Messages

2626

Games / Re: Suggest Action Rpg's (Now attracting handicaps apparently)

« on: November 09, 2012, 10:27:26 PM »

It isn't out yet, but Cube World would be something to look for in the future. It is a hack-n-slash action rpg based around voxels, which amount to 3d sprites, so it sounds like what you are looking for.

2627

Games / Re: Suggest Action Rpg's (Now attracting handicaps apparently)

« on: November 09, 2012, 10:16:21 PM »

I don't play that big of a game variety. The closest action rpg game I play to Legend of Zelda is probably Assassin's Creed, but that is probably closer to Skyrim than LoZ.

So I wish I could help.

2628

Games / Re: Suggest Action Rpg's (Now attracting handicaps apparently)

« on: November 09, 2012, 10:13:26 PM »

ITT: Someone asks for a game suggestion and then when he declines something because it is out of genre and nothing at all like the specific style that he asked for the suggester gets butthurt and claims he has no taste in games.

2629

Off Topic / Re: We are all gonna die

« on: November 09, 2012, 09:30:05 PM »

And visible light is higher in the electromagnetic spetrum than microwaves

Higher doesn't necessarily mean more dangerous though. One of the reasons why microwaves can be dangerous is because they emit the frequency that vibrates water molecules, which means they could literally boil your blood. But even this frequency is not too dangerous in small amounts because some cellphones operate on the same frequency.

Infrared is also lower than visible light, but enough of that can hurt you.

2630

Games / Re: League of Legends - Megathread

« on: November 09, 2012, 09:20:32 PM »

Morello didn't nerf Jayce enough

Fiora has pretty much 0 range. And by the time she could gap close effectively I was already ahead.

Range almost always beats melee in a solo lane.

2631

Off Topic / Re: We are all gonna die

« on: November 09, 2012, 07:43:56 PM »

Tip: Visible light is a form of electromagnetic radiation. Some forms are not harmful at all.

2632

Games / Re: League of Legends - Megathread

« on: November 09, 2012, 06:39:05 PM »

I just had a fun game as Jayce top. Completely shut out Fiora. She had 0 kills and barely any minions, least gold on her team.

I farmed leaps and bounds above everyone else getting 1k more gold than the next closest person, which is a lot when I only had 7.5k because it was a short game.

I also died 0 times.

2633

Off Topic / Re: periods make a sentence more serious

« on: November 08, 2012, 09:16:39 AM »

Exclamation points would be more serious if the usage of them was not mocked on the internet!

2634

Games / Re: League of Legends - Megathread

« on: November 08, 2012, 09:14:25 AM »

I'm contemplating solo bot Heimerdinger.

That is one of the most OP strategies there is. I heard that Riot has actually killed people to keep it a secret. You might want to lock your doors.

2635

Off Topic / Re: 51 States

« on: November 07, 2012, 08:22:06 PM »

Well it was built on a sticky swamp that no one wanted to live. Anyway I would assume it would have to equalitity and that the capital belongs to everyone and not one state.

And if you want to have the federal government more powerful than the state government you wouldn't let a state control the laws in the federal district.

2636

Off Topic / Re: Are there any Google Doodles on your birthday?

« on: November 07, 2012, 08:20:56 PM »

May fourth.

There is one almost every year because it is children's day in japan. There are a few abstract ones though.

2637

Off Topic / Re: Obama - Admit's her husband is from Kenya

« on: November 05, 2012, 08:50:23 PM »

You'd have to be pretty dumb to vote for the Green party. They are a single-issue group, which means they are only united on one issue. Some of them don't even say what they believe on things other than the environment, and some conflict with each other on issues.

So not only would you be rolling the dice, but the party would probably be too busy arguing amongst themselves to do anything.

2638

Off Topic / Re: 2012 Election Megathread

« on: November 05, 2012, 08:44:44 PM »

Lowering taxes = More money for small business = Hiring more people and I believe Romney is in the right on the tax plan because he was in the private sector for most of his life and has grown businesses.

I would vote Vermin Supreme but he has 0 chance of winning so my vote would be wasted

I think Romney's tax plan is a little silly. If you want to balance the budget you need to either increase revenue or cut spending. He plans to increase spending and maybe, but probably not, increase revenue to compensate. So he will push us farther into a deficit, but the economy might be better.

2639

Off Topic / Re: 2012 Election Megathread

« on: November 05, 2012, 08:33:27 PM »

No, I understand, exactly as I described.  It's like saying, because aboloshing slavery is inherently liberal, ALL BLACKS ARE LIBERAL ARGGH.

Apparently saying that the majority of something is liberal because it exists due to liberalism is the same as saying that all of that something is liberal no exceptions.

And your slavery brown townogy is not good because:
 - The idea of government censorship is still existing. (See wikileaks)
 - The idea of slavery is long gone and a black person need not worry that a conservative president or congress will revert us back to slavery

Some examples of how the orientation of the supporting group usually is reflected by a benefiting group:
 - The Wall Street Journal is right-leaning. Why? Wall Street is right
 - A CEO is against taxes on big business. Why? A big business gives him money
 - The US supported the war in WWII but not late Vietnam. Why? In WWII we were attacked and therefore the country had to fight in order for our freedoms to be protected. At the end of Vietnam we were in there for what seemed to be no reason and America was not threatened by the result of that war.
 - So most newspapers are probably liberal because government interference is always a threat. It is in their best interest to be on the left.

2640

Off Topic / Re: 2012 Election Megathread

« on: November 05, 2012, 08:16:50 PM »

A law implicated by liberal ideals isn't implicit of its relatives being liberal.  It's a two way street, aswell -- it's a protected freedom.  It's a freedom (conservative) protected (liberal).  News stations are NOT inherently liberal and do NOT all support liberal ideals.  Using this sort of information to try and state that Fox may be credible is absolutely atrocious.  Again, see that nonbiased study showing how illiterate Fox News viewers are in comparison to others.

Protecting a freedom may be liberal, but to state that the people who promote these freedoms ARE liberal is hilarious.

You don't seem to understand. The press don't just promote these freedoms, they only exist because of these freedoms. Whether they are intentional or not about it, what they say is usually liberal leaning. The exception is when they are intentionally right (Fox News)

In order to get any split issue information evenly, you need to take from a variety sources. Which means that someone who looks at Fox News as well as other sources probably gets more information than you do.

As for your survey. It is essentially: "People who look at only conservative sources are more likely to believe stupid things conservatives say." I can guarantee you that people who look at only liberal sources are more likely to believe stupid things liberals say.