimensions, and have your vision blocked by a computer screen, does not mean that the area 3 feet ahead of you that you do not perceive is not there. Just because you're sitting at a current position in the time dimension, does not mean the area in front of you that you can not see is not there. The universe is an object, just like you and me, and if you look at it in different spots on the 4th dimension you will see it at various sizes. It will grow, reach a maximum size, then contract. Once it contracts to the smallest possible size, it will explode again, grow, shrink, explode, grow, shrink, explode. It has no definable beginning, and has no definable end.

78

Off Topic / Re: Religion.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:43:01 PM »

Well?

where did the supercondenced gas come from?
What caused it to explode?was it growing?
What created the "big bang"?
I figure that the rapid expansion can just as easily be accounted for by the biblical creation of heavens and earth.

It wasn't a supercondenced gas, it was a previous universe that had shrunk to a singularity, and once something shrinks to a singularity that means there is an infinite amount of pressure inside the smallest possible space, and for those who don't know, tons of energy in a small space = explosion.

Where did the previous universe come from? Simple. There's always been a universe. Where'd god come from?

79

Off Topic / Re: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:39:05 PM »

Lol.
That's even worse.
Who the forget, who feels the need to smoke, asks someone if they should?

She wanted to smoke and was nervous about it so she asked a friend for their advice to comfort herself. It's a normal human reaction to seek approval in others before making seemingly big decisions. The fact that she knows me online is completely irrelevant to human nature.

who feels the need to have unsafe love with their gf and then post about how you knocked her up to a bunch of underaged teens? stop being such a joker lol.

She was on the pill, so technically it was safe.

80

Off Topic / Re: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:35:34 PM »

The point is someone was told by her that she was smoking, right?
So she spoke about her smoking to an online person, right?

She asked for my advice because she didn't know whether or not she should go for it. Get forgeted.

81

Off Topic / Re: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:32:26 PM »

A person who smokes weed to smoke doesn't talk about it, and sure as hell doesn't post it on an online forum.

It's so clearly for attention/fitting in.

I told her to post here.

82

Off Topic / Re: Religion.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:31:47 PM »

There is an immense amount of data supporting the Big Bang theory. In fact, anyone with a telescope can see remnants of it. It explains everything we know about physics. Without the assumption that The Big Bang started the universe, Einstein would have been unable to draft his laws of physics. By rejecting this blatantly obvious theory, you are being immensely ignorant.

83

Off Topic / Re: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

« on: December 05, 2012, 07:28:03 PM »

Oh great, another wannabe pothead.

Wannabe pothead? All she posted was a pic of her nug and said it was her first. You are the biggest carrot on this forum, I swear.

84

Off Topic / Re: The Rec. Drug Thread - FAQ, Q&A, and general information.

« on: December 05, 2012, 06:34:20 PM »

Please welcome our newest stoner blockland resident: BubbaGum.

85

Modification Help / Re: Coding issue

« on: December 05, 2012, 03:30:25 AM »

Confused.cs is part of the smiley system. It's sending the message. I got a idea. When I'm on vacation, I'll upload the .ZIP to mediafire for alpha testing, that's the best I can do.

My bad, I forgot you already had a folder in add-ons. Rename "Confused.cs" to "server.cs" and create a "description.txt"

When you start a server, Blockland scans for folders with "server.cs" in them, and if there is also a "description.txt" it automatically loads them. If they are under any other name (i.e. "Confused.cs") it will not load them.

86

Off Topic / Re: See who stalks your facebook page! :D

« on: December 05, 2012, 03:26:36 AM »

You wish. It's an unordered list of who's in your chat box. Notice that you'll never pull a name that isn't on there.

87

Modification Help / Re: Coding issue

« on: December 05, 2012, 03:04:46 AM »

Rename confused.cs "server.cs" and put it in Add-Ons/Script_Confused/server.cs

Then, name a file called "description.txt" and put something in it like your name, and put it in Add-Ons/Script_Confused/description.txt

It should work now.

88

Off Topic / Re: Top 5 favorite people on the forums

« on: December 04, 2012, 11:13:23 PM »

if u love me why wont u text me

Thanks for texting me back.

89

Off Topic / Re: The EDM Megathread - Monday Monstercat release!

« on: December 04, 2012, 10:58:30 PM »

there's a specific hardstyle BPM?
there are specific hardstyle kicks?
there's a specific "correct reverb sound" wtf

that's not how i'd define a genre, but w/e

150BPM is the specific BPM for Hardstyle. Nobody produces outside of it anymore, but old stuff was produced at 140.
Hardstyle kicks have a certain sound to them, they're really hollow and heavy. This kick is too compressed, it sounds awful.

90

Off Topic / Re: The EDM Megathread - Monday Monstercat release!

« on: December 04, 2012, 10:53:11 PM »

The reason you think it sounds like Hardstyle is because it's the only genre you know of that uses such a prominent kick with a long decay. Aside from that, the BPM is wrong, the synths are wrong, the kick is too high pitched and not the correct reverb sound, the structure of the song is wrong, literally everything aside from that kick is NOTHING like Hardstyle. Your misclassification is a result of ignorance, even Ephixa didn't classify it as Hardstyle, he classified it as "Yacht House."