3811
Games / Re: Haven & Hearth 2: World 9 | A Blockland Tradition
« on: June 12, 2016, 02:16:13 PM »What did i miss when i went to bed. Ill be online in like 5 hoursClaim's up.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
What did i miss when i went to bed. Ill be online in like 5 hoursClaim's up.
http://ringofbrodgar.com/wiki/Haven_and_Hearth_WikiIt's actually pretty stuff. It's a hodge-podge mix of new and legacy info. Although I'm gonna work on cleaning it up (and all of you should too).

Ive heard this game sucks now. Doesnt it cost money as well?Nah it's great dude. Old isometric art style is dead, but it plays just like the original. The combat system is objectively a billion times better too.
world 4 we were gods and controlled a 6th of the map.Is true. Good times were had in Tarn of Hotdog.
Age:
Timezone:
How much time you can spend on the game(not requiring lots):
Experience in H&H(not required):
Skype/Steam Username:
What you would want to do in the game:




He's up against some of the worst establishment skills in the country who just happen to have a lead because they're feeding off the energy of the Obama presidency. But you know what? They still loving suck. Annoying Orange is one of the single greatest individuals in the world, he turned a small loan of a million dollars into billions and would have made more if not for constantly thinking about running for president. Maybe you should shut the forget up before you make handicapped posts like this. You know why? Because you're going to be embarrassed when Annoying Orange wins and somebody shows you a screencap of this. Oh look at that, a poll was released showing Annoying Orange ahead of Sanders. Are you a loving drunk? Are you handicapped? Are you autistic? You are a loving idiot and you should never make a post on this board again and I'm loving serious.This could be a great copypasta some day.
where do you find thisHover over the thread title on your message. Alternatively, quote someone elses message, and it's in the tags.
but since there are no post counters on blf u have to use the timestampYes there are. This is thread #298244 and your message is #9093946
And the emails aren't the only thing she's done, despite that being a big part of it, including it being confirmed that her classified emails used for loving drone strikes,That seems like a misleading summary of the article.
The 2011 and 2012 emails were sent via the "low side" -government slang for a computer system for unclassified matters
The emails, which did not mention the "CIA," "drones" or details about the militant targets, were written within the often-narrow time frame in which State Department officials had to decide whether or not to object to drone strikes before the CIA pulled the trigger, the officials said, according to the Journal.
which she used through an unsecure phone despite being ordered to use a secure phone to prevent hacking, (Yes, she even dealt with the drones strikes over her insecure phone. The incompetence is real.) which then was promptly hacked and read by at least one person (who now has made a plea deal and has immunity), probably a lot more,
had her emails run through a third party company without security clearance completely viewable by ordinary citizens or other hackers, (URL at https://www.yahoo.com/news/expert-clinton-emails-could-compromised-third-party-spam-024604076.html ) are confirmed to have put classified US operations in danger.
but i doubt he's going to go out of his way to find several when he could just link one and people could make inferences from thatAnd in turn, I can point out why that's completely ridiculous reasoning. Guess we've gone full circle here.
Some? She's an outright criminal.I mean, people say this, but the State Department has all of her emails, including those that were previously 'deleted'. If she did destroy confidential government information, why haven't they indicted her? You either have to rely on increasingly tenuous conspiracy theories, or accept the fact that it was a political gaffe - not a crime.