Messages

76

General Discussion / Re: what version was it when you started playing blockland?

« on: July 09, 2013, 01:02:30 PM »

very end of v8

77

Games / Re: Cube world (Too lazy to update so i put in links for forums)

« on: July 09, 2013, 01:01:23 PM »

Is there anyway to buy the game when the site is down?
It's been down consistently for 2 days and it's kind of annoying when I'd like to play it

78

Off Topic / Re: Birthday Kitton!

« on: July 09, 2013, 12:43:27 PM »

Today is my birthday! I turn 25 :3
The boyfriend and I are planning on Kayaking if it doesn't storm birthday love.
If it does relaxing day inside birthday love :D

fixed OP

anywho, happy birthday

79

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:44:33 PM »

I never said I didn't imply legalities, that's a completely different thing bud.
But it's not calling the authorities, which is what I'm defending here, you're on a different point.
That is the opposite of what Dream tried to say I was doing, so yeah again, invalid
Nah, go ahead and keep kissing ass though, I'm sure one day he'll give a forget :)

You're absolutely right. That's not the argument though.

If a person is known to spit water at people on the playground, does it not make sense to assume that if you see them walking inside with a teacher with their head down, that they got in trouble for doing it again?

I really can't think of a better way to put that without repeating myself.

That's my argument, and I've stood with that exact argument this entire time.  And no that doesn't make sense, unless the kid actually spits he has no reason to be punished.

That's like saying because I person speeds every other day a cop should stop him when he sees the persons car accelerating.

80

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:36:59 PM »

noedit; that picture isn't of my mother, that's actually her sister, good try though

81

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:36:23 PM »

I have updated the dossier.  This is a huge waste of time so please stop doing insane stuff.  

Wow, you proved that what I said was true, thanks.

But it does mean they are far, far more suspect if someone suspiciously dies the night after their release.

I understand that, but not that they will indefinitely do it.

I don't really understand what you're saying.

Are you saying the situation is different enough for people involved that have bad reputations to not be treated like they have them? I don't think that's what you're saying, because that doesn't make sense.

I'm saying reputation doesn't indefinitely make someone do something.

The first one isn't a thread
Second wasn't a threat to call authorities, a lawsuit is between two citizens bud, not police.
Third doesn't even have an innuendo of me calling authorities
Fourth isn't a threat, it's a promise

Then don't waste your time on a person doing insane stuff?

He has to make himself feel good, but he lost this one so it's okay

82

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:25:16 PM »

That's not how the world works.

If you have a strong reputation of being a pretty bad guy, people are going to assume in most situations that you're still a pretty bad guy.

Even if you're not trying to be.

Never said that's not how the world works, I'm saying they don't factually have the be the same way.

83

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:20:17 PM »

Actually you can. If somebody goes to jail for committing murder they can't get a job as a daycare worker.

That brown townogy doesn't apply.

Because someone goes to jail for murder doesn't mean the second they get out they're going to go kill someone.

84

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:09:51 PM »

And you only threatened to call the authorities, what? Three or four times?

That made no sense and no actually I haven't, but goooood try!

85

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:06:35 PM »

You obv missed the posts where Eepos and I talked about the attempted decompilation. and how Dotdot and Computermix worked together on that stuff.
Also Dotdot is, by definition, a terrorist, because he threatened badspot with releasing his name, home, and phone number.

I didn't miss anything.  Decompiling =/= malicious

And Badspot DID release my private information because he didn't get what he wanted, so he is now a terrorist?

86

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 07:04:30 PM »

Wasn't talking about dox'ing. I was talking about malicious codes.

The only thing I've seen dotdot actually do, and have proof of doing so, is dox'ing people.

87

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 06:58:41 PM »

Of course they have malicious intentions. That's all what they do.

You can't simply say that because someone has a bad reputation that they factually have to do something, that's not logical.

Actually yes you can, because in this case that terrorist terrorized people before. So it's safe to say that he's trying to terrorize people again when he breaks the law again.

The only thing I've seen dotdot actually do, and have proof of doing so, is dox'ing people.  Badspot dox'd me, so by your logic Badspot is also a terrorist?

88

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 06:53:57 PM »

Ok, but my point still stands.

I understand that but as does mine.

You don't call someone who parked illegally a terrorist.

89

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 06:50:43 PM »

By your logic I could always say what you said in my reply made no sense.
It made perfect sense towards what you said.  You seem to not be comprehending what 'Copyright Infringement' means. They modified the game which is against one of the exclusive rights.

Again since you still don't understand

I'm not saying what they're doing isn't bad, I'm saying they aren't doing it with malicious intentions.

90

Drama / Re: Computermix's new "script" (Blockland hack)

« on: July 08, 2013, 06:44:01 PM »

dude he can spend his mony on whatever he wants get off him.

That made no sense, try again please.  Sorry that you friends like to harass people because you have nothing better to do with your lives.

so he stalked your parents every time they bought groceries

Someone takes things a wee bit too literally, 'how you put', not 'how you harassed', meaning, he indirectly caused them to be harassed.
Try again

...how the forget do you know he replied to it...
...IF YOU DON'T USE THAT ACCOUNT?!?

The mother email was sent probably a week after I sent the email offering the information, if he can't reply within a week then sorry I didn't notice it.

That's almost like saying that a person can assault someone right in front of an officer and not get arrested meanwhile someone should get a ticket for being under the speed limit.
The law is the law, even if it's something so little.

That made no sense, if they aren't being malicious they aren't a high threat.  He makes them out to be malicious terrorists, trying to hijack accounts and hack his game.  They're loving around with a simple script.

Except you know, common sense.

Ah right, the well known band of timely hackers that takes over people's email accounts and writes insane stuff that fits right in with the victim's current drama but makes them look slightly foolish.  I heard that happens a lot. 

Wait was that before or after your email got hijacked and pretended to be you pretending to be your mom on an insane rant? 

If they have no negative intentions how is it common sense to call them malicious, do you call a priest malicious?  There's no logic behind what you just said

You know damn well I cannot prove that I didn't send that email, however, I can logically explain it.  If I sent that, why did I respond to your response with "ignore that last email", that would make no sense, is your common sense like broken or something?

That was before seeing as the last email I've ever sent you was "ignore that last email and disregard any further emails from this address as it has been compromised"
I mean sure, I'd love to rip you a new one under my mothers alias but that's a waste of my time.