Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
the COE has a tremendous power over marketing. What he does is going to have significantly more weight than some other random employee
Well, do you think socialism is a great idea either?depends on the topic
I thoguht we were talking about contraceptives here, not condoms.condom = birth control = contraception
In which case if you can't afford a damn condom for yourself then you have bigger issues than love.
the bad decision to not use protection...as if a couple is going to have love or not based off whether they have a condom
It should still be the company's choice to follow their "best interest" in this case, and not be forced by government regulation to do so.arent you the same guy from the police shooting thread? lol
did you have to not use protection? Are you going to make the company responsible for your bad decision?what bad decision? to have love? wtf
What else would I have meant.you're acting as if the ceo is paying out of pocket for this
Of course people should use protection."someone else"
Doesn't mean someone else should have to pay for it?
thats a funny way to state thingsi kinda worded that weird
don't all people want certain things passed because of their own beliefs about things?
The problem is that contraceptives aren't necessary for you to live. If you get sick or are injured or something then yes they should, and will pay for it but if you can't use a damn condom and decide to get pregnant anyways the company shouldn't be placed into responsibility.thats not the point
However contraception shouldn't be provided. That's just absurd. You don't need it. That's like saying plastic surgery should be provided by health insurance companies.i think its better to avoid a wrong turn then go down the wrong turn just to turn around later on (kinda stuffty brown townogy but w/e)
Also, shouldn't people be boycotting the use of Javascript since Eich was the direct creator of it? That would make more sense.that would be rather difficult to do
Same deal with Hobby Lobby. The owners of the Hobby Lobby company are Christian and don't support same love marriages and everyone is getting all pissy with them, but last time I checked we live in a free republic where people are allowed to practice their religious beliefs as long as it doesn't cause anyone else harm.except it kinda does?
I don't think Subpixel had any right to reveal Pacnet's personal information. All he did was a small troll action on a web site.GET THE loving INTERNET POLICE
Did Pacnet hack or DoS or do anything illegal? No. IP addresses and real names and locations should only be revealed on the forums, when the person has committed a crime.
