Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
not the point. the point is publicity.i dont care about publicity and never said i wouldnt want them to do it. actually, i really dont care at all. i'm just saying what i think about indie turning into a "style"
why not? these seems quite interestinggross. why does this indie style seem so forced. it's like its a fashion statement to be an indie developer.
ya i have heard about your catapult and it is vary nice... but what i am thinking were it has some feature of the default add on the pirate cannon to apply to the catapult like for example if you hold down the fire button the projectile will go farther and how the cannon has a full horizontal 360 spin.. I am kind of thinking it would look similar to the pirate cannonyou can hold it down and it will shoot farther/shorter. it also can rotate.
I have no idea what you are talking about.i don't see how what he said is confusing. instead of having playertypes like 100 health, 150 health, he wants it so that you can adjust the "max health" of someone using events. you would assign a maxhealth variable to the client and make it so it can be adjusted with events (it also has to save). he needs the damage function to be packaged so it works with the health system he has.
I know how to make it since I have my own, but what you are saying doesn't make any sense to me.
Thank you :3
sarcasm
Damnit.lol i thought this was really funny actually. Nether just sounds generic i'd actually prefer some edgy wannabe JRPG name like The Agronox Void or something.
Oh god not this 1,000 quote stuff again.You did the same quote thing as me, except you didn't add in quotes just making it harder to pin what response was to what point. I'll respond to each point you try to make and refute it if I can, i'm not going to dumb down my argument because you want me to. If you don't want me to undermine what you say, don't say so much.
Holy stuff why does no one realize that discussing things in a public space is what a loving forum is designed to do?! Or are you just mad that I disagree with you?no stuff it's a place to discus this, but that doesn't mean it should be a stuff-fest all over the place. we have boards for a reason, to keep crap where it belongs. we have the drama board to keep that crap from popping up randomly. we have individual topics to keep discussion about THAT TOPIC there.
So is this gonna be a regular thing between you two? You did it in that other topic, too. Maybe next time you debate stuff related to the S/S update, one of you could kick off with a dramatic "So we meet again!"i do not think the update itself is bad, i think that it was worse than what they showed off, but i still think it looks better on slate than what we had on slate. i initially posted to add on to someone else who was angered that the developers didn't release what they originally showed. i see nothing wrong with debate, but i will respond to marcem in PMs if he decides to continue trying to prove me wrong, since the official topic for discussing things like this was locked, and this topic is not really the right place, while the other topic was more suited.
Back when I had demo I would do nothing but build little forts in Slopes.i did this with the gsf house maps. i always liked playing in houses a while ago.
Ahhh good times
Those lightmaps look like ass still. Working with interiors was near impossible at the scale that blockland tended to deal with. There is no radiosity so everything just looks bland and you can't differentiate it. It's really ugly.this is how max shaders look inside as well. i usually run shaders off or minimum inside, because at least then it's not one flat shade.
Of course a work in progress is going to look different when it's released. I'm not entirely sure why the lights look like they do in the first shots, maybe they used a different shading algorithm that didn't look as good (because shadows don't work in layers).I think this picture does the original shaders more justice. The shadows blend and it isn't just a flat transition.
The high FPS could be explained by it being a DoF screenshot, it's not running in real time there.then why the hell are they posting DoF pictures. if it's not running real time what's the god-damn point? for a GRAPHICS update, I want to see what my game will look like when i actually play it, not after it's been passed through a bunch of filters to produce an image that looks better than the actual thing. if you're reading an article on the new graphics technology a developer is bringing for their engine/game or something, you wouldn't expect them to post pictures of some render, you'd expect them to show off what it can do in real time, because you'll be playing the god-damn game in real time. it's advertising a new REAL TIME graphical advancement, not a new rendering system to make your 3D scene render nicer.
Why should the environment be the only thing that is shaded? You're spending most of your time looking at the bricks.I do not think the environment should be the only thing shaded, so I do not know why you asked this question. nor do I think that the previous update's graphics look better (though i like shaders off in some situations). The whole post was against how they purposely displayed v20 graphics in a poor manner and displayed v21 graphics in a manner that showed them looking better than what they were when released.
The thing is I've never see anyone complain about how the shaders don't look the same in the preview.
i hate when developers do stuff like this. they show us a picture of multi-layered shading, then give us two toned shading instead. it's a blatant lie and that's that. the whole front post of the "S&S vs I&T" Main Post was a ruse. Show your shaders looking all good (not even how they look in the actual game) and present the maps in a poor fashion to try to sway the other side.
wow way to post pink slopes, a bug that didn't even exist in the game until v20. I don't see how that's really "bad" considering it worked fine until you (devs) decided to change something.
way to take a picture in the far corner of the map instead of showing the actual entire thing. i'm honestly not sure if this is some kind of bait/troll picture or not.
"
