Messages

76

Add-Ons / Re: Banana Player - THE MOST CRUEL PUNISHMENT IN EXISTANCE (v1.000001)

« on: October 30, 2013, 09:47:27 PM »

I made a Banana Party server. No one joined for a long time so it died quickly.

Rape Mod + Bananas.

77

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 09:43:12 PM »

Why am I not in the comic?
Part three better involve me.

78

Add-Ons / Re: Banana Player - THE MOST CRUEL PUNISHMENT IN EXISTANCE (v1.000001)

« on: October 30, 2013, 07:55:47 PM »

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50959273/Blockland%20Private/Client_BananaParty.zip
go to a server with this in your addon folder typing /bananaParty or /bananaAll will make everyone a banana

I beat you to it.
I already have a forcebanana script that forces you to be a banana on spawn.

79

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 06:42:14 PM »

Do you think I can move on?? Of course, I don't have to worry about new users filling in the slots that will be vacant when people quit my hosting service.
You know, I'm thinking of not ending it.

Here's a good idea: quit being greedy for money and just end your hosting service. RTB is the best hosting service for blockland and is non-profit while yours was hosted from...

If you really want money, try dog walking. I heard about a guy who scores $30 a week from just walking all of his neighbor's dogs. Sure it's not as much as it would be with a real job, but it's still easy money.

80

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 06:31:48 PM »

He could get his key revoked, he did fess up to DoS'ing which is a federal offense so badspot could easily punish you that way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack#Legality

Didn't Setro get key revoked for DoS'ing a server?

81

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 06:27:10 PM »

Well, do you think I will be banned now?

You should probably learn your lesson and move on because right now your reputation has been shredded and crapped on by thousands of mammoths.
What was your entire plan? Were you upset that you didn't get very much money and attacked RTB so people would come to you?

82

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 06:18:02 PM »

Creative?

really
you have to do this in such a roundabout way
it bothers me so much I drew that for the sole purpose of this post

(though I did see the GD thread but this is late because I was drawing this)

Yes, Hammer's put on a fun and laughable game of Forum Detective where the criminal DoS'd RTB but then said he didn't do it. Constantly changing his story and then pointing the finger at Criminal #2 just to admit he was actually the real criminal.
Sheesh.

no

:c

83

General Discussion / Re: HamHost hosting service: Shutting down

« on: October 30, 2013, 06:13:13 PM »

Goodbye. You won't be missed.
Thank you for the laughable games on the drama thread.

84

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 03:56:06 PM »

I removed the link because too many people downloaded the file, and I don't want to be banned for distributing shady executable files.

We know it's shady, so we're trying to figure this out. By taking it down, you practically revealed yourself in my eyes beyond reasonable doubt guilty of this.
You're also constantly dodging my posts.

No response? Did you hit post too early or did you just mix up the order?
If it's shady, you shouldn't have put it on your website. When someone finds it, it's too late to take it down otherwise you'll pretty much be proven.

Well, I'm glad that this file is not malware.
The only suspect left is Pacnet, because I know I didn't do the crime.

Except we do know you did it. You are the suspect, same with Pacnet except you're a bigger suspect. You cannot say you're not a suspect in this case.

85

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 03:49:23 PM »

Wow, nice.
Hammereditor removed the download link.
If anyone still has it, can they put it up so someone can brown townyze it to see what it is exactly?

I saw that coming from a MILE.
That pretty much closes this case. Hammer is guilty.
If the file would bring ANY suspicion to him, of course he'd take it down so no one can see it. Soon after you posted about the file, Hammer takes it down to keep him on "innocent" levels.
That just makes you the #1 Suspect.
Congratulations, Hammer! You're officially a Grade-A moron who attacked RTB and then tried to pawn it off on someone else.

86

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 03:32:48 PM »

There's no point to this any more. Hammer will not admit it even though everything he's saying is making him sound more and more guilty.
Stocking already listed the two possibilities.

1. Hammer is the hacker but isn't that much of a douchebag to outright frame his brother
2. Hammer and Pacnet are the same person and he's trying to use his sockpuppet account as a smokescreen

We all know Hammer is in the wrong, stop denying it.
If Pacnet posts here and explains this, it won't be very hard to tell if it's Hammer or not.

I found the "virus"
It's on hammereditor's website, on this page.
http://www.hammereditor.net/private/

What is this exactly? A DoS bot?

87

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 02:21:02 PM »

Possible Red Flags that Hammereditor did this:

• Acting "Scientific" saying that we need evidence or else any claim that we make is wrong, as well as he's saying "it could be me or Pacnet" instead of saying "I didn't do it."
• Passing the blame on Pacnet. Again, this goes with him acting scientific. He's accusing Pacnet of doing it saying that he is his brother.
• His hosting service is terrible and he wanted it out of the way so he could rake in the cash (assumption).
• Changing his story, going back and forth from "Pacnet did it or I did it" to "It's malware!"
• There's very little chance that a RAT would be created just to attack RTB and if there is it was probably created by a notorious troll like Eepos or Lando The Climber who gave him the add-on in the shade, which makes him extremely stupid to still download it.

• Acting strange and aggressive towards people who are siding against him. Sure anyone being accused of something would do this, but when it gets to the point when he blatantly insults someone for thinking a comic about him was funny, you can't say that it's not suspicious.
• Did I mention he's trying way too hard to seem professional? In this entire thread he's been coming up with random conclusions as to how this happened when we all know he's guilty. His resort is to, again, be scientific and use a lot of vocabulary to make him seem right.

Pretty sure there's a lot more, but honestly with all of these up there I assure you that there's no where for him to go.
Face it, Hammer. You're obviously guilty of this. Just admit it and quit acting like you aren't in the wrong.

88

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 02:06:28 PM »

We should just make a poll on what to do.

• Ban and revoke Hammereditor
• Ban and revoke Pacnet
• Ban and revoke them both
• Do nothing

Except Hammer will probably make alternates and just vote on "Ban and revoke Pacnet" or "do nothing".

89

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 12:17:39 PM »

The hacker is either Hammereditor or Pacnet, and neither of us will admit to anything.

Easy solution: revoke and ban both keys

Do you really think Pacnet would be guilty here? Sure he's had a notable history of script kiddy-ing but if he did attack RTB and use Pork & Bean's I.P why would Pork & Bean's be acting so strange and constantly be treating this like a courtroom? He should give us evidence rather than constantly blaming it on malware then changing his story to "Pacnet did it."

90

Drama / Re: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread

« on: October 30, 2013, 09:22:43 AM »

At least I didn't deserve the ban.
Ephialtes did it just because I am a suspect, not a known culprit.

Read the comic.
Quit acting like this is a courtroom and a real life jail. This is a forum about things that look like legos. It even says in the Terms & Conditions that they can ban and revoke you for WHATEVER THEY WANT.