Author Topic: Unethical Experiments and The Population  (Read 3596 times)


jail =/= prison
people sure like to change around what other people say. people in death row or life imprisonment. let me get the bottom of this and note, i'm not trying to change your view point on this situation, if you stand so firm on how this work, good for you, there's a reason this is my opinion, not yours, so shut up pls.
Yeah yeah yeah, details details. I knew what you meant, didn't feel like typing prison rather than jail

doing cruel experiments make 'us' as bad as them? how so? this doesn't make sense since we're not only ridding the world of this disturbance but also extending out knowledge of medical treatments.
people in prison in death row, they're going to die, one way or another, that means they're going to die horribly, someone in life imprisonment is going to die to confinement by themselves or with someone else who may get out earlier than them, which just adds depression unless they're completely whacko in which case they won't even what's happening when they're being experimented upon. it wouldn't be torture because torture is the deliberate attempt of causing pain. for all we know one prisoner may just die from cardiac arrest, no pain, just asleep, one may die with excruciating pain. either way, it's done for the good of humanity.
We wouldn't rid the world of murders. We would rid the world of prisoners, that wouldn't stop crime by any means. And I would much rather be treated with medical knowledge gained by the usual studies rather than cruel experiments on prisoners any day. If you're on death row, you are executed quickly and somewhat humanely. Experimenting on people is like an advanced death row sentence, first torture the prisoner, then watch him slowly die. That is not humane or ethical. And besides, the dead should be respected, even if they were evil-doers in life. And taking information from ones torture is not respectful in the slightest.
     And is it not torture? You are deliberately experimenting on people unsure of the outcome, they could have extreme slow pain, or they could survive. And if they survive then they'll probably be experimented on a second time until they do die. You would be deliberately doing this without caring how much potential pain the subject goes through, it's just cruel. I could never call medical advancement found in this way the "good of humanity."

the fact that you guys argue against this while you don't even bother if someone across the world is being brutally stabbed and raped.
Who ever said that? Just because we argue against this doesn't mean we think that's ok. Besides, we aren't talking about that

i'm locking this topic, you can't even share an opinion on the internet.