Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hey man (sorry if I just mis-gendered you), wherever you gotta move them goal posts to include permanently obliterating certain natural processes of the body and not your liberal-protected ones. The GMOs must've really done a number on y'all."Did you get your wisdom teeth removed? Why would you obstruct that totally natural process? It's absolutely barbaric!"
In what way are you disabled if you're an amputee? If you're wearing long pants and you didn't show anybody, no one would know - not only that but you can get a prosthetic leg so you can still walk.Well the obvious effect is that you'd be wheelchair-bound or forced to use a prosthetic leg. Prosthetic legs are not 1:1 perfect solutions for having a missing limb. They offer limited mobility and they don't have nerve endings.
Is this what the conditioning seriously gets people to say? forget me. We're really not far off from normalizing BIID aren't we
< muh cosmetic surgeryIn what way are you disabled if you're trans? If you're infertile and you told no one, no one would know - not only that but you can have your sperm or eggs stored so that you can still have biological kids later.
Yeah if only you could actually compare completely destroying natural processes of the body to straightening a nose by a couple degrees, your argument would be so easy to make. Cool 6 gorrilion years of Certified Liberal research bro
Gender dysphoria is indeed a mental illness, and it is indeed a prerequisite for being trans. I really don't get why people feel the need to go the extra mile and try to say otherwise. Either you have a legitimate mental illness that can be cured through love change therapy/surgery, or you're just loving around and think being a tomboy means you're nonbinary or some other bullstuff.I do disagree that you need dysphoria to be trans, but even if that were true, many legitimately trans people transition in different ways - some go all the way and do HRT and love change surgery, some just do hormones or only some surgery, and some simply use clothes/makeup. Obviously not all of these cost as much as cosmetic surgery and hormone therapy, but even the most expensive option isn't prohibitively expensive.
In adolescents and adults gender dysphoria diagnosis involves a difference between one’s experienced/expressed gender and assigned gender, and significant distress or problems functioning. It lasts at least six months and is shown by at least two of the following:
A marked incongruence between one’s experienced/expressed gender and primary and/or secondary love characteristics
A strong desire to be rid of one’s primary and/or secondary love characteristics
A strong desire for the primary and/or secondary love characteristics of the other gender
A strong desire to be of the other gender
A strong desire to be treated as the other gender
A strong conviction that one has the typical feelings and reactions of the other gender
A psychological state is considered a mental disorder only if it causes significant distress or disability. Many transgender people do not experience their gender as distressing or disabling, which implies that identifying as transgender does not constitute a mental disorder.
If you look at the chart, you will see that psychologists are basically glorified high-school dropouts; they are right next to elementary education majors. I'm glad they left the REAL science for the smarter ones.If you knew anything about psychology you'd understand that IQ is not a reliable indicator of intelligence. Regardless of how well psychology majors can do abstract logic problems or whatever, psychology is a science, performed with adherence to the scientific method.
< Blinding yourself with drain cleaner because you identify as a blind person is a clear indication of mental illnessIf you don't see the difference between heedlessly mutilating yourself and undergoing a cosmetic surgery which has been regarded as one of the best means of treatment after 50 years of research, I don't think there's a point in arguing
< Amputating yourself by injecting turds into your knees because you identify as an amputee is a clear indication of mental illness
< Cutting your richard and balls off because you identity as a(n) ??????? is totally fine and completely normal
Why is it that the only thing all these LGBTQ folk have in common is that none of them can breed? (spoiler: eugenics)
get out of here with your reason and logicThanks, that means a lot. Being an SJW feminational socialist libtard on this forum can feel pretty isolating.
I love you for these posts
TRUE dont-ask-dont-tell would be true equality.AFAIK under DADT you would be discharged if the fact that you were gay even slipped out. I hope you mean "true DADT" as in "literally no one cares whether you're gay, not even the system". Unless you buy into that bullstuff that being gay breaks group cohesion or something like that.
its when we feel the need to label and assign different rules to different people that it doesn't work in the military.
the moment you mention your feelings or personality preferences, you are a burden and useless.
talk about your girl/boyfriend and your genitals in your own loving time.
Ultima are you seriously defending this dude? He's been drama'd multiple times in the past few months. Open your eyes.i try to stay away from political threads nowadays so maybe im just not seeing any of his posts
why can't we dislike him for political reasonsI mean you can, but again, if its just for political reasons you probably shouldn't drama them for it.
he's an insulting ass that argues forever with people he doesnt agree with and has a long furtive sense of humor since he refuses to detect jokes he disagrees with>insulting
I didn't realize not supporting murder and terrorism was a politically charged viewpoint, but shame on me for overestimating the moral integrity of a liberalI'm glad to accept that the reason you don't like him is his support of the IRA. I'd have to read up on the Troubles for that to convince me of anything though, which is why I'm asking for a nonpolitical reason.
hes pretty annoying with his viewsI feel like I feel politically antagonized all the time here though, and only now that someone is doing it in the other direction is it something worth discussing?
its like badpost's (or nal)? posts in INH's brick pack thread, they're pretty insensitive, short sighted, and one sided posts that any reasonable person would realize would trigger someone to be annoyed
the fact its political makes it more annoying, but its not cause of that this drama was made. im sure seventhsandwich has peeved people here before over politics but he never pushed it like leisuresuit did
Yeah the point is that you're unironically shilling for some obnoxious friend that supports murdering children with carbombs because he's on your side of political spectrum *sips tea*im legitimately trying to understand where people in this thread are coming from - show me a reason you dont like him besides his political views. i dont know him at all and i have no investment in people respecting him.
That belief is exactly what does them in. If they stand for the underdog, then they have to repeatedly figure out who the underdog is in every scenario. Sure, poor people are in a low spot, but black people are marginalized systematically!!11!111! so they're the underdog and not the white poor people, they have inherent privilege and are tribal by default!!!1!1!!11!
i think the problem is more to do with how centrist democrats are compared to the past/the center-left in other countries. there is currently not much focus on economic leftism in the democratic party (although bernie pushed them left somewhat)
it feels to me like the right was effective in convincing the white working class that their problems and problems worth discussing are being caused by immigrants / people of color / feminists / etc
furthermore the democratic party has really hesitated to actually have stances on stuff because they don't want to alienate potential voters that are formerly republican or otherwise confused about social issues, and so they come off as very bland, unprincipled, and wishy-washy
Want a better example? Leftists support gays, lesbians, transgenderqueernormativenonc onformativemcgoos. A terrorist attack happens. Immediately rush to support Muslims, whose religion is markedly homophobic, even by standards set by Christianity. In Islamic countries, they will throw you off the roof of a skyscraper for being gay. Whether they like to admit it or not, it throws gays under the bus, which is why you have all the Milo Yiannopoulos's.
ill just say its because as a leftist islamophobia seems just like a veil for racism. you can still be critical of islam while not supporting the actions of muslim theocracies. also the terrifying scourge of muslim immigrants / refugees is largely overblown and not an actual issue, its just xenophobia rearing its ugly old head for the 300th time in history.
It's a belief system that basically sets groups up to be dumped later on. It's why they keep losing, and it's why people are better off just getting a system of values that stands for everyone rather than just a few people.
i dont really buy the idea that democrats are having trouble picking "one underdog" - the narrative among the left is that there are multiple axises on which you can be underprivileged (economic status, race, gender, loveuality, etc) and theres not really a way to compare "oppression"
between them (as in theres no telling whether being gay is worse than being black, and its a pointless question anyway)
i think you may be confusing liberals' neglect of considering economic status as an actual way to be oppressed as them being unable to focus on more than one issue at once
are you ignoring his stuffty posts because he's one of the two other hard leftists on this forumare you talking about his like low effort insults/jokes? does that warrant being mad at him? im actually trying to figure out what youre talking about
Replace it with whatever the applicable snowflake identity terminology this week isso im just a blatant pragmatist socialist? thats not that harsh
better dead than red
fuggbrowsing through his recent posts is a good starti read through the last 5 pages. you're going to have to be more specific about how he's being "autistic"
