Poll

What's your stance on testing animals for scientific reasons?

I strongly agree.
4 (25%)
I agree.
2 (12.5%)
I somewhat agree.
2 (12.5%)
I can't decide.
0 (0%)
Neutral.
3 (18.8%)
I somewhat disagree.
3 (18.8%)
I disagree.
0 (0%)
I strongly disagree.
2 (12.5%)

Total Members Voted: 16

Author Topic: Your stance on Animal Testing.  (Read 616 times)

Animal testing, or scientific studies preforming tests on lower lifeforms. Many people debate over this issue. Some say it's animal cruelty, while others say it's safer than human guinea pigs. Usually it's testing medicine for future use and side-effects.

Why so many people disagree is they believe that it's torturing the animal. And usually, it seems a lot like torture. Others say it's for scientific breakthroughs and it's for the good of mankind.

So what's your stance on it?

Depends what the testing is for. If its for seeing if fire burns than yes, its a bad thing. But if its for something like testing a vaccine for cancer then that's all good.

« Last Edit: September 19, 2011, 11:27:23 AM by Tom Gunn »

I say we should use the people who think it is cruel as test subjects  :cookieMonster:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2BxGOdYm8U&feature=related

Is this cool or what?

That is cool. It was a first step in making artificial organs and aided greatly for people in serious accidents that needed life support.

Good find. I just wonder how they got that dog head.

I'll ask all the people who oppose of it to be injected with cancer and be researched.

At least the animals are fine

Are there any better alternatives?

Are there any better alternatives?
LIVE HUMAN BEINGS WOULD WORK GREAT.

Let's test our stuff on the people who disagree with it.

Also, the poll is too much, at least halve the options.

PETA
People Eating Tasty Animals

anyways
not all for it, but not totally against it either
we could use a few less rats in this world.

i disagree with it unless it's something that isn't horribly handicapped like injecting it with poison to watch what happens