Hahaha, this is a pathetic argument from you rughugger.
Incomplete, not pathetic. I'm only ranging on the statement you presented. That's what debate is about. The more the banter goes on, will depend on what information I decide to bring into the light. It doesn't mean I am not doing research. You also forgot to account that at times tsunamis, specifically their destructive nature and aftermath have been considered floods in the past. Secondly, people who are in a flood wouldn't be concerned with gathering data on anything. Go ahead, ask any of the people who went through Katrina if they immediately went out to measure how much water flooded through their houses in gallons per second. Or at what force in pounds per square inch the chunks of buildings crushed their loved one's bodies in Haiti.
I agree, there is no amount of water on the Earth to cover it all, but a tsunami wave can create the illusion that there is and that can be a rather disturbing sight to see barreling down on you. Would you be standing on the beach with a tape measure trying to see how tall your imminent death was or would you be running for your life? There are a lot more things that are outside of the box that can account for other things and be interpreted the wrong way.