Author Topic: Check out my new freakin' big monitor... (Read 1314 times)

Night Fox · April 05, 2013, 10:10:31 PM

Quote from: Cakey on April 05, 2013, 10:04:14 PM

and I thought 1920x1080 was big :i

1920x1200 is cooler

Ad Bot · Advertisement

Cakey · April 06, 2013, 05:45:42 PM

Quote from: Night Fox on April 05, 2013, 10:10:31 PM

1920x1200 is cooler

probably is

Zeblote · April 06, 2013, 06:15:58 PM

Quote from: Night Fox on April 05, 2013, 10:10:31 PM

1920x1200 is cooler

Wtf?
Why not 4096x2160?

Bahamut · April 06, 2013, 06:39:49 PM

Quote from: Night Fox on April 05, 2013, 10:10:31 PM

1920x1200 is cooler

nah 1920x1080 ftw
perfect sized monitor

Operator¹ · April 06, 2013, 06:40:02 PM

Quote from: Zeblote on April 06, 2013, 06:15:58 PM

Wtf?
Why not 4096x2160?

because not everyone uses a monitor of that resolution

RagnaTheBroedge · April 06, 2013, 08:09:29 PM

1024x768 master race

Night Fox · April 06, 2013, 08:11:48 PM

Quote from: Bahamut on April 06, 2013, 06:39:49 PM

nah 1920x1080 ftw
perfect sized monitor

exact monitor size (in this case) doesn't really matter, because you can always choose to display things in 1920x1080 anyway
so 1920x1200 has no disadvantages

breadboy · April 06, 2013, 08:12:28 PM

Jesus Christ, the width of the monitor is the length of my laptop's screen.

Night Fox · April 06, 2013, 08:13:52 PM

Quote from: breadboy on April 06, 2013, 08:12:28 PM

Jesus Christ, the width of the monitor is the length of my laptop's screen.

since we're talking about monitors, length = width
do you mean the height of his monitor?

Cool Boi · April 06, 2013, 08:14:06 PM

Quote from: padmedog on April 05, 2013, 08:54:48 PM

Cakey · April 06, 2013, 08:21:14 PM

Quote from: Zeblote on April 06, 2013, 06:15:58 PM

Wtf?
Why not 4096x2160?

jesus christ why would you ever need a monitor that big

RagnaTheBroedge · April 06, 2013, 08:21:51 PM

"HOW ELSE WILL I BE SLIGHTLY MORE JUSTIFIABLE IN CALLING MODERN GAME TEXTURES LOW-RES"