4681
Off Topic / Re: I'm in big trouble by the HOA
« on: November 10, 2013, 02:38:03 AM »you've misunderstood that experiment if you take it as being applicable to all situations. there are far more factors at play in this scenario.
if someone is past the threshold of caring what uniform you're in (as a result of alcohol, drugs, general aggression, etc (factors not in the study btw)), what good is your experiment then? are you going to quote the study to them while they've got you pinned down? lol
The essence of the experiment (whether or not an being an authority figure actually makes a difference on judgement of others) is applicable to all situations. I'm not saying there aren't more factors at play, but on a psychological level everyone (including people who may break into gated complexes) is predisposed to obeying implied and expressed commands from authority. Drugs may deteriorate their ability to make intelligent decisions, but that's besides the point. What I was saying is that authority is derived from the uniform, not your muscular build. If someone's going to attack a security guard, it's not their muscular build they consider before doing so.
Regardless to that, and onto the original point: it isn't a security guard's job to use force to prevent unauthorized entry nor crime from occurring on premises. If someone fails to be reasoned with upon being confronted (this includes attacking you), it isn't your job to stop them. It's your job to call the police. Being attacked by potential criminals is an occupational hazard of the job regardless of the employee's muscular build and while you're correct in that being stronger will make it easier to protect yourself it's sort of irrelevant to your ability to actually perform the job you're hired to do. A gate guard is not a body guard.